Oh yeah its the manik engine apparently, I think I posted before? the fuel contrl system and other LRUs were also posted separately
Separately work on rustom2 uav 180hp engine on work, below is the engine cowling (please delete if sensitive)
Oh yeah its the manik engine apparently, I think I posted before? the fuel contrl system and other LRUs were also posted separately
AERDC & GTRE working seperately on engine programs is another major factor on why we lag.HAL’s Aero Engine Research and Development Centre (AERDC) in Bengaluru was inaugurated today.
HTFE-25 engine on a test bench:
View attachment 31483
PTAE-7 turbojet engine:
View attachment 31485
you mean if two bricks which sink separately when joined together will be able to float. Thats either quantum physics or blind belief, not able to make out which one it is.AERDC & GTRE working seperately on engine programs is another major factor on why we lag.
Kaveri was developed by GTRE while all the ToT (be it of any level) for AL31FP, RD33 se-3, Adour lies with HAL.you mean if two bricks which sink separately when joined together will be able to float. Thats either quantum physics or blind belief, not able to make out which one it is.
One of the reason engine program has not achieved expected success due to our expertise in metallurgy, simply put technical ability. If solution was in organizational restructuring then this would have taken place long time back. As you have rightly mentioned this restructuring will result in cost & operational efficiency but from perspective of technical output dont expect any thing to change.Kaveri was developed by GTRE while all the ToT (be it of any level) for AL31FP, RD33 se-3, Adour lies with HAL.
Why not make use of all the resources together.
Similarly GTRE has required experience of testing a new system, their facilities & manpower will be crucial to HALs engine efforts.
Maybe.One of the reason engine program has not achieved expected success due to our expertise in metallurgy, simply put technical ability. If solution was in organizational restructuring then this would have taken place long time back. As you have rightly mentioned this restructuring will result in cost & operational efficiency but from perspective of technical output dont expect any thing to change.
Maybe.
But dividing already scarce recourses into two will not help. Why spend fixed costs twice ? Why do the process twice?
One barrier to Chinese domestic engine manufacturing is the availability of machine tooling that is suitable for aerospace applications. While the engines can be made of components completely produced in China, they are manufactured on Western machines. The most complex machine tools, five-axis and seven-axis systems, require immense engineering talent to manufacture and operate, and Chinese aerospace firms still have to import these systems from abroad[50]—including from German, Japanese, Italian, and likely Korean firms.
Another barrier to large-scale Chinese jet engine manufacturing is lack of knowledge of how to optimize the manufacturing process, despite attempts to exfiltrate this information. In 2018, Chinese-American citizen Xiaoqing Zheng was convicted by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for his involvement in stealing trade secrets regarding turbine sealing, a dual-use technology that is commonly employed in the development of aero engines.[55] In another case, Chinese intelligence officer Xu Yanjun targeted experts employed by Western aerospace companies to both provide sensitive manufacturing data and speak to Chinese engineers in an effort to improve the country’s manufacturing processes.[56] However, China has not yet been able to use the stolen information successfully to indigenize its aircraft engine industry.
Historically, Chinese engines have been lagging their Western counterparts by roughly 30 years.[58] In recent years, China’s efforts to develop maritime turbines, which rely on less complex but similar technology, seem to have taken closer to 15 years.