Name the kingdom, battle they fought.No, it was an Indian empire that looted outside India.
Name the kingdom, battle they fought.No, it was an Indian empire that looted outside India.
Yup.So you automatically consider by this Cholas as colonial power?
I have shown you the territories. As Ashwin says, history was not well recorded due to incompetence.Name the kingdom, battle they fought.
In 1025, Rajendra Chola, the Chola king from Tamil Nadu in South India, launched naval raids on ports of Srivijaya in maritime Southeast Asia,[1] and conquered Kadaram (modern Kedah) from Srivijaya and occupied it for some time.
The Cholas are known to have benefitted from both piracy and foreign trade.
Sometimes Chola seafaring led to outright plunder and conquest as far as Southeast Asia.[16] While Srivijaya that controlled two major naval choke points; Malacca and Sunda Strait; at that time was a major trading empire that possess formidable naval forces. Malacca strait's northwest opening was controlled from Kedah on Peninsula side and from Pannai on the Sumatran side, while Malayu (Jambi) and Palembang controlled its southeast opening and also Sunda strait. They practiced naval trade monopoly that forced any trade vessels that passed through their waters to call on their ports or otherwise being plundered.
What territory?I have shown you the territories. As Ashwin says, history was not well recorded due to incompetence.
Srivijaya is in modern-day Indonesia.What territory?
Name the Kingdom in Indonesia and Malaysia which Choloas invaded, and looted them as colonial power. This is so hard to understand ?
Am I speaking in Farsi?
Srivijaya is in modern-day Indonesia.
Chola invasion of Srivijaya - Wikipedia
"In 1025, Rajendra Chola, the Chola king from Tamil Nadu in South India, launched naval raids on ports of Srivijaya in maritime Southeast Asia,[1] and conquered Kadaram(modern Kedah) from Srivijaya and occupied it for some time.
The Cholas are known to have benefitted from both piracy and foreign trade.
Sometimes Chola seafaring led to outright plunder and conquest as far as Southeast Asia.[16] While Srivijaya that controlled two major naval choke points; Malacca and Sunda Strait; at that time was a major trading empire that possess formidable naval forces. Malacca strait's northwest opening was controlled from Kedah on Peninsula side and from Pannai on the Sumatran side, while Malayu (Jambi) and Palembang controlled its southeast opening and also Sunda strait. They practiced naval trade monopoly that forced any trade vessels that passed through their waters to call on their ports or otherwise being plundered."
View attachment 3008
It is beyond your current borders, so it is an invasion. Or are you perhaps admitting that the countries and territories we see today were all made via the acquisition of territory and empire one way or the other.SriVijaya? Duh.
You still dont realize that was Indian kingdom, with Indian name. That was established by Indian population, that gone there through trade routes and exploration.
It is beyond your current borders, so it is an invasion. Or are you perhaps admitting that the countries and territories we see today were all made via the acquisition of territory and empire one way or the other.
Britain is also only a small part of earlier British Empire. Your point?No I am admitting this that India was much larger, and the current India is 60% (geographically) of past India.
Britain is a country, not an empire. British Raj was Empire.Britain is also only a small part of earlier British Empire. Your point?
And congrats to you for defeating 10000 Vikings and then ruled by Germens.Anyway, congrats on beating 10,000 muzzlers.
It comes from 'kuningaz' not Kaiser.And congrats to you for defeating 10000 Vikings and then ruled by Germens.
But shhh, they are still not Kaiser. But King or Queen.
Sometime ago you were Roman, now you trying to justify that you are a Brit?It comes from 'kuningaz' not Kaiser.
Dude, Indonesia is about 2,000 miles across water from India. Are you seriously going to claim the British Empire was different simply because we had better naval vessels? I can see where China gets its SCS claims from now.Britain is a country, not an empire. British Raj was Empire.
As the same India was country and still is. But we lost the part of some country.
If you lost the part of some England, then it would be same. But it is not.
Dude, Indonesia is about 2,000 miles across water from India. Are you seriously going to claim the British Empire was different simply because we had better naval vessels? I can see where China gets its SCS claims from now.
Your history sucks. The French were the last to invade.Sometime ago you were Roman, now you trying to justify that you are a Brit?
BTW, a wonderful job that you guys are ruled by Germans. Kool.
Ohh, poor guy. You dont know, you ruled by Kings or Queen from House of Hanover? Poor chap.Your history sucks. The French were the last to invade.
You live in a country that Britain drew the borders of. Empires, everyone is guilty, try to remember this.
So was Britain. My point is why should Britain somehow owe compensation to India, but not India to Afghanistan, Malaysia, Laos and Indonesia?That is the case.
India was a maritime power, before the decline. Heck, the richest region in whole Indonesia still known as Bali. If you know what I mean.
As I said, the French were last to invade. The Spanish tried but failed. 217 years later we battered them and the French at Trafalgar.Ohh, poor guy. You dont know, you ruled by Kings or Queen from House of Hanover? Poor chap.