The version of A-5 tested today is probably what @hellbent found some photos of a couple of years back:
I came here to make "is it round or pointy?" jokes. I guess that answers the question.
This version of the A-5 is so different from its initial form that it might as well be a new missile.
Good they have officially tested this. For a long time we had the tech for an ASAT & a MIRVed ICBM but the political leadership hesitated from demonstrating it publicly. There are internal programs for FOBS & hypersonic glide vehicles in the works. Wonder if those will be publicly demonstrated too.
Let me know when it's actually deployed.
Pallav Bagela here said he saw mirv way back in 2012 itself , few more things were also made clear by Dr Saraswat sir.For the Nth time, India has already deployed MIRV capable missiles from last more than ten years. Even Agni 3 was MIRV capable carrying 3 RVs....
What we have tested now is much more advanced version of MIRV with decoys, maneuverable RVs to beat ABMs, newer capabilities eg trajectory control, penetration aids, decoys in a SoS configuration & also advance miniature nuclear weapons RVs...
What is important to note is the timing of the test. This test was carried out in tandem with more than 10000 troops being shifted from Pakistan border and deployed on the Chinese front apart from the the huge deployment already available to send the message don't mess with India during elections which Chinese are contemplating.
Next test will be ASAT in a week or 2. Save this post, we will discuss next week about ASAT test...
By the way when will UK test it's Trident missile again. Last time it was tested it felled just a few metres from the submarine it was launched and was dangerously close to destroy the multi billion dollar submarine...
Trident missile test fails for second time in a row
The UK's nuclear deterrent failed to fire a test missile reportedly landing close to the launch site.www.bbc.com
Was I disputing that?For the Nth time, India has already deployed MIRV capable missiles from last more than ten years. Even Agni 3 was MIRV capable carrying 3 RVs....
It confirms what I said...Pallav Bagela here said he saw mirv way back in 2012 itself , few more things were also made clear by Dr Saraswat sir.
Let us know when you finally test american Trident missile, successfully.
Successful Royal Navy test firings had occurred in 2000, 2005, 2009 and 2012. They are infrequent due to the missile's £17 million cost.[134] By August 2016 there had been 161 successful test firings of the Trident II D-5 missile since 1989, the most recent being from USS Maryland in August 2016.[135] Fewer than 10 test flights have been failures
"Matthew Savill, director of military sciences at the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi), said that overall Trident had a “good record”. The US, which has the same system, announced there had been 191 successful test firings since 1989 and “single figure” number of failures. He said this compared with a reported 50 per cent failure rate for the Russian Bulava missile recently accepted into service. A US submarine successfully fired a Trident missile as recently as October. ...Savill said that nuclear powers monitored each others’ tests closely, and the “demonstration of a credible, ie functioning, capability is an important part of deterrence”.
Last time you claimed that South Korea was ahead of India in terms of ICBM tech. Now eat your words backWas I disputing that?
Thats MARV, multiple arrayvre entry vehicle. Yesterday's one is MIRV. When DRDO & PM himself stating that its the first MIRV, why you guys are saying otherwise?For the Nth time, India has already deployed MIRV capable missiles from last more than ten years. Even Agni 3 was MIRV capable carrying 3 RVs....
What we have tested now is much more advanced version of MIRV with decoys, maneuverable RVs to beat ABMs, newer capabilities eg trajectory control, penetration aids, decoys in a SoS configuration & also advance miniature nuclear weapons RVs...
What is important to note is the timing of the test. This test was carried out in tandem with more than 10000 troops being shifted from Pakistan border and deployed on the Chinese front apart from the the huge deployment already available to send the message don't mess with India during elections which Chinese are contemplating.
Next test will be ASAT in a week or 2. Save this post, we will discuss next week about ASAT test...
By the way when will UK test it's Trident missile again. Last time it was tested it felled just a few metres from the submarine it was launched and was dangerously close to destroy the multi billion dollar submarine...
Trident missile test fails for second time in a row
The UK's nuclear deterrent failed to fire a test missile reportedly landing close to the launch site.www.bbc.com
Thats MARV, multiple arrayvre entry vehicle. Yesterday's one is MIRV. When DRDO & PM himself stating that its the first MIRV, why you guys are saying otherwise?
Probably is. Mainly because they've had help from outside though.Last time you claimed that South Korea was ahead of India in terms of ICBM tech. Now eat your words back
What is the need for comparing with SK. Let him do it.Last time you claimed that South Korea was ahead of India in terms of ICBM tech. Now eat your words back
Agni-5 MK2 with 3 MIRV bus(and decoys) all capable of MaRV is going to be literally impossible for Chinese BMD to intercept. So, it's a great capability addition for usWhat is the need for comparing with SK. Let him do it.
Look at what this proves
a. Miniaturization of navigation systems on individual warhead modules
b. Capability of targeting without need for external navigation systems
c. Miniaturization of nuclear warheads. This also proves Pokhran miniaturization was on track all this while.
d. Canisterisation. This, I think is the most critical part which we are not talking about. Mated warheads. If there are 10 Agni-Vs deployed, then you are looking at at least 30 warheads deployed. Add to this the next stage, which will be SLBM. We are talking about at the least 50 deployed warheads.
e. Miniaturisation can lead to one more cog in the triad. Namely, Air Launched Nuclear Hypersonic Cruise Missile.
The last one is what I expect us to do over the next few years. It will mean a dramatic change in our nuclear policy, where we will speak like the French. Employment of tactical nukes before going strategic. This also is useful in the 2 front scenario. Enabling us to move the capability across both fronts, comparatively quickly.
In the Nitin Gokhale program Dr Avinash Chander said they started work on mirv related papers from 1999. That is true, science behind it was long researched on & perfected. Deploying it in a system was matter of weaponisation & also needed right boundary conditions derived from nuke miniaturisation work for obvious reasons. You need a broad idea about what your payload systems are gonna be otherwise you won't be able to design a realistic frozen config in our case. These are not old dumb warheads that are released at specific points in the trajectory. Each of these mirv can do own maneuvering to counter any ABM threat.It confirms what I said...
Had same problem with safriz who mocked me whenever I told that we have MIRV capable missiles deployed even though I had posted images of satellite bus to launch multiple satellites which is almost the same technology used for MIRV capable missiles..