Product of misguided education system of socialist era. Looking down upon people who create wealth from an 'imagined' moral high ground.
Creating wealth is not a zero sum game. Everyone can be wealthy!.
Obviously, there isn’t a finite number of jobs, or finite amount of wealth. Otherwise we would still be sitting around in caves, figuring out how to divide up pieces of fire wood, and the occasional dead deer.
Most of the wealth in civilization, in fact all of it, has been created. It got created from somewhere. It got created from people. It got created from technology. It got created from productivity. It got created from hard work. This idea that it’s stolen is this horrible zero-sum game that people who are trying to gain status play.
But the reality is everyone can be rich. We can see that by seeing, that in the First World, everyone is basically richer than almost anyone who was alive 200 years ago. 200 years ago nobody had antibiotics. Nobody had cars. Nobody had electricity. Nobody had the iPhone. All of these things are inventions that have made us wealthier as a species.
Today, I would rather be a poor person in a First World country, than be a rich person in Louis the XIV’s France. I’d rather be a poor person today than aristocrat back then. That’s because of wealth creation.The engine of technology is science that is applied for the purpose of creating abundance.
Capitalism is actually good. It’s just that it gets hijacked. It gets hijacked by improper pricing of externalities. It gets hijacked by improper yields, where you have corruption, or you have monopolies.
Rich getting rich is a good thing as long as its a free market. Its their only incentive to continue taking risks. Mukesh Ambani took a huge bet of $35 billion and played a long game of 4-5 years to create Jio. It could have ruined his empire. It destroyed inefficient competitions and reduced the cost of moble internet to the poor. He also generated lots of wealth whomever worked with/for him. Anil Ambani took different bets and lost now going through bankruptcy process.
Role of state is to be a mediators ie, create free market. In india the legacy of socialism is so entrenched in to our minds we cant let go. It failed everywhere yet (educated) people makes this kind of statement. Redistribution of wealth is a terrible idea it failed everywhere. Celebrate wealth creators, facilitate them. If there is corruption and crony capitalism then fix the system strengthen institutions. If you demonise the rich and tax even more they can leave and look for other places to create their wealth. Which is never good.
PS: part credits naval ravikant
Its good that PM has started talking about the same openly.
PM Narendra Modi bats for ‘wealth creators’
Opinion | Modi seems to have reprised Gandhi’s economic vision
relevant what i saw morning today:
Yes Capitalism gets hijacked by the very same set of conditions and players who are its strongest proponents. This is precisely what all socialist thinkers have been warning against. Free market conditions established on the principles fair play and level playing field for the key components of a capital generating system namely the capitalist, the working class , the consumers, all regulated by an impartial state, is an illusion at best. As history testifies the state is never an impartial player. In a political system rigged to favor the capitalist, tax laws, labor laws, land acquisition laws are rigged to favor the capitalist . As witnessed during the Reagan and Thatcher years, labor unions were suppressed ,genuine labor reforms were stymied and valid labour demands were summarily dismissed as regressive and obstructionist.
On the other hand a conservative socialist political system riggs the system to favor the working class, where the genuine requirements of the capitalists to control profit and protect capital is sacrificed at the altar of working class interests. With the collapse of the socialist political system around the world, the world is increasingly veering towards anti labourism. Working class is increasingly viewed as an enabling force for capitalists and hence govts world over, including the so called socialist states, are coming out with steps that seeks make labor cheap and affordable for the business class. There is only one way to make labor cheap and affordable, roll back all pro labor legislation and rules which when it was in enforce guaranteed workers minimum wages, fixed working hours, provided for effective insurance against death, poor health and accidents, guaranteed against summary layoffs.
Now the mantra is make labor competitive, whether this means to disenfranchise the worker of his genuine rights is moot.
P:S - Yes its better to be poor worker in contemporary times than any other time in our past, all thanks to the sacrifices of socialists revolutionaries who envisioned a world where the status of worker was not synonymous with slavery, where being being a laborer was not an an automatic death sentence due to poor work condition, no statutory rest day, no health insurance. Trust me its better to be poor worker in 2019 than it was to be a poor worker in the 18th century.