I am big fan of your puns in regular thread .. I often wonder you have kept correct Avatar LMAO..
I sort of wanted to see what u have posted in funny stuff..
Why isn't BBC news presented by such PYT's in tiny numbers instead of the hags and fags they employ ?Lately I've found myself very curious about what the weather was like two years ago in Mexico and I still have no idea.
Because unfortunately people in the UK are selected based on qualifications rather than ar5e and tits.Why isn't BBC news presented by such PYT's in tiny numbers instead of the hags and fags they employ ?
I'm sure if the vitriol they spit out against India would be more acceptable if such pretty ones presented it .
We can see their "qualifications " in the quality of the news reports that they file on India , SA , SEA , Africa & Latin America . Those "qualifications " must be of a very high order indeed.Because unfortunately people in the UK are selected based on qualifications rather than ar5e and tits.
Well occasionally they're selected based on equal opportunity quotas too. So that may be a factor. However, it does make sense that we don't like to see Muslims displaced from their natural homelands, because when they are, they usually end up here and no good comes of it. I guess what I'm trying to say is stop fly-tipping.We can see their "qualifications " in the quality of the news reports that they file on India , SA , SEA , Africa & Latin America . Those "qualifications " must be of a very high order indeed.
I guess what I'm trying to say is stop fly-tipping.
What's the connection between Muslims and the quality of those "highly qualified " BBC reporters & editors ? Can you explain , O'Hara ?Well occasionally they're selected based on equal opportunity quotas too. So that may be a factor. However, it does make sense that we don't like to see Muslims displaced from their natural homelands, because when they are, they usually end up here and no good comes of it. I guess what I'm trying to say is stop fly-tipping.
You mean the BBC is an equal opportunity offender . Sounds fair . Buggery after all is a fine British tradition .And institution. No ethnicity would be more familiar with it than the Irish . Cheers !Well occasionally they're selected based on equal opportunity quotas too
I hope you're at least as pretty as that Mexican weather girl because you're really not the quickest.What's the connection between Muslims and the quality of those "highly qualified " BBC reporters & editors ? Can you explain , O'Hara ?
Buggery was an Indian tradition long before, as was widow-burning. It was only section 377 of the Indian Penal Code in 1861 that stopped it. And to think you complain about famines.You mean the BBC is an equal opportunity offender . Sounds fair . Buggery after all is a fine British tradition .And institution. No ethnicity would be more familiar with it than the Irish . Cheers !
Coming from you , an Irishman , I'd take it as a compliment.I hope you're at least as pretty as that Mexican weather girl because you're really not the quickest.
Yes.But the Brits thought it necessary to legislate . Gives you a clue how familiar the scene was to your "forefathers " & the associated guilt .Buggery was an Indian tradition long before, as was widow-burning. It was only section 377 of the Indian Penal Code in 1861 that stopped it. And to think you complain about famines.
Post if you know anything about Indian history , dont post half baked facts. Do you have stats of how many widows were burnt?Buggery was an Indian tradition long before, as was widow-burning. It was only section 377 of the Indian Penal Code in 1861 that stopped it. And to think you complain about famines.
It was a change in global culture that led to the British leaving. You didn't 'bugger' anyone except each other and burnt widows. The Indian government even had to regulate against Sati as late as 1988.Yes.But the Brits thought it necessary to legislate . Gives you a clue how familiar the scene was to your "forefathers " & the associated guilt .
We buggered the Brits so well that within 2 centuries , they scrammed , bringing the date of Independence ahead by a full 8-9 months . Something that took the Irish next door to England 7 centuries to undertake .
Did the Irish take a liking to the English and their "traditions ?" Me thinks yes.
It should be, since their average IQ is 30 points up on yours and their GDP/Capita is many dozens of times yours.Coming from you , an Irishman , I'd take it as a compliment.
You must also read up more on Hindu society in the medieval era , Paddy O'Brien. Windows were prohibited from re marriage , O'Shea .All the widows were burnt in some provinces, no wonder your population didn't grow. It was conducted for over 1000 years.