Look how well deficit and inflation have been controlled during that time.
Inflation has been hovering between 4.5-8% within that period. [source:
https://cpi.mospi.gov.in/Inflation_CurrentSeries_2012.aspx].
Fiscal deficits have been maintained at levels similar to those under the UPA between 2014-24 excluding the 9.2% of GDP spike in 2020. [source:
https://openbudgetsindia.org/dataset/union-budget-at-a-glance-timeseries]
And revenues have grown more or less at the same rate as under the UPA (with both governments trebling revenues in 10 years) [source:
https://openbudgetsindia.org/dataset/union-budget-at-a-glance-timeseries]
But, the government debt to GDP ratio has gone up [2004-2005: 84.9% | 2014-15: 67% | 2019-20: 75% | 2024-25: 82.5%] (including the 2008 crash and COVID).
And this is while the education and health care budgets have essentially stagnated
since the pandemic (or in the case of health care, reduced in real terms).
The increase in defense, again factoring in inflation, has been rather modest. Not quite the economic miracle it would seem.
That's why Congress believes this election was a win, they managed to stop BJP/NDA going across 362 seats in LS, never mind 400-paar, which even I considered a joke before the elections.
Thankfully.
No, its just flawed and regressive, especially with the way the GST council functions.
Like the one that just collapsed?
That aside, like you say, there's a need for heroes. The direction things are headed towards right now would lead to personality cults. These are different and the latter is dangerous.
These require detailed, meticulous plans, that are made keeping schedules/deadlines etc. in mind, which isn't something the current lot of Vishwagurus have a great track record of doing, at least not in defense and foreign policy.
What's gonna happen now is the deliberate end of the middle class in the West.
Oh, austerity was the accidental end of the middle class, but what's going to happen now is the deliberate end of the already ended middle class.
You mean how the reforms carried out by BJP carried into the first few years of UPA, but the UPA failed to capitalize on it and pretty much collapsed the economy all over again?
No, how the reforms carried out by the congress carried into the BJP years and they messed up pretty much every economic indicator, which managed to improve under the economic collapse the UPA engineered.
By what metrics did the UPA collapse the economy anyway?
The PM represents the Tories, not a few stragglers.
Boris Johnson and Liz Truss were also PMS in the conservative party, who led conservative governments and were voted to party leadership and therefore power by the conservative party members. Boris Johnson beat Jeremy Hunt by almost 2:1 in the hustings, just by campaigning on a hard Brexit platform. Similarly, Liz Truss beat Rishi Sunak in the party hustings.
It wasn't the stragglers, it was an overwhelming majority of the rank-and-file "Tories" who voted in the more incompetent candidate every time around in their leadership hustings.
So which PM you're talking about needs to be specified. Is it the one who was forced to resign because her Brexit wasn't hard enough for the conservative party (Theresa May), or the man who became the poster child of incompetence and mismanagement (Boris Johnson), or the one who melted the markets and lost to lettuce (Liz Truss), or the one who came in without a party election since they couldn't trust the party cadre not to repeat the same mistakes (Rishi Sunak)?
Also, it's funny that somehow the hard Brexiteers are the stragglers when they pretty much held pretty important cabinet assignments and parliamentary posts throughout all post-2016 conservative governments.
And just to repeat, it was the conservative governments (including the one of Theresa May) that repeatedly flat-out refused to even entertain freedom of movement with the EU at any level.
Look at what's happening in Germany now.
Yeah, what's happening is the rise of an openly neo-nazi party, that feeds on anger over economic mismanagement, and directs it at the "others". Pretty similar to what their idols, the nazis, had originally done in the Weimar Republic.
Japan and S Koreans are not leftists. They are extremely conservative societies and value culture.
The DPK, Kim Young Sam, Kim Dae Jung, Roh Moo Hyun, Moon Jae In, Lee Jae Myung etc. would like a word. These "extremely conservative societies" are over 60% non-religious, perform among the best in most metrics of gender equality, and have generous schemes in education, healthcare, social welfare, etc. that would get immediately classified as communist/leftist/freebie policies here. But okay.
Can't make significant policy changes without supermajority. Land and labor law changes are critical to that.
No part of a semi-decent industrial policy targeting high-value manufacturing like batteries, displays, semiconductors, electronics, etc. requires a de-facto dictatorship. India's labor protection laws are already questionable in their provisions for workplace safety, over-exploitation, wage guarantees, working hours, and compensations. It might sound cool and inspirational but having your workers grind for 72 hours a week at minimal salaries isn't an economically or socially sound idea.
Sure, we have a labor surplus. Manpower is our greatest export. That's also why we have the highest remittances.
And the highest amount of lost talent as well. There's nothing to take pride in sending your students to foreign universities to get industrially educated since you don't invest in your colleges. You're just losing the talent you have in-house because you didn't plan out a lot of high-value sectors that will pay those students well.
Oh, and the manpower being exported to a place like Canada is neither great nor something to be proud of.
Raise all the questions you want. But most people only have stupid things to say.
Or maybe most people are simply not as sensitive or receptive as you to having their assumptions or beliefs being questioned.
We need 10-15 years of BJP and 5 years of Congress.
Not the OP, but probably the best is to have alternating governments every 5 years, or at a maximum,10 years. The moment any party becomes too entrenched or comfortable, the rot begins.
England/Wales vs Scotland/Ireland. That was the vote division. Not conservatives or leftists.
The vote division was conservative/liberals to some extent, with more conservatives preferring Brexit and more liberals preferring Remain. But the vote division was also along socio-economic lines, with the older, less educated, rural, and lower-income people preferring to leave and the urban, younger, richer people preferring to remain.
Public opinion on Brexit aligns with attitudes toward the EU, immigration and culture.
www.pewresearch.org
Which is why Leave didn't overwhelmingly win in England or Wales.
Someday people here will understand that politicians' words and actions are not 'always' aligned.
Someday people here will also understand that the above is even true for politicians who happen to share their visceral hatred of certain people
(case in point, Rishi Sunak's multiple flip-flops on multiple issues).
Wake up, sheeple. There's a reason why the UAE's Rafale deal is on the fritz.
Irony's died a thousand deaths.