Wow...here we're talking about design and planform and you bring IRST into mix. Nice to deny what I and now even the French believe about the aerodynamics/VLO combo of Felon.The Su-57 has a giant IRST ball on the front that has a higher RCS than an F-22, even if the rest of the plane didn't exist.
Probably the best news for France ! We have all the technology, the germans not.
Probably the best news for France ! We have all the technology, the germans not.
About the fighter of the SCAF whole system the germans want a far too big share seeing their skills, and they put Spain in the game with a 33% share !
An the other hand, they decided not to study the future main battle tanks with KNDS, but also with Rheinmetal ! And now they decided to put on the market another version of Leo2, twith a high risk of drying the market af the MGS !
Add Tiger mk3, MAWS etc... failures.
STOP !
1) they will NEVER have a 33% share as expected in SCAF.With 150+ F-35's, they can get quite a bit of production, enough to also become a partner in the program.
1) they will NEVER have a 33% share as expected in SCAF.
2) a partner? All the good places are already taken.
3) F35 is a bad born bird. I'm afraid of anothr F104 story, in Switzerland, Belgium, Finland....
Israel is a special case.Yeah, it's impossible for them to be a 33% partner, but the Germans can ask for their own version, like the Israelis. And 150-200 would give them significant amounts of production. If not, you will have to suggest an alternative.
Israel is a special case.
Germany, as UK, Australia... will have the legacy model. Nothing more.
150 to 200 birds? It is a too weak bird for a proper air dominance. F35 is at roots a CAS fighter. They need another real fighter (as Israel with F15)
A (confirmed ???) news about main battle tank in Europe, with a direct affect on SCAF :
An agreement seemed to have been found between Germany, Spain, Italy ans Sweden about the improvement of Leo2.
This may be another big nail in the MGS coffin.
No MGS => No NGF (the fighter of the SCAF program)
The germans will take their times : they have the Leo2 assembly line open, and want to take the maximum market share possible. So for them there is no hurry to have MGS.It's not a good idea for France to quit MGS just 'cause the Germans are making stopgap arrangements though. MGS is for the future, post 2040. It will replace a lot of existing tanks, and even the new improved tanks being bought today. Countries will be buying MGS even in 2060. Unlike fighters, tanks have a much longer market dominance.
The germans will take their times : they have the Leo2 assembly line open, and want to take the maximum market share possible. So for them there is no hurry to have MGS.
France don't have a MBT assembly line, and too few Leclerc to upgrade.
I think Germany expect France to purchase Leo2.... (why not if they purchase Rafale for exemple...LOL). And for them MGS is now mainly a new technology R&D effort, 50% paid by France.
It's not satisfactory for France. We don't have the german time. Sole positiv point : it seems that France top brass are now aware of the situation and where the germans want to drive us.
Don't worry. I think that the saoudis know already that Stolz won't go with the GCAP.lol
Germany may abandon €100bn fighter jet project with France
Germany is considering abandoning its flagship €100 billion future combat jet project with France and joining a rival programme with Britain instead, The Timeswww.thetimes.co.uk
lmao
This increases the likelihood that we will sell the Rafale to Saudi Arabia, because if Germany were to join the GCAP it is likely that it would authorise the sale of Typhoons to the Saudis, the unpleasant counterpart being that they will not leave the SCAF.GCAP won't have them after the Saudi Typhoon fiasco.