You asked me to check the tender document and I did.
What did I selectively quote? Did it mention DRDO elsewhere?
If i remember correctly, i was the one saying it's global RFI for "Import".
This is what you said:
Completely wrong. FRCV is under the strategic partnership (SP) model. Which is 100% imported design and license production with a local partner.
This is what's in the RFI document in rebuttal to that:
The Indian ‘Strategic Partner’ will retain the ownership of the design and technologies for the platform to ensure realisation of ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’.
Ain't no such thing as 100% import in the FRCV when the Indian partner is expected to hold the IP for it. No one, not even the Russians, will simply hand over the IP of their designs meant for their captive clients.
Plus DRDO will be a technology partner in the program, even if their design is not chosen. So technologies being developed under NGMBT can find their way into the FRCV, since DRDO is expected to provide ToT of their products to any Indian company, which includes the SPs.
SPM has been designed to be very flexible. It's very different from the Buy and Make Global component of the DPP, which is mainly about 100% import and license production, with no transfer of IP, the one you are actually talking about. So, no, it's not what you think it is.
FRCV will be our very first "import" project which will have a design phase, R&D phase and production phase. This is basically no different from AMCA, the only difference being 11 other foreign companies will also be competing, not just DRDO being nominated without a competition.
Even in FICV, DRDO is competing with private Indian companies. They are partnering with OFB. What, you think DRDO should be handed over the FICV too, no competition? FRCV is no different from FICV in its objective.
FRCV allows foreign OEMs to bring in exotic technologies that they cannot develop on their own due to the small orders placed by their own captive forces or other issues like requirements. For example, instead of Armata, the Russians can compete with the more advanced T-95, or an even better design that's a generation after the T-14/T-95. I'm sure South Korea will be able to design a more advanced tank if the number of tanks and other platforms to be produced is 4000+ instead of just 200+.
Once foreign OEMs step in with their designs and technologies, this will allow the IA to create a new set of RFPs that combine the best of all the OEMs in relation to what's required by the IA. And then, these OEMs can partner with Indian companies to compete with each other through SPM. The process will end up being no different from FICV. DRDO can offer their own product with OFB or any other Indian partner. They won't simply be handed the project on a platter like the IAF did with AMCA.
So please tell me how this is 100% import and license production?
Don't have to. HTT-40 won over any further import of PC-7. Which was the point.
And in exchange, the IAF has no pilots to fly their jets. Nice point. Now, the IAF will lease PC-7s instead. Points are flying all over the place, not pilots.
Think about it, if India and China go to war within the next 2 years, the IA will have ZERO 52 cal towed guns. ZERO!!!
Do you want to win wars or just make DPSUs fatter and fatter? Your priorities are all mixed up.