Brahmos Supersonic Cruise Missile : News, Updates and Discussions

If the baseline LFRJ is not yet tested once then a far more compact high performance ramjet like what goes in PJ-10 , is very unlikely. Our work has been , based on research papers, mainly on the feed system, flow mass and such ie modifying it for a superior performance related. Actually making the core engine, combustor and proving it is still a long term task. Attention also went to increasing range post MTCR as priority.

Then due to all the huge shenanigans around projects getting delayed, drdo restructure , lack of enough scientists and availability of parts and prioritising certain mission mode projects made sure the entire ramjet related work being in the backburner. Unless full tot based license mfg, no chance of indifying that ramjet. It is also no surprise why the Brahmos mini/NG concept is still a concept 10 years later , assuming it is also ramjet powered.

This year MTAR got the air breathing engine making deal, combustor etc but they say its for scramjet. LFRJ STAR is being integrated so both are still sort of dev stage naturally.
 
Gcork13aEAEJngv


Brahmos 2 will not be happening.
 
BrahMos Aerospace faces turbulence as new CEO’s appointment challenged in tribunal.

Hyderabad/New Delhi: A major leadership controversy has erupted at BrahMos Aerospace following the appointment of Dr Jaiteerth R Joshi as chief executive officer. Dr Sivasubramanyam Nambi Naidu, a distinguished scientist with over three decades of professional experience, has challenged Joshi’s appointment through a legal petition filed at the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in Hyderabad.

The crux of Naidu’s argument centres on allegations of being unjustly superseded in the organization, which makes India’s supersonic cruise missiles, during the selection process, despite being seven years senior to Joshi.

Joshi, an eminent missile scientist with over three decades of experience, assumed the role on December 1. A graduate of Osmania University and holding a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Warangal, he has been instrumental in major Indian missile programs, including Prithvi and Agni. He also played a crucial role in the long-range surface-to-air missile (LRSAM) programme. He has also trained over 600 personnel in advanced non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques.

His technical background positions him as one of the top figures in the country’s defence technological landscape. However, Naidu’s challenge suggests that seniority and experience were potentially overlooked in the appointment process.

Naidu is a highly experienced and senior scientist and technologist in India’s defence sector. He has spent several decades contributing to critical areas of missile development under the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO). His expertise includes systems integration, design, and the development of missile systems like the BrahMos.

He holds the title of “distinguished scientist” – a prestigious designation that reflects his expertise and contributions to the field, and has served as an “outstanding scientist” since 2017 – a role that underscores his leadership in various projects.

He has been recognized for his work in missile systems, particularly as a key figure in the Prithvi missile programme, which was one of India’s first indigenously developed ballistic missiles.

Apart from this, Naidu has extensive managerial experience at Bharat Dynamics Limited, where he oversaw large-scale missile production. His role there involved not just technical expertise but also significant managerial responsibilities, which are crucial for meeting operational and export ambitions of missile systems, like BrahMos.

Naidu, who was a contender for the CEO position, claims he was bypassed despite being equally or more qualified for the role. His petition alleges procedural lapses and a lack of transparency in the selection process, which involved the DRDO and the Russian partner in BrahMos, NPO Mashinostroyeniya.

The tribunal has taken the matter seriously. It has sought a comprehensive response from the DRDO within four weeks. A follow-up hearing is scheduled for December 30, which indicates the gravity of the dispute.

The leadership challenge emerges at a critically sensitive moment for BrahMos Aerospace, which is currently negotiating strategic defence contracts with several international partners, including Indonesia, Vietnam, and the United Arab Emirates. The organization is particularly focused on fulfilling a substantial $375 million contract with the Philippines, which represents a strategic entry point into the Southeast Asian defence market.

Defence experts have expressed concerns that this internal dispute could potentially disrupt BrahMos’s operational capabilities precisely when consistent leadership is most crucial. They fear that the uncertainty surrounding the leadership transition might introduce delays in existing contracts and potentially compromise future international defence negotiations.

A former technocrat who served in a defence public sector undertaking told India Sentinels in the condition of anonymity that the legal challenge extends beyond an individual dispute. It reflects broader governance and transparency questions within public sector appointments, which are often made in a very opaque and sometimes shocking fashion.

He said the outcome of this legal tussle may result in substantial implications for India’s strategic defence initiatives and its emerging reputation as a significant global defence technology manufacturer.

At a time when BrahMos is under pressure to innovate and expand its market presence amid increasing international competition, this leadership dispute represents a potential vulnerability. Joshi’s technical expertise could be instrumental in advancing the organization's capabilities, but the ongoing legal challenge introduces an element of uncertainty.

The challenge to Joshi’s appointment represents a critical moment for BrahMos Aerospace. The resolution of this dispute will not only impact the individuals directly involved but could potentially influence India's broader strategic positioning in the global defence technology market.

The legal proceedings and their eventual outcome will be closely monitored by stakeholders within BrahMos, the defence sector, and international observers interested in India's defence technological ecosystem.


 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashwin

“Zircon” — actually modified “Oniks”?


Russian hypersonic rocket «Zircon» — one of the pillars of Russian propaganda and an object of technological pride. However, is this really «hypersonic » and a new development?

Russian media spoke about the work on the 3M22 anti-ship missile in 2011. Its main advantage was hypersonic speed, which would allow to bypass missile defense systems and unhindered to hit enemy ships.

During all the development and before the tests, Russian agencies never presented models or graphic images «of Zircona», keeping the appearance a secret. And this is understandable, because they can issue general information and a possible flight profile of the rocket.

For the first time, the short-term emergence of top-secret Russian development took place only in 2020, when during the tests of the rocket took off its launch from the frigate «Admiral Gorshkov» in the White Sea waters.


The video shows the launch of a cigar-shaped rocket with a blunt «cap » in the nasal part, similar to those installed on 3M55 missiles «Oniks». The only purpose of this part is — protection of the annular air intake in the nasal part from the entry of foreign objects.

The rocket is started mortally using a solid-fuel accelerator, which outputs the rocket to the flight path and accelerates to the minimum operating speed of the supersonic direct-precision air jet engine.

After working, the starting solid fuel engine burns in the fuselage pipe, and the «cap» in the nasal part is fired, opening the air intake. The main jet engine is then started. The switching moment can be traced to the disappearance of the flame in the tail of the rocket.

The reliable parameters of «Zircon» are unknown, and the stated characteristics are questionable given the propaganda policy of the Russian Ministry of Defense. However, the overall values can be calculated based on the characteristics of the peripheral equipment.

So the universal vertical launcher 3C14 on the frigate «Admiral Gorshkov», from which the launch of the rocket 3M22 was made, has a cell 10 meters high and a meter wide. However, the rocket itself must be smaller, taking into account the tolerances and size of the transport and launch container.

Study of wreckage​

Currently, «Militar » has photos of the combat unit, fuselage elements, cladding and a fuel tank of rockets shot down on March 25 over Kyiv.

The combat unit found is much smaller than that used in similar Russian supersonic anti-ship missiles. According to the dimensions, it reaches 400 mm in diameter and 450 mm in length.

The method of weighing all the found fragments determined that its weight is approaching 150–200 kg, of which the explosive is about 40–80 kg.

The body of the combat part is made of steel. Its walls are quite thin, but closer to the nasal part thicker based on a powerful impact in a collision.

This solution is similar to the design of a semi-armorized BS «Onyx» and traditional for PKR, which is not faced with the task of punching thick armor or concrete fortifications.

Non-detonating combat unit of the downed 3M22 Zircon rocket, March 25, 2024. Photo: t.me/war_home
Unexploded combat unit of the downed 3M22 missile «Zircon», March 25, 2024. Photo: t.me/war_home

The rocket's fuel tank was also found. According to the source, from the detected parts there was the smell of decillin — high-calorie liquid rocket fuel.

Most likely, we are talking about the remnants of its more powerful version «Decylin-M». In 2016, the Russians announced the use of this substance as part of promising samples of hypersonic weapons.

«In recent years the Russian army took for the supply of fuel «Decillin-M», which will increase the range of application of strategic cruise missiles by 250—300 km. It is planned to be used as fuel for jet engines of new hypersonic strategic winged missilest», — stated Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Dmitry Bulgakov.

It is worth noting that the fuel compartment cladding is made, in particular, from unknown composites. Also in the photo you can see the top «soft » layer of unknown material, which can be part of the heat interface for insulation from heating, which occurs when flying in a dense atmosphere at supersonic speeds.

Residues of the fuel tank of the 3M22 Zircon rocket, March 25, 2024.
Residues of the 3M22 rocket fuel tank «Zircon», March 25, 2024

Another large missile wreck was identified as the tail of «Zircona». She and her flaps are made of titanium, like most other missile nodes.

Despite the broken flaps visually, the tail part repeats the contours of the rocket «Oniks». However, it should be noted that this part has a number of small differences.

Tail part 3M55 Onyks and the downed Russian rocket 3M22 Zircon.
Tail part 3M55 «Oniks» and a downed Russian rocket 3M22 «Zircon»

Summing up the information obtained from the wreckage, rocket launch footage and analyzing the previously published Ukrainian institute KNDIS report on the wreckage February «Zircona», you can draw certain conclusions.

First of all, «Zircon» is equipped with a liquid direct-fuel jet engine. There are currently no images of the surviving nose of the rocket, but based on other signs, it can be assumed that it contains a ring air intake that passes through the entire rocket to the jet engine.

Constructively, the rocket is made according to the classic scheme with the placement of guidance and explosive systems in the main part, the fuel tank in the center and the engine in the stern. Its dimensions are previously located within 8—9 meters.

The above description indicates that this rocket is a deep modification of 3M55 «Onyx». However, there are also significant differences: it widely uses titanium alloys and composites, the diameter of the main part is slightly smaller than most of the hull, the combat part is much lighter than that used in 3M55.

In addition, most of the wreckage found factory laser engraving «3M22», «3L22», which eloquently indicates the type of ammunition used.

Reconstruction of the 3M22 rocket by found wreckage (KNIDSE) and a graphic model of the 3M55 Onyx rocket.
Reconstruction of the 3M22 rocket by found wreckage (KNIDSE) and a graphic model of the 3M55 rocket «Onyks»

Flight profile and interception «Zircons»​

On March 25, 3M22 missiles shot down the Patriot PAC-3 anti-aircraft complex. They were launched from the Crimean peninsula and covered a distance of about 600 kilometers, reaching the capital of Ukraine.

Given the lack of reports from the local population about sea launches, it can be assumed that they were made from terrestrial mobile installations. To do this, probably involved a prototype of a new missile complex for «Zircons», which was manufactured in 2022.

The profile of the rocket's flight is still unknown. However, according to its own sources «Militar », in the final section of the flight, the speed of the rocket is reduced to 3 Machs, so it is possible to shoot down.

The sharp deceleration can be explained by the need for the rocket to escape from «plasma clouds », which is formed from the heating of the hull when flying in dense layers of the atmosphere at hypersonic speeds (>5 Mach). This plasma forms a «impenetrable » cocoon for radio radiation, so the rocket does not have any connection and the ability to use a radar guidance system.

For its part, this may also be an indirect confirmation of the use of active radar GSN in «Zircona». Its use was expected given the main task set in front of the rocket: the fight against enemy ships.

For words the head of the KSDIS military research laboratory, Andriy Kulchytsky, the use of «Zircons» revealed their low accuracy, as they were not used for direct use.

Indeed, given the validity of the use in «Zirconi» guidance system with ARLGSN and inertial system, its ability to accurately strike ground targets will remain limited. In practice, the error of such a rocket can reach 300 meters.

Is it «Zircon» or «Oniks»?​

Based on the data obtained, it can be reasonably assumed that the 3M22 missiles used in Ukraine are a further development of the still Soviet supersonic anti-ship missile 3M55 «Oniks», which was created in the late 1970s. This significantly changes the view of this rocket, refuting the thesis about the use of hypersonic glider and technology Scramjet.

The new speed characteristics of the rocket, which significantly exceeded the capabilities of «Onyx », were most likely achieved due to the significant relief of the rocket, which even included a reduction in the combat unit. The new rocket was also to produce more powerful fuel and a new straight-facing engine focused on higher speeds.

Higher speed «Zircona» means that Ukrainian air defense calculations have less time to respond in the event of a shelling, but the missile still remains within reach for Western missile defense systems.
 
Man! These videos are really teasing us regarding BrahMos2😉

As per reports, it seems BrahMos-II has been de-prioritized and/or abandoned.


"Parallelly, there was a plan to develop a hypersonic version of the already-inducted conventional (non-nuclear) ramjet-powered BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles, which fly at Mach 2.8 speed with a 450-km strike range, developed with Russia. But this will be an expensive proposition and is not on the cards at present, an official said."

If at all we're still intent on getting a Scramjet-based air-breathing HCM, it's gonna have to come from a development of the indigenous HSTDV program. Maybe we've made some breakthroughs therein, hence determined that the expense on Russian collaboration isn't worth it.
 
Frankly, the entire prospect of that one was built on same JV principle, that Rus would supply the scramjet, fuel, possibly some of the material (airframe, ablative coating, alloys used inside the scramjet etc) but given the complexity obviously the cost quoted by them would push unit price very high, no matter what remains in our workshare part. each unit price would be somewhere at 15-30million a piece.

Couple with that we are quite advanced in hypersonics research, theory part, and been running own program. Few niggling areas are mostly on the availability/development of suitable material related. So it made little sense to proceed with the jv option with pricing front alone and that DRDO is working on the core Brahmos to 800km itself step by step. That means we have almost all the enabling tech part ourselves. Why go by jv route ?
 
I had my doubts whether a scramjet HCM (Zircon) could have the same form factor as Onyx. I'd assumed that Russian MoD footage claiming to be a Zircon lifting off from a surface ship VLS (Grigorivich class?) was actually a Onyx. Seems the Russians may already have developed a hypersonic (Mach 5) Onyx variant that DRDO/BrahMos Corp are seeking to do with PJ-10.
 

Vietnam, India close to finalising BrahMos deal


India and Vietnam are closer than ever to signing a USD 700 million Brahmos missile system deal as both sides plug in more procedural details. The deal could be signed as early as in a couple of months, and it is learnt that the initial techno-commercial details have already been shared and discussed by the Vietnamese Defence Ministry. Orders are expected from both the Vietnamese Army and Navy.

BrahMos missile is developed by BrahMos Aerospace, a collaboration between India's Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and Russia's NPO Mashinostroyeniya.

If this deal materialises, then Vietnam will be the second country after the Philippines to purchase the BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles from India.

Vietnam, it is understood, has been waiting for some time for the draft agreement, which includes the final deal amount, delivery timeline, payment terms, etc., from BrahMos Aerospace (BAPL).

The development comes at a time when Brahmos's top brass faces leadership challenges over the appointment of new CEO and MD, Dr. Jaiteerth Raghavendra Joshi.

Dr. Sivasubramanyam Nambi Naidu has legally challenged Dr. Jaiteerth R. Joshi's appointment as CEO of BrahMos Aerospace, citing issues of seniority and merit.

The case, filed at the Central Administrative Tribunal in Hyderabad, has its next hearing scheduled in a few days. While talks over Brahmos have taken place, Vietnam in the past procured Bastion-P (K-300P) coastal defence missile systems from Russia, with the first delivery occurring in 2011.
India and Vietnam have been firming up defence ties. Earlier this week, the India Pavilion at Vietnam International Defence Expo VIDE24 was jointly inaugurated by Vietnam’s Minister of Public Security, Gen Luong Tam Quang, Indian Secretary-Defence Production, Sanjeev Kumar, and Indian Ambassador to Vietnam, Sandeep Arya.

VIDE24 showcases the latest global defence technologies, including those from India. Brahmos Aerospace from India was one of the exhibitors, along with DRDO, HAL, and Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders.

India's Vice Chief of the Army Staff, Lieutenant General N. S. Raja Subramani, is also on a visit to the country and attended VIDE 2024. During the official visit to Vietnam, Lieutenant General NS Raja Subramani attended the 80th Anniversary of the Vietnam People’s Army (VPA) at the National Convention Centre, Hanoi.

An Army statement said, "This visit further strengthens collaboration between the armies of the two nations, which is grounded in strategic collaboration and trust and is crucial for enhancing security in the Indo-Pacific, thereby ensuring a stable and prosperous region for all."
In 2022, India handed 12 high-speed guard boats to Vietnam, built under India's $100 million Defence Line of Credit. The following year, India announced the gifting of an indigenously built missile corvette, INS Kirpan, to Vietnam. Both countries have a mutual logistics support agreement that allows use of each other's military bases for repair and replenishment. India has also been training Vietnamese personnel.

A 50-member Indian defence contingent participated in the fourth edition of the VINBAX – 2023 military exercises in Vietnam in December 2023 on UN peacekeeping scenario. Vietnam’s navy ship participated in international maritime exercise MILAN in India in February 2024.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parthu