Funny Stuff

Guynextdoor said:
@_Anonymous_ gets away by speaking half truths.

When Bhabiji (his wife) asked him yesterday 'why are you spending so much quality time with Basanti'
he just said 'I'm only milking her honey'

He never said that Basanti was milking him too....big time.... ;)

So he gets away by telling truth but not the whole truth..... :)
Click to expand...
Do remember to write Punchline after delivering it, so that we tickle ourselves and laugh.
 
Guynextdoor said:
we weren't expecting you to laugh now that the joke's on you....:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::LOL::LOL::LOL:
Click to expand...
Can't tell what's more silly. You or your so called jokes. But then again you're brain damaged just like your white counterpart BMD. His is of course a hereditary case. OTOH, I always thought toddy tapping requires some intelligence.
 
Guynextdoor said:
we weren't expecting you to laugh now that the joke's on you....:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::LOL::LOL::LOL:
Click to expand...
Pour soul had a hearing impediment. His friends asked if he wanted to go cow tipping and then looked on in horror as he began tapping cows.
 
_Anonymous_ said:
The Real Cuban Missile Crisis
Click to expand...
Kennedy never wanted the Jupiter missiles in Italy or Turkey because they were outdated and they had better missiles in the UK. They were to be removed anyway but were already in situ and fully operational. The Soviet missiles were actually uptodate missiles but they couldn't bring in the equipment needed to operate them due to the naval blockade, so they were inoperable. The Soviet's had a choice between starting a naval war with the US on its doorstep to try bring in the missiles, which would have surely failed, or backing down and they backed down. A perfectly calculated gambit. Later on Pershing I and Pershing IIs were placed in Europe and nothing was placed in Cuba.
 
BMD said:
Kennedy never wanted the Jupiter missiles in Italy or Turkey because they were outdated and they had better missiles in the UK. They were to be removed anyway but were already in situ and fully operational. The Soviet missiles were actually uptodate missiles but they couldn't bring in the equipment needed to operate them due to the naval blockade, so they were inoperable. The Soviet's had a choice between starting a naval war with the US on its doorstep to try bring in the missiles, which would have surely failed, or backing down and they backed down. A perfectly calculated gambit. Later on Pershing I and Pershing IIs were placed in Europe and nothing was placed in Cuba.
Click to expand...
The issue here is not whether JFK succeeded. He didn't. As part of the bargain he dismantled US missiles in Europe. You being you can spin it into those missiles were obsolete crap.That the US based Pershing missiles in Europe more than two decades later is irrelevant. By that time the USSR had built up a substantial fleet of SSBNs. Which in turn was lacking or hardly sophisticated in the early 1960's. JFK & his hagiographers like you have been spinning this into the triumph it never was since then.
 
_Anonymous_ said:
The issue here is not whether JFK succeeded. He didn't. As part of the bargain he dismantled US missiles in Europe. You being you can spin it into those missiles were obsolete crap.That the US based Pershing missiles in Europe more than two decades later is irrelevant. By that time the USSR had built up a substantial fleet of SSBNs. Which in turn was lacking or hardly sophisticated in the early 1960's. JFK & his hagiographers like you have been spinning this into the triumph it never was since then.
Click to expand...
They were obsolete crap, even your link says so. Kennedy wanted those missiles gone anyway. There were still Thor missiles in striking distance of the USSR even with the Jupiters gone. The Soviet missile in Cuba were not operational and the Soviets couldn't risk trying to break the blockade. They would have easily lost a naval engagement right next to the US mainland and the only comeback option was a nuclear, and as your link mentioned there was a huge missile and bomber and fighter gap in favour of the US at the time, so they would have been crucified in a nuclear engagement in 1962.

At the time of the missile crisis, the Soviets had 36 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), 138 long-range bombers with 392 nuclear warheads, and 72 submarine-launched ballistic-missile warheads (SLBMs). These forces were arrayed against a vastly more powerful U.S. nuclear arsenal of 203 ICBMs, 1,306 long-range bombers with 3,104 nuclear warheads, and 144 SLBMs—all told, about nine times as many nuclear weapons as the U.S.S.R. Nikita Khrushchev was acutely aware of America’s huge advantage not just in the number of weapons but in their quality and deployment as well.
Click to expand...

The whole point in basing missiles in Cuba was to try rebalance the huge missile gap, so bringing down a 9-fold missile strike on their heads was hardly a plan or a credible gambit and their navy was dead in the water if it tried anything. They had no cards left to play.

Pershing Is were deployed in Europe merely years later. It was a deployment that the Soviets, who'd learned there lesson, didn't try match.
MGM-31 Pershing - Wikipedia

So by the end of it, Thors and Jupiters were still deployed in Europe until 1963 and Pershings were deployed thereafter. No Soviet missiles in Cuba ever became operational. Where is the loss for Kennedy here? Kennedy, being smart, just gave them something to make them think they'd salvaged something and could save face. Later on, Pershing IIs were deployed in Europe and the USSR again didn't try to place missiles in Cuba.
 
Absolute Killer!!!

😎The difference between *Oo* and *oO*

Paddy & Nick appear in court in Dublin after being arrested for smoking dope.
The judge says, "You seem like nice young men, and I'd like to give you a second chance instead of jail time.
I want you to go out this weekend and try to convince others of the evils of drug use.
I'll see you back in court Monday.
"On Monday, the judge asks Mick , "How did you do over the weekend?
""Well, your honor, I persuaded 17 people to give up drugs forever.
""Seventeen people? That's wonderful. How did you do it? "
"I used a diagram, your honor.
I drew two circles like this: *O o*.
Then I told them that the big circle is your brain before drugs and the small circle is your brain after drugs."
"That's admirable," says the judge.
Then he turns to the Paddy "And how did you do?"
"Well, your honor, I persuaded 156 people to give up drugs forever."
"Wow!" says the judge. "156 people! How did you manage to do that?"
"Well, I used a similar diagram," the guy says.
"I drew two circles like this: *o O*.
Then I pointed to the little circle and said, 'This is your *censored* before prison in Dublin.................."
😂😂😂😂😂
 
New movie.
The Twilight Saga : Shit Got Real
1558014933750.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom