Obviously can't. It's not single engine.
What do.the Russians use as the First Supersonic Trainer aircraft for their new fighter pilots
Obviously can't. It's not single engine.
What do.the Russians use as the First Supersonic Trainer aircraft for their new fighter pilots
What we need to understand is that with the Mig21 going out we have 2 problems, which need 2 solutions.A contract that should have been signed at the end of 2019 got delayed by a year because HAL got a bit too greedy. It's also likely they increased the prices so the govt calls for negotiations and this way HAL buys more time for the development of Mk1A.
So yeah, with 2 jets to be delivered by March 2024, and the remaining every year after that at a minimum of 16/year, we are going to see a delivery cycle of 6 years. Basically, the year we will decommission the last Mig-21, we will commission the first full Mk1A squadron. So we will have to manage our western border with only about 50-60 jets, not a good position to be in. It will take at least 2 more years for us to be in a comfortable position.
I hope the Kiran hangar is properly leveraged to reduce the delivery time.
What we need to understand is that with the Mig21 going out we have 2 problems, which need 2 solutions.
They are first, the fall in numbers and secondly their capabilities. Ideally Mk1/Mk1A should have filled for both. But as you yourself said, let's leave what has already happened. We are looking to replace the Mig21 capabilities between 2024 to 2028. That's solving the capability , but the number problem still persists. Additional Rafale and that second hand Mig21 squadron if signed could have filled in the numbers. But then again everything depends on CAPEX. I do not have any possible solution for that as of now.
We have as of today not signed any contract either for 21 Mig29 or 12 Su30MKI.We have recently purchased 21 MiG 29s
Mig29 is supposed to be a stop gap. We will need them to replace starting 2035. Doesn't make sense to invest a lot. Better to utilise remaining funding for force multipliers.Why cannot we increase this order to 50 planes
What we need to understand is that with the Mig21 going out we have 2 problems, which need 2 solutions.
They are first, the fall in numbers and secondly their capabilities. Ideally Mk1/Mk1A should have filled for both. But as you yourself said, let's leave what has already happened. We are looking to replace the Mig21 capabilities between 2024 to 2028. That's solving the capability , but the number problem still persists. Additional Rafale and that second hand Mig21 squadron if signed could have filled in the numbers. But then again everything depends on CAPEX. I do not have any possible solution for that as of now.
We are banking a lot. Almost everything on desi developments. Meanwhile the trainer of Tejas has yet not been certified. And that is to be Mk1 standards only. Not Mk1A. I really don't think we have the resources to complete multiple development projects simultaneously.Since a few years, I've been saying that we need a minimum of 350 jets signed by the end of the decade to arrest the fall in squadron numbers. Beyond this decade, the sheer size of our economy will take care of the rest.
So, with 83 LCAs, 36 Rafales, 21 Mig-29s and 12 MKIs, we are already at 152 new jets this decade. Follow those up with 118 LCA Mk2 and 114 MRFA, we get 384 jets. Add 40 AMCA Mk1, we get 424 jets. So we are already well set, as long as MRFA takes off. Even without MRFA, it's still a decent 310 jets which are practically assured.
Capex is a major issue only for the next few years, because we are buying so many things at once right now. A huge amount of money has gone into building new command and control facilities as well, including for BMD. Beyond 2027, pretty much all IAF projects are only on paper. None of that money has even been allocated yet. Even with a very modest average of $10B a year as capex between 2027 and 2037, up from $6B today, we get $100B. 114 Rafale will not cost any more than $20B in procurement costs. 118 LCA Mk2 will likely cost less than $12B. It's only 30% of a modest capex budget. There's enough money to double orders for both and still have 40% of the capex money left over for the decade. I don't see capex becoming a problem after 2027 when it comes to arresting squadron drawdown. Time will become more important by then.
We are banking a lot. Almost everything on desi developments. Meanwhile the trainer of Tejas has yet not been certified. And that is to be Mk1 standards only. Not Mk1A. I really don't think we have the resources to complete multiple development projects simultaneously.
What we have poured into AMCA development till date, South Korea has been investing 5 times that amount every year for the past 10 years. I really don't have much confidence on ADA/HAL.
Therefore batch buys of Rafale, Made in Irkut Su30MKI (only non Russian equipment fitted in India) is the way forward. Atleast till we see Mk2 and AMCA test beds flying.
Boparai was the officer who coordinated my presentation to IN for MSA.
Boparai was the officer who coordinated my presentation to IN for MSA.
Its Mirage 2000Trainer aircraft crash near bhind. IAF origin. Pilot injured.
Boparai was the officer who coordinated my presentation to IN for MSA.
Its Mirage 2000
Boparai was the officer who coordinated my presentation to IN for MSA.
HAL or French, who is responsible?Upgraded? Some weird thing going on with the M2000. Said to be a technical malfunction.
I think we must start talks with TAIWAN and GREECE for buying their Second hand Mirages in Future