That doesn't account for natural resources. We have oil reserves equal to 4.8x annual consumption and gas reserves equal to 2.6x. Total value $1.2tr.The net worth of the UK, taking into account its debts, is £10.7 trillion in 2020, which is €12.20 trillion, while France's net worth, also taking into account its debts, is €18.97 trillion. This explains the very advantageous conditions we have when we borrow.
WAIT one second. German values in multiples of GDP are 5.3, 4.2 and 5.4, yet the overall multiple is 6.0????
Equally, UK values are 5.1, 5.3 and 11.5 but overall multiple is 4.8.
This chart is meaningless unless somebody can provide the full maths behind it and a breakdown of the figures for each country.
Industrial asset would fall under 'asset of non-financial corporation'.Because German industrial asset alone is worth a trillion pound which is may be little more than England's.
Nominal GDP is divided by this deflator, yielding real GDP. Nominal GDP is usually higher than real GDP because inflation is typically a positive number.
Please list these liabilities.So let me explain a little:
As far as natural resources are concerned, this is well taken into account:
It's in AN.2 non-produced non-financial, item AN.21 Natural resources, AN212 Mineral and energy reserves.
As far as GDP multipliers are concerned, each component of the value is a multiple of GDP and therefore the total value is the sum of the three, for Germany for example the values are 5.3; 4.2; and 5.4 which makes a total value of 14.9. But then you have to subtract the financial liabilities and this total reduces to 6.
For the value of our companies it is because we own a lot of companies, or shares of companies abroad, it is a consequence of our history, by the way the UK too.
And per capita UK 195/218 and France 296/355, I think it's quite different.
Please list these liabilities.
Monetary gold and special drawing rights (SDRs) |
Currency and deposits |
Debt securities |
Loans |
Equity and investment fund shares |
Listed shares |
Insurance, pension and standardised guarantee schemes |
Financial derivatives and employee stock options |
Other accounts receivable/payable |
You know, McKinsey&Company is not French !!Seems to me that your assets are overvalued, particularly property.
Yep, you've had twice the increase in real estate stock relative to GDP.
"Nearly all net worth growth from 2000 to 2020 occurred in the household sector as a result of growing equity and real estate valuations"
199% vs 111%
At the end of the day, only revenue on GDP pays for debt, and you are worse than us on that score. The rest is just based on highly questionable valuations (i.e. estimates), not real data.
Please list the values and how they're counted.
Monetary gold and special drawing rights (SDRs) Currency and deposits Debt securities Loans Equity and investment fund shares Listed shares Insurance, pension and standardised guarantee schemes Financial derivatives and employee stock options Other accounts receivable/payable
Doesn't affect what I said.You know, McKinsey&Company is not French !!
Look at it this way. A house might with worth £500k on paper but if the owner doesn't keep up mortgage payments and the bank needs to foreclose it at an auction, you ain't getting £500k for it. Likely you only get half of that. And if your real estate is overvalued anyway because its gone up twice as much as everyone else's, well.... Couple that to the dubious valuation of French corporations relative to more productive German ones and I wouldn't place much stock in this report at all.BMD better than McKinsey&Company to evaluate countries' net worth !
And you know how to take this into account better than McKinsey&Company? It's just an excuse to justify your biases.Look at it this way. A house might with worth £500k on paper but if the owner doesn't keep up mortgage payments and the bank needs to foreclose it at an auction, you ain't getting £500k for it. Likely you only get half of that. And if your real estate is overvalued anyway because its gone up twice as much as everyone else's, well.... Couple that to the dubious valuation of French corporations relative to more productive German ones and I wouldn't place much stock in this report at all.
Fact. You can't pay debts with the hypothetical valuations of non-liquid assets. And French companies being valued higher than German ones, despite only half the productivity does not make sense to anyone. If value is so high, why is productivity so low and debt so high?And you know how to take this into account better than McKinsey&Company? It's just an excuse to justify your biases.