General News, Questions And Discussions - Indian Navy

INS Sindhukesari rolled out after a second refit at Severodvinsk, Russia
calm-before-the-storm.jpg


INS Sindhukesari is the first Kilo-class submarine of the Indian Navy which is undergoing the second refit and modernisation with the life extension. The second refit adds ten years to 25-year specified service life of the submarine.

men-of-valor.jpg


Men of Valor
A large amount of India-made equipment and systems are installed on this submarine. The duration of the refit cycle is 27 months.

final-touches.jpg


Final Touches
INS Sindhukesari will be the first Indian Kilo-class submarine whose service life will be not less than 35 years. Operating and combat characteristics of the ship will be improved as well.

extending-the-lifeline.jpg


Calm Before The Storm
India officially expressed its intention to sign a contract for MRLC (Medium Refit with Life Certification) program in September 2013. The Indian Ministry of Defence made the request for repair determination of INS Sindhukesari in June 2014.

Extending The Lifeline
INS Sindhukesari was transported from India to Russia onboard a heavy load carrier vessel. The route lasted around the southern top end of Africa, through Atlantic ocean, Northern, Barents and White seas. On June 15, 2016, the vessel entered Severodvinsk’s port.

Heart of the Matter
INS Sindhukesari underwent medium repair at the Admiralty shipyards in 1999-2001 including Club-S complex installation.

gestation-period.jpg


Gestation Period
The second submarine, INS Sindhuraj, came to Severodvinsk on September 14, 2017. The negotiations on the second refit of two more Kilo-class submarines of the Indian Navy at the Indian shipyards are now in progress.
INS Sindhukesari rolled out after a second refit at Severodvinsk, Russia – Indian Defence Research Wing
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashwin
Eastern fleet of Indian Navy in Indonesia to strengthen ties
The eastern fleet of the Indian navy - INS Shakti and INS Kamorta - under the command of Rear Admiral Dinesh K Tripathi entered the Port of Makassar, Indonesia, on Saturday.

The three-day visit is to foster professional interaction, sports fixtures and social interactions with the Indonesian navy, a release from the Indian Navy said here.

The ships would be open to visitors.

The visit aims to further strengthen the strong bond and mutual understanding between the two navies, according to the release.

The presence of the frontline warships comes soon after both countries elevated their bilateral ties to a comprehensive strategic partnership during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Indonesia on May29, the release said.

Also, the trip seeks to enhance maritime cooperation between the two navies for security and stability in the region and further bolster strong bonds of friendship India has with Indonesia, it said.

INS Shakti, a fleet tanker, commanded by captain SA Joglekar and indigenously-built stealth Corvette INS Kamorta, commanded by commander Saiket Chatterjee, are on the last leg of their two-month operational deployment to Southeast Asia and western Pacific Ocean, it said.

The deployment included the participation in MALABAR-18, a trilateral exercise between the Indian navy, US navy and the Japanese maritime self-defence force (JMSDF) which was held off Guam, an island territory of the US, in the Pacific Ocean, the release said.

The two ships, along with INS Sahyadri, had left Visakhapatnam for the deployment on April 30 this year and over the last two months visited Singapore, Sattahip (Thailand), Kota Kinabalu (Malaysia) DA Nang (Vietnam) and Guam (USA).

On completion of the MALABAR exercise, INS Sahyadri had proceeded to Hawaii to participate in RIMPAC exercise involving participationof 26 navies, the release added.
Eastern fleet of Indian Navy in Indonesia to strengthen ties - Times of India
 
BHEL to partner Ukraine's Zorya for overhaul of warship turbines
The navy will soon have 34 ships driven by Zorya turbines, with four turbines per vessel, adding up to 136 in-service turbines

With the Indian Navy increasingly choosing the Ukrainian Zorya gas turbine to power its warships, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (BHEL) is setting up a joint venture (JV) in India with the manufacturer, Zorya Mashproekt, to overhaul the turbines in India.

The navy will soon have 34 warships driven by Zorya turbines, with four turbines per vessel, adding up to 136 in-service turbines. There will also be a stock of 6-8 spare turbines.

A turbine is overhauled after running 30,000 hours. This is currently a costly and time-consuming process since it involves sending the turbine back to Ukraine.

“Carrying out the overhaul in India would result in major cost savings, and reduce the downtime for warships, since we would no longer be transporting the turbines to Ukraine for overhaul. It will also reduce our dependence,” said a top navy admiral.

BHEL’s corporate communication chief, Jitender Das, confirmed the company is in talks with Zorya Mashproekt, but declined to reveal any figures or investments since negotiations are still under way.

“We already overhaul Siemens and General Electric gas turbines in our existing facilities at BHEL. So partnering Zorya will expand our portfolio”, said Das.

A propulsion package of four Zorya turbines powers each of the following Indian Navy warships: five Rajput-class destroyers, three Delhi-class destroyers and 16 fast missile corvettes of the 1241RE class. Six Russian-built Talwar-class 1135.6 frigates already field Zorya turbines, as will another four Talwar-class frigates that are currently being purchased.

Basic repair and maintenance of Zorya turbines, though not overhaul, is already being done at the Marine Gas Turbine Overhaul Centre (MGTOC) at INS Eksila, in Visakhapatnam. Now the BHEL-Zorya JV will entirely indigenise maintenance and service support to Zorya turbines.

The navy issimultaneously indigenising production and overhaul for another propulsion unit favoured by Indian warship planners – the General Electric (GE) LM2500 marine gas turbine. Already fitted in the indigenous aircraft carrier, INS Vikrant and in three Shivalik-class frigates, the navy has also chosen the LM2500 for seven more stealth frigates being built under Project 17A.

In December 2016, GE announced that Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) would assemble and test the gas turbines for Project 17A in Bengaluru, under license from GE.

Since warships using the LM2500 turbine are part of both the Eastern Fleet and the Western Fleet, turbine overhaul centres would be set up both in Naval Dockyard, Visakhapatnam; and in Naval Dockyard, Mumbai.

Zorya gas turbines is just one part of the growing India-Ukraine defence cooperation. Since significant parts of the former Soviet Union’s defence industry – such as transport aircraft, Antonov, which built the air force’s AN-32 workhorse transport aircraft – are located in the Ukraine, New Delhi signed a defence cooperation agreement with Kiev in 2005, which mandated that a joint working group from both defence ministries should meet annually. The most recent meeting was held in Kiev in early June.
 
Indian Navy to get Second DSRV before year end
The second of two deep search and rescue vehicle (DSRV) destined for the Indian Navy’s fledgling submarine rescue capability will finish its build process in November 2018, ahead of an expected entry in service in March 2019.

Earlier this year the first submersible undertook open ocean trails near Mumbai off the west coast of India, although the beginning of the monsoon season during this period will necessitate a repeat visit in September to conduct the next phases under improved conditions.

Initial trials and training had taken place in the waters off Fort William and Glasgow, before the submersible’s transfer to India.

The two platforms destine for India are third-generation iteration of JFD’s submarine rescue capability.
According to JFD the third-generation vehicle marks a step change in submarine rescue capability with a focus on speeding up the rescue process through an improved logistics footprint. This improved response time is vital for undersea rescue situations, with stricken submarines generally considered to be able to support crews for around 72 hours at best.

The Indian programme will see a submarine rescue capability operating from its west and east coasts.
Ralph Addison, one of the JFD pilots tasked with working with the Indian Navy personnel, described the ‘good cooperation’ between the two sites during the training process, which began in 2017 and is likely to run through to 2019.

It is thought an option to extend further advice and training expertise exists beyond this time period, should it be required.

Of the capabilities the third-generation variant has over its predecessors Addison said it operates through purely electric thrusters, reducing operational noise levels, which is beneficial for communications during submarine rescue evolutions.

Ben Sharples, India DSRV project director at JFD, told Shephard during a visit to the JFD manufacturing site near Glasgow that with the growth in submarine acquisition by navies – such as that seen in Asia in recent years – these same services were now looking to obtain solutions in the event of an emergency.
‘The Indian Navy [will have] two systems, that is going some. Even the US Navy doesn’t have two rescue systems,’ he said.

Two DSAR-class submarine rescue vehicles had also previously been delivered to the navies of the Republic of Korea and Singapore.

During the site visit, a delegation from an Asian nation potentially seeking a submarine rescue capability was given an extensive briefing by JFD officials.

However, with the market for the new build and purchase of such systems slow – just two ordered and built in the past 10 years – Sharples said that the ‘real value’ for JFD is in the maintenance and ensuring availability of existing platforms.

In November 2017 the Argentinian SSK ARA San Juan was lost with all hand in the South Atlantic, and despite a huge international rescue effort, the submarine and her crew were never found.

In 2000, the Russian SSN Kursk sank in the Barents Sea after an explosion onboard, with Russia rebuffing initial offers of rescue from Western nations.
Indian Navy to get Second DSRV before year end – Indian Defence Research Wing
 
Our ship-build periods are longer than global averages: Vice-Admiral Girish Luthra

girish-luthra1200.jpg

Vice-Admiral Girish Luthra, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Naval Command, at The Indian Express ‘Idea Exchange’. (Express photo by Pradip Das)

There are suggestions that the Navy should move out of Mumbai. What are your thoughts on this?

Navy’s presence pre-dates this city becoming commercial. The naval dockyard is more than 250 years old. Navy today facilitates development, including commercial development. There has been a lot of investment in this area. On both east and west coast of India, the selection of bases has been done after a lot of consideration. Mumbai has a strategic location if we consider the level of threat perception. We have started decongesting the Mumbai base by developing a base at Karwar, near Goa. While phase I is completed and phase II, called Project Sea Bird, under way with a sanction of Rs 19,600 crore, we will be able to berth about 23 ships and 32 yard-craft there. A full-fledged naval dockyard will come up there. This base will ease the load off Mumbai.

There are concerns relating to the fleet itself. How critical is that at this time?

Our submarines are old, ageing and so maintaining, operating them is a challenge. Unfortunately, our own programmes for submarine construction got delayed. In the ongoing Project Scorpene, the first submarine Kalvari got commissioned few months back. The second submarine Khanderi is undergoing trials now and we should be commissioning that shortly. The first submarine was to be delivered in 2012 but it happened five-six years later. The next project for submarines, which is called Project 75 India, has also got to really take shape. In between, we are undertaking medium refit and life certification of the existing submarines. We are certifying them to extend their lives and to continue to operate them.

We have been projecting two very critical requirements, from the point of view of the field. One is the requirement of helicopters and second is the requirement of submarines. We have been commissioning a number of ships for the last many years. In parallel to the ship construction and commissioning of the ships, we have not been able to keep pace with the induction of helicopters. A helicopter on a ship significantly enhances the capability of a warship because it can keep a larger area under surveillance, carry out various attacks and look for submarines. So multirole helicopters are a very critical requirement of the navy. We require around 123 MRH and around 112 naval utility helicopters. Our ship-build periods are much longer than what they ought to be by global averages. So typically, a frigate should be built in two to two and a half years. And we have been averaging 8-9 years.

We saw DRDO tie up with the IITs for research. How can we have a better R&D ecosystem?

In defence it is not important to only focus on manufacturing, it is also important to focus on R&D and to make R&D integral to the industry is even more challenging, because R&D requires that kind of investment and with uncertainty in the demand side, investments in R&D tend to be low in the beginning when you are starting out. So, we need to have an enabling environment. Under the procurement policy there is a Make II Procedure to involve people in R&D to develop prototypes etc. When we look at defence manufacturing, we must also concurrently look at defence R&D because over the years we have had transfer of technology, various models of transfer of technology, we have had various models of joint development. Many models are there, from that now we need to cull out what has worked and what has not worked and see that we give a major boost to defence R&D.

When Vikramaditya goes for a refit it goes out for six months. It’s the only aircraft carrier presently, does this affect your operations?

In the absence of the aircraft carrier we have to work our plans differently. The navy has always said that we need three aircraft carriers – one on either coast and one to allow for refits. Apart from IAC 1, which is under construction, the navy has a proposal for IAC 2, another aircraft carrier to be built in India. But that proposal at present is under discussion.

Given the economic influence, are we pursuing to be a blue water navy?

We are a blue water navy and we have been that for some time but the area that we are operating in and the area that is under our primary and secondary area of interest are at present regional. As I mentioned we are looking at the Indo-Pacific. We are constantly focused on the entire Arabian sea, the Gulf region, we also deploy regularly for anti-piracy missions, we operate on the Mediterranean going from the east coast of Africa going south right up to the equator, this area we are looking at regularly. We also once in a while visit the west coast of Africa and, similarly, on the other side we are visiting western Pacific. Secondary interest areas are where we do not have at present the capacity to keep monitoring or surveillance all the time, we go there once in a while, so that becomes a secondary area of interest.

A report says that China has 57 submarines while India has only 13. Similarly, they have 11 nuclear submarines while we have just one. Is there a deficit?

The numbers are correct, the numbers projected are correct and there has been substantial focus on China on the maritime side. China has focused a lot on naval growth and substantial investments have gone in. We know China’s economy is six times our economy and in terms of ships, aircraft, submarines, their investments are significant and production rate has also been passed. But Indian Navy’s capability in blue water is not in doubt, we are a blue water navy but in terms of size another navy and yet another navy may be bigger in size.

When you deal with a country like China, that has dominance in south china sea and also now in the Indian subcontinent if you compare that to India our relationship with Maldives have severed, treaty with Seychelles happened amidst a lot of uncertainty, What does this say about our foreign policies?

We are working very closely with Ministry of external affairs on our foreign cooperation initiatives and we integrate everything with the foreign policy of the country and we have a number of initiatives navy to navy for defense cooperation and naval cooperation with different countries. It is both from capacity building and capability development of all the navies, the government of India has gifted ships to some other navy and we maintain them, sometimes we support them. We carry out refits of those ships in India. The ships are brought to India. Training provided by Indian navy is very popular. Similarly, other countries also provide some assistance and coordination with them. The countries that you referred to, we have Maldives, Mauritius, Seychelles, navy to navy we have very strong, very good relation and I am sure whenever something comes up on political level, that is examined in Delhi in detail but from the naval point of view, we have some coordination with all these agencies.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: _Anonymous_
They can interact with other IN/IAF assets. But that's not the same as having common Combat-Management System.

Picture two AEGIS-equipped combatants able to function as a coherent group, all eyes, all ears. USN Carrier Strike Group is centered around this cohesion.

Now picture a Oliver H Perry-class frigate with SPS-49 radar thrown into the mix. Can it communicate with other ships in fleet? Yes. But can it cooperatively engage targets? Nope.

Delhi-class (and Talwar frigates) are like that OHP. P-15A, P-15B, and P-17A are like the AEGIS ships.



Just that we have much better options available.



It was still basically Russian design when we removed 2 of 4 AK-630Ms and installed Israeli Barak-1 PDMS in their place.

It's about which system delivers better capability.



What's wrong in wanting that? It's not some castles-in-the-air technology, this is tech we already have on P-15A (and will have on all future Indian-built surface combatants as well).

P-15A is also an amalgamation of Western-Israeli-Russian-Indian tech. If that's not stopping it from having CEC abilities, why should it stop Delhi?

The only real reason why Delhi is not getting MFSTAR+B8 setup is probably cost factor. Doesn't make any sense otherwise.



Why? You already have this networked engagement capability on P-15A.

Does P-15A have common VLS for SSMs and SAMs?



Nothing we can do about those. India holds all designs for Delhi class so we can modify it as we want.

Buying Russian frigates when we had capability to build superior frigates at home is a mistake. And we continue to perpetuate that mistake with these additional 4 Admiral Grigorovich FFGs.

Same goes for carrier. INS Vikramaditya was a mistake - simply not worth the money. Two ships of Vikrant-class would have been so much better. If the price for that was for IN to go some years without any carrier, then so be it. Would've been worth it in the end.

But enough of hindsight. Bottom line is - we can't do anything about Talwars. But we can about Delhi and Shivalik.



Not to be relevant - but to be able to achieve their maximum potential.
You are going into unnecessary details. The point is MFSTAR+B8 is a prohibitively expensive system (~$200 mil?) to put into a 20-year-old ship . Upgrading it to the current standard is good enough. No Navy in the world keeps every ship on the cutting edge because its unnecessary. Older AEGIS ships are not getting BMD upgrade because the hull is old and USN don't think it needs the capability. Here IN is ok with only P-15A/B ships having the capability you mentioned.

What's wrong in wanting that?
Nothing. When we couldn't do basic interoperability(VLS) then you cant expect this much.
 
Because it's already underway?

delhiclass-png.2815

Of course. We have to wait for it to finish, and then we will get information from the finished system. The navy won't give us all the info proactively. For example, there is a new family of radars built for the navy using GaN from Saab, Thales etc. So we don't really know until we see it.

@Parthu
We plan to equip 24 ships with the MFSTAR+B8 combo. That's plenty. Beyond that we need to start working on our own stuff.

I don't think Delhi class can handle the MFSTAR anyway. The superstructure and mast are completely different.
INS_Kolkata_and_INS_Delhi_alongside_at_Porbandar.jpg


I believe Shivalik will also face the same problem.
 
India Successfully Develops Next-Gen Software-Defined Naval Radios

The Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO) has claimed that the state-of-the-art ship borne software-defined radios are similar to those made by Rhode and Schwarz of Germany, Thales of France and Harris of the US.

New Delhi (Sputnik): India's Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has developed a next-gen military radio communication system for the country's naval forces. The system is expected to assist in the networking of naval battlefield resources on the move and enhance the operational capabilities of the Indian Navy.

The DRDO, after spending eight years on the Integrated Development of Software-Defined Radio for Navy (INDESDR) project, has successfully completed user trials for five different software-defined radios capable of addressing the needs of the Indian Navy, including surface ships, specific air platforms (Dornier) and marines.

"These SDRs would replace existing single-purpose hardware-based communication systems used by the Navy through multi-band, multi-function, multi-role/mission radios, having capabilities for software-based reconfigurability. These SDRs are able to inter-operate with all legacy naval tactical radios and have integrated mission specific waveforms. The most complex and critical waveform is Mobile ad hoc Networking (MANET), which has built-in Electronic Counter-Countermeasures capability," a DRDO document reads.

Last November, India's Defence Acquisition Council had approved the procurement of more than 260 SDRs for the Navy at a cost of more than $75 million. State-owned Bharat Electronics Ltd will produce this equipment at the mass level for the armed forces. After induction, the Indian Navy would be able to carry out net-centric operations confidently using these indigenous state-of-the-art radios.

DRDO is now mulling the development of next-generation radio technology for fighter aircraft, land systems and for special operations for internal security purposes.
 
Of course. We have to wait for it to finish, and then we will get information from the finished system. The navy won't give us all the info proactively.
Good to see you waiting for more info for a change rather than jumping into future 20 years down the line.:p

But for this MLU order is placed and media reported specific updates. Check old posts.
 
Arleigh Burkes don't have this problem. There will be cooperative engagement capability between ships equipped with the MFSTAR+B8 combo (any ship in networked fleet can see any target that any other ship sees and can engage any target that any other ship sees).

CEC isn't an inbuilt capability within AEGIS or MFSTAR though. It's an add-on that requires a specific subset of control systems and software. Norway and Japan both use the American SPY-1 radar, M82 illuminators, ESSM or SM-2, and AEGIS combat system. But neither are capable of CEC across their entire fleet because their control systems lack the necessary code and protocols for it.

Of Japan's warships, only their most recent 27DDG class ships (Maya class), and not the Atago or Kongo they're based on can do CEC because they have the requisite sensor network for it and their predecessors, also equipped with AEGIS including AEGIS BMD (not included in every AEGIS suite or ship either) don't.

image


Norway's Nansen class frigates also can't, neither can Spain's Álvaro de Bazán class or South Korea's Sejong the Great-class. Despite having the AEGIS combat system (mostly its air-warfare module) and its component parts like SPY-1, these countries and their ships lack the CEC sensor network, coding and protocols necessary for its use.

20180508tk_I8833.t5af13814.m800.x8c2QwHun.jpg


20160610JLH_IMG_8649.t57a06a20.m800.xqQ2mTDNG.jpg


maxresdefault.jpg


I have to disagree and say it's not a given that the MFSTAR+B8 combo would have this capability. It requires a host of specialized sensors and coding that don't come in the baseline variants.
 
I have to disagree and say it's not a given that the MFSTAR+B8 combo would have this capability. It requires a host of specialized sensors and coding that don't come in the baseline variants.

The Kolkata-class does, to put it in the words of the Navy's Controller of Warship Production & Acquisition (CWP&A), one Vice Adm. DM Deshpande. Sitting in the CIC of one Kolk, you can apparently launch a missile from any other Kolk in the vicinity.

I guess it would be reasonable to assume the P-15B will have it as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amal