Best analysis sir...Can it be a revenge of ss1 documentary what they have done now(celebration)...The entire problem, especially among the foreign media, wrt the Indian claim regarding the F16 shoot down came about as a result of severe arrogance within IAF HQ.
The IAF perhaps believed that they had a divine right to have their words taken at face value across the world. They simply brushed over the fact that there was a lack of corroborating evidence and as such their claims could and would definitely be challenged. They just made a single statement without any proof, and thus left the battle for public perception uncontested.
After that decision, they were genuinely surprised that Pakistan filled up that void through a massive campaign of misinformation and careful manipulation of foreign press to produce reports favourable to them. In the absence of an Indian narrative, the entire attention of the world shifted to the Pakistani narrative, and IAF's claim was made to look like a donkey high on grass.
Pakistanis were able to seize the initiative due to this initial screw up. Then to their horror, IAF realized that nobody outside was buying their one line word of God. They panicked and put on that press conference with the radar imagery. But by then the narrative was firmly with Pakistan, and media behind them, given that IAF had refused for weeks to present any evidence.
It would be months before the truth would come out. But by then the public attention had already moved on. And nobody bothered to Know the reality. As such for a large number of people globally, the PAF kicked the face in of the IAF. And perception matters in this world.
American predators roamed freely over Pakistan airspace and bombed the shit out for years.
Indians and their fantasies ...
So.... Indian UAV are freely roaming in our Azad Kashmir ?![]()
The entire problem, especially among the foreign media, wrt the Indian claim regarding the F16 shoot down came about as a result of severe arrogance within IAF HQ.
The IAF perhaps believed that they had a divine right to have their words taken at face value across the world. They simply brushed over the fact that there was a lack of corroborating evidence and as such their claims could and would definitely be challenged. They just made a single statement without any proof, and thus left the battle for public perception uncontested.
After that decision, they were genuinely surprised that Pakistan filled up that void through a massive campaign of misinformation and careful manipulation of foreign press to produce reports favourable to them. In the absence of an Indian narrative, the entire attention of the world shifted to the Pakistani narrative, and IAF's claim was made to look like a donkey high on grass.
Pakistanis were able to seize the initiative due to this initial screw up. Then to their horror, IAF realized that nobody outside was buying their one line word of God. They panicked and put on that press conference with the radar imagery. But by then the narrative was firmly with Pakistan, and media behind them, given that IAF had refused for weeks to present any evidence.
It would be months before the truth would come out. But by then the public attention had already moved on. And nobody bothered to Know the reality. As such for a large number of people globally, the PAF kicked the face in of the IAF. And perception matters in this world.
I don't think it's as serious as you make it out to be. Even if perception among the masses outside Indo-Pak is that PAF beat the IAF, the perception among the civilian and military leaders around the world who know the true story is what matters. I'm sure the P5 know the whole story, and I'm sure Imran Khan is not going to lie to leaders around the world about the actual fate of the F-16. So the only downside is some loss of face during tea room gossip.
Also the IAF did not bow down to pressure from a perception battle to release proof, but it was actually pressure from our own Opposition that led to releasing of the radar images, which I believe shouldn't have been done in the first place. The IAF's current disposition has long term advantages. By not talking too much, that one line will eventually be remembered when the truth gets out. In future instances, who's gonna believe the Pakistanis, this is the world of the Internet after all and stuff you say is gonna float around for years if not decades. That one line is worth its weight in gold. The nation's motto is "Truth alone triumphs". We merely have to live up to our own motto, which the forces at least haven't yet failed at doing.
The scale of retaliation by IAF in Balakot, in my opinion, was minuscule. If you want to deliver a message, India's operations scale should have been much higher.
Next; IAF needs to bring back Mig21Bisons from the Forward bases and deploy Mig29UPGs/MKI/M2K's out there. Knowingly fielding an aircraft that you know will be outgunned and relying just on superior training is not a strategy for success.
Finally, you have verbal diarrhea of politicians in this dispensation, a distinguishing feature of the Modi government who have to butt head in every effin topic which they have no clue of commenting on damage assessment.
When you have your own resources working against your narrative, there is very little that ISPR needs to do.
I don't think there is anything more important in evaluating air combat than validating claims of each side, despite what your opinion might be.
As far as objectives, IAF doesn't have BDA like say USAF does, and given I am not fighting an election in India, I have no qualms enquiring the actual damage and casualty of the IAF raid. And before people jump on brief to the IAF, it is absolutely imperative for the IAF to actually provide the estimated human casualties, which is standard for USAF or any NATO contingent upon undertaking any air raids. There is no reason for IAF not be held to the same standard.
The "other point" you raise for India's perspective is just shameful, nothing to be proud of using old platform and old ordnance; by doing so we are pitting superior training against technology which after a threshold becomes pointless. And India: supposedly a state that is bigger, richer and has a higher defense budget than Pakistan, employing older platform and ordnance is just pathetic. Air combat is the last place where you need to boast of austerity.
If we think carefully , this concept of
Limited Area -- Limited Period War is
Never going to be satisfying
Next time we will have to go in for
One Day Maximum strikes
If they can carry out 5000 sorties in 3 days in Gaganshakti , why not carry out at least 1800 sorties in a 24 hour period
24 hours is -- The limit after which their 3 Daddies start crying-- US , China , Saudi.
Lucky for Pakistan, Balakot happened before the modernisation had begun.
After all the Circus and Bombastic talk that PAF hierarchy does , they must be
Banging Tables and their Heads inside
Closed doorswhile taking stock of their operational Readiness
It is not easy to live with such brazen lies
No , Lucky for INDIA that Balakot happened
Feb 26 and 27 has only helped IAF in Further Improvement of everything and speeded up the capability enhancement
Even the Shooting down of MI 17 has now led to the Creation of Air Defence Command
India aint America...American predators roamed freely over Pakistan airspace and bombed the shit out for years.
Maybe Chinese air defence got confused ?![]()
They have a statue of Abhinandan somewhere in a museum now. I wonder if the PAF officers are gonna salute every time they walk past it. Talk about morale in front of that statue.
Question remains that with what Abhinandan shot the Pakistani F-16?
All 4 missiles his jet carried, crashed with his jet and in Pakistan's custody and on display.
Every time A PAF pilot takes off he will wonder about the fact that If he dies , he will never get any recognition
Question remains that with what Abhinandan shot the Pakistani F-16?
All 4 missiles his jet carried, crashed with his jet and in Pakistan's custody and on display.
That's a very difficult issue for any soldier to deal with. The only real reward for a soldier is being recognised for the work they do, and even that is happily denied if you are flying for the PAF or fighting for Pakistan in general.
No they are not.Question remains that with what Abhinandan shot the Pakistani F-16?
All 4 missiles his jet carried, crashed with his jet and in Pakistan's custody and on display.
Pakistan has lost 2 Brigadiers on LOC
But conveniently hidden them
Talking of Feb 27 , it was Around Evening
Last year
At this time that We got Confirmation about Wing Commander Abhinandan Captured and saw pictures of His Face bloodied
He is such a Brave Guy , those 2 days were
Nerve wracking for so many of us
WHAT ABHINANDAN MIGHT BE THINKING TODAY
None of these are actually important.
The question is whether objectives were achieved. Both forces were on hair-trigger alert. IAF successfully bombed Balakot and two other locations, while PAF failed to even attack their primary objectives, while failing to hit the secondary objectives that they did eventually attack.
Another point to consider is the IAF used rather outdated air to air missiles like the RVV-AE (30 years) and R-73E (40 years), while the PAF used slightly more modern AAMs like the C5s (20 years), but the IAF fired only 1 40-year old missile and claimed a kill, while the PAF fired as many as 7 AMRAAMs that we know of and managed to get only 1 kill, against an aircraft that was defenceless to AMRAAMs in the first place.
The entire problem, especially among the foreign media, wrt the Indian claim regarding the F16 shoot down came about as a result of severe arrogance within IAF HQ.
The IAF perhaps believed that they had a divine right to have their words taken at face value across the world. They simply brushed over the fact that there was a lack of corroborating evidence and as such their claims could and would definitely be challenged. They just made a single statement without any proof, and thus left the battle for public perception uncontested.
After that decision, they were genuinely surprised that Pakistan filled up that void through a massive campaign of misinformation and careful manipulation of foreign press to produce reports favourable to them. In the absence of an Indian narrative, the entire attention of the world shifted to the Pakistani narrative, and IAF's claim was made to look like a donkey high on grass.
Pakistanis were able to seize the initiative due to this initial screw up. Then to their horror, IAF realized that nobody outside was buying their one line word of God. They panicked and put on that press conference with the radar imagery. But by then the narrative was firmly with Pakistan, and media behind them, given that IAF had refused for weeks to present any evidence.
It would be months before the truth would come out. But by then the public attention had already moved on. And nobody bothered to Know the reality. As such for a large number of people globally, the PAF kicked the face in of the IAF. And perception matters in this world.