Reliable by Indian journalism standards. There you happy now ?Once he reported Barak 8 failed looking at its trajectory. But it was going for a low flying kill.
Also, QRSAM is Tank buster apparently.
Reliable by Indian journalism standards. There you happy now ?Once he reported Barak 8 failed looking at its trajectory. But it was going for a low flying kill.
Also, QRSAM is Tank buster apparently.
THREAD!!
Frankly, posted it here as I didn't find another appropriate heading to post it under.
It's similar to Russian air defences and not NASAMS.
If each truck has its own radar and 8 missiles, it's similar to the Tor-M1 system.
They displayed it last year Aero India.
THREAD!!
Frankly, posted it here as I didn't find another appropriate heading to post it under.
Similar to how? Its their own design. Inspiration is clearly Russian self-propelled air defense systems.No it is similar to Israeli idome system , vem has tie up with the said Israeli company
They displayed it last year Aero India.
Similar to how? Its their own design. Inspiration is clearly Russian self-propelled air defense systems.
I wonder how many types of SAMs will IBGs carry. There are already QRSAMs. What role will this play in IBGs? I thought this was more needed as fast mobile platforms for air defence of large areas of strategic importance like cities, power plants, manufacturing centres, air force bases , etcBeautiful product, we should work on this for the integrated battle group
I guessed it for IBG... since the size of the missiles will be smaller (as per image) may carry QRSAM but work autonomously without any surveillance radar which helps your IBG to maintain a smaller and effective packageI wonder how many types of SAMs will IBGs carry. There are already QRSAMs. What role will this play in IBGs? I thought this was more needed as fast mobile platforms for air defence of large areas of strategic importance like cities, power plants, manufacturing centres, air force bases , etc
No it is similar to Israeli idome system , vem has tie up with the said Israeli company Rafael
Beautiful product, we should work on this for the integrated battle group
No, none of the air defense systems described here (QRSAM,Akash,MRSAM) are designed to be used with moving strike corps/IBGs.I have a few questions. The qrsams and mr-sams of the Indian Army are going to provide air defence cover for the mobile and rapidly moving armoured formations of the strike corps/IBGs. These systems are mounted on wheeled trucks and the various components such as launchers and different kinds of radars are mounted on different platforms meaning one truck carries the launcher, one truck one type of radar, another truck carries another type of radar. Won't this prove cumbersome? Like operationally and logistically speaking. What if one truck were to break down. Wouldn't the operational capability of the whole system be affected considering the fact that these systems are supposed to keep up with the fast paced thrust of the armoured offensive formations. Also these armoured thrusts are all about quick and decisive attacks with the element of surprise coupled with shock and awe tactics. That means these systems will have to be able to deploy almost instantaneously with less deployment time or even fire on the go to keep up with the frontline forces. Are these systems capable of doing that? Looking at them, I feel like due to the complicated organisation of these systems, with different components mounted on different platforms, their deployment time or rather, the time taken up for positioning the various launchers and radars in a particular area and setting up firing position won't be as fast as required. Also unlike the Akash SAM or the older KUB systems, they're mounted on trucks and not caterpillar tracked platforms. Will they be able to keep up with the rapidly moving tank and icv formations across difficult and challenging terrain?
No, none of the air defense systems described here (QRSAM,Akash,MRSAM) are designed to be used with moving strike corps/IBGs.
Older generation SAM systems used to be stationary with elaborate sites designed to protect an area.
For example, This is the layout of a now-defunct SA-2 deployment location in North West Delhi.
Those were easy to locate and target. Newer generation of air defense systems became mobile. It can protect any area as you prioritize. Today its protecting Delhi tomorrow it can protect Pathankot.
But, It cannot operate on the move. It should be deployed first to secure the air space. For that role we have , 9K33 Osa (SA-8 Gecko) 9K35 Strela-10 (SA-13 Gopher) , Schilka and Tunguska.
Akash can be relocated in time but cannot be used in offensive operations. Being mobile just makes it harder to destroy.
Footnote: QR-SAM can be operated in short halts. Basically, its quick to react even if you are moving.
Relevant discussion: Indian Army Air Defence Corps : Updates & Discussions