Opinion Battle of Saragarhi : When 21 Sikhs Faced Over 10,000 Pashtuns at Saragarhi And Won

Arpit said:
Bro, are you trying to look stupid or you are?

Cholas are of 10th century, Ashoka was in BC.
Click to expand...
All the more time for the money to be invested and grow into ill-gotten gains. This is the same theory Indians use about British looting is it not?
 
Ashwin said:
Yes, I made assertion because you answered so to my question about English history with Rome.

Wait, is that because there is history before 43 AD?
Click to expand...
Dude you implied that the Romans invaded the British Isles in the 3rd century BC, which is incorrect, deal with it. And banging on a stone is an extremely minimalist attempt to record history. Stonehenge was constructed as early as 3000BC. It's now 2018AD and you haven't even managed to construct a toilet in some places.
 
Last edited:
BMD said:
All the more time for the money to be invested and grow into ill-gotten gains. This is the same theory Indians use about British looting is it not?
Click to expand...


So Cholas looted Malaysia and Indonesia in 10th century, while Ashoka enriched with it in 300 BC?

Great timeline you got there. Must be Brirish version of timeline.
 
Arpit said:
So why not Anglo Saxons/Irish use Kaiser/Ceaser as they are Romans?

I think, you think only Kaiser was Wilhelm, improve your European history.
Click to expand...
'King' comes from the Anglo-Saxon term 'cyning.' 'Queen' comes from 'cwen.'
 
Arpit said:
So Cholas looted Malaysia and Indonesia in 10th century, while Ashoka enriched with it in 300 BC?

Great timeline you got there. Must be Brirish version of timeline.
Click to expand...
They both looted from their invaded territories. You owe these countries compensation.
 
Arpit said:
So, Anglo-Saxons are not Romans?

Then why stating they were Romans?
What are they? Germans? Definetely Germens. ;)
Click to expand...
So, the British Isles has been invaded several times, we just don't complain about it and say that people owe compensation like complete dumbasses would. In the end we just defeated all our invaders in war later on. Trafalgar, Waterloo, WWI, WWII.
 
BMD said:
They both looted from their invaded territories. You owe these countries compensation.
Click to expand...
When Ashoka invaded Malaysia or Indonesia? Or you creating your own history?

As for Chola, please provide evidence that they looted Malaysia. Or they are the one of the first one who established huge human population there?
 
BMD said:
So, the British Isles has been invaded several times, we just don't complain about it and say that people owe compensation like complete dumbasses would.
Click to expand...
Where I am saying that.

All the things you saying, you saying you are Roman.
 
Arpit said:
When Ashoka invaded Malaysia or Indonesia? Or you creating your own history?

As for Chola, please provide evidence that they looted Malaysia. Or they are the one of the first one who established huge human population there?
Click to expand...
I re-direct you to an earlier quote by one of your colleagues.

Opinion - Battle of Saragarhi : When 21 Sikhs Faced Over 10,000 Pashtuns at Saragarhi And Won

There is no story from the other side because they were incapable of recording history.
Click to expand...

Aside from that, empires always looted you dummy. Do you seriously expect the world to believe that Indian medieval empires just happened to be an exception to the rule.

The titles used by the Cholas; An Examination (Part-I)

After defeating an alliance of the Pandya & Ceylon kings, and after further conducting raid on Lanka, he is described as ” Maduraiyum Elamum Konda Parakesarivarman” – Parakesarivarman who conquered Madurai and Sri Lanka. He utilized his war loot to cover the roof of the celebrated Shiva Temple at Chidambaram to be covered with Gold, for this he is described as “Thillaiyambalathhukku pon koorai veiyntha thevan”. See Note 3 as well.
Click to expand...

The Times Group

The Chola-Chalukya wars -a series of battles fought from 992 CE to 1120 CE -resulted in the winning Cholas looting the Chalukaya kingdom. Spencer argues that the Cholas needed to engage in these plundering campaigns to let them maintain the flow of resources into their states and strengthen their hold over their local chieftains.
Click to expand...

Raja Raja Chola 1 And The Quicksand Of Tamil Chauvinism

The Archaeological Survey of India, for example, includes reference to inscriptions at various Hindu temples built with the wealth looted from lands conquered by Raja Raja 1. These inscriptions list the names of lands he conquered and refers to the island we today call Sri Lanka as ‘Ila-Mandalam’.
Click to expand...

The Shipping Technology of the Cholas

Of late, some researchers [1] have started throwing doubt on the overseas expedition of Rajaraja Chola through Rajendra Chola on the plea that the Parasasti / Meikkirti could have been written with poetic fantasy rather than the factual accuracy. Even, had Rajendra Cholan gone there, it could have been only a raid to loot and not to set foot as a conqueror!
Click to expand...

Like I said, you owe compensation.
 
BMD said:
I re-direct you to an earlier quote by one of your colleagues.

Opinion - Battle of Saragarhi : When 21 Sikhs Faced Over 10,000 Pashtuns at Saragarhi And Won



Aside from that, empires always looted you dummy. Do you seriously expect the world to believe that Indian medieval empires just happened to be an exception to the rule.

The titles used by the Cholas; An Examination (Part-I)



The Times Group



Raja Raja Chola 1 And The Quicksand Of Tamil Chauvinism



The Shipping Technology of the Cholas



Like I said, you owe compensation.
Click to expand...
Are you such dimwit to not even check what was territory of Chalukya.

Chalukya Kingdom was in India.


So you want India to pay herself for compensation.

Consider it done.
 
Arpit said:
Where I am saying that.

All the things you saying, you saying you are Roman.
Click to expand...
Others on this forum make a big deal of Britain owing compensation to India, so I'm just trolling.

We are Anglo-Roman-Saxon-Norman-Vikings. This would probably explain why we are good at war.
 
Arpit said:
Are you such dimwit to not even check what was territory of India.

Chalukya Kingdom was in India.


So you want India to pay herself for compensation.

Consider it done.
Click to expand...
Nice try, the Chola empire extended well beyond India. Or would you have people believe the Cholas only looted regions that just happened to be inside present-day India?:ROFLMAO:
 
BMD said:
Nice try, the Chola empire extended well beyond India. Or would you have people believe the Cholas only looted regions that just happened to be inside present-day India?:ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...

Are you saying Chola Empire was not subcontinental empire, but a outsider that looting India?
 
BMD said:
Others on this forum make a big deal of Britain owing compensation to India, so I'm just trolling.

We are Anglo-Roman-Saxon-Norman-Vikings. This would probably explain why we are good at war.
Click to expand...
Are you saying you are a martial race?
 
Why don’t we remember the Cholas?

She has said that another reason why the Cholas are not remembered as well as the Mughals is because the historical texts available for the Cholas are far lesser. “Since they existed centuries before the Mughals, we have fewer surviving texts about the Cholas produced outside of India. Records within India tend to be inscriptions, the study of which is left to the specialists.”
Click to expand...
 
Arpit said:
Are you saying Chola Empire was not subcontinental empire, but a outsider that looting India?
Click to expand...
No, it was an Indian empire that looted outside India.

1535215494048.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom