That's great I think we have mastered both cryo and semi cryo engine technology now the only limitation remain is funding.
It's not that straight forward. When we talk about rocket engines in India, the conversation is mostly about engines classified by the state of the propellant. But that's not the whole story. Here is where the Indian aerospace industry stands in engine development:
Classification of Rocket Engines by propellent state
1.
Solid: Where both the fuel & oxidizer is in solid state at room temperature & pressure. Eg. S200 boosters, PSLV solid stages, Skyroot's Kalam-5 etc.
2.
Liquid: Where both the fuel & oxidizer is in liquid state at room temperature & pressure. Eg. Vikas engine, L40 boosters, Skyroot's Raman-1 etc.
3.
Cryogenic: Where both the fuel & oxidizer is in gaseous state at room temperature & pressure. They need to be cooled & pressurized to be liquified. Eg. CE-7.5, CE-20 & Skyroot's Dhawan-1.
4.
Semi-Cryogenic: Where the fuel is in liquid state at room temperature & pressure. But the oxidizer is a gas & need to be liquified cryogenically. Eg. SCE-200 & Agnikul's Agnilet engine .
Classification of Rocket Engines by propellent type
1.
HTPB based: Hydroxyl-terminated Poly-Butadiene (HTPB) binder is the most commonly used solid fuel binder. All ISRO's solid fueled rockets rely on this binder. India has large production capacity of HTPB & enough technical capacity to build solid rockets of any size as needed. Eg. All ISRO solid rockets, most of DRDO's rockets, Skyroot's Kalam-5.
2.
UDMH-MMH/N2O4-MON: Unsymmetrical di-methyl hydrazine (UDMH) & Mono-methyl hydrazine (MMH) are 2 members of the hydrazine family that ISRO uses. Although ISRO is capable of producing very powerful engines using the hydrazine family of fuels they have chosen not to do so, as Hydrazine based fuels are highly toxic. Eg. Vikas Engine, L40 boosters, L110 stage, PSLV 4th stage, LAM etc.
3.
LH2/LOX: These type of engines are also called Hydrolox engines. Liquid Hydrogen is very powerful fuel, but it is a pain to handle. ISRO has overcome the logistical problems We currently have one of the most powerful upper stage cryogenic engines in the world, the CE-20. ISRO had plans of developing a more powerful version of the CE-20, called CE-60, which would produce 600 kN of thrust. No further news have been heard about the CE-60.
4.
KEROLOX: Engines powered by Kerosene & liquid oxygen. SCE-200 is the only KEROLOX engine ISRO has so far. Agnikul's Agnilet, which was tested in February 2021, is also a Kerolox engine. The Agnilet is meant for upper stages. ISRO's Mahendragiri test centre looks almost ready. The SCE-200 should see a test firing in a year, be that in India or Ukraine.
5.
CH4/LOX: Also known as Methalox engines. Methane is one of the Green propellants ISRO is very interested in. India is a sizable producer of Methane/LNG, thus it is cheaper and available locally. Also handling & storing Methane is cheaper & safer. ISRO has at least 2 Methalox engines in development. These engine are being developed for powering upper stage in place of the Hydrolox engines. Skyroot's Dhawan-1 is a 3D printed LNG/LOX engine that was tested in September 2020. LNG is 95-98% Methane, so the Dhawan-1 can be effectively considered a Methalox engine.
Classification of Rocket Engines by engine cycle
1.
Solid rockets: Solid rockets mostly have no cycle of operation, unless they are built for specialized applications. Most of the complex solid rocket cycles like dual pulse propulsion, multi-tube pulse propulsion, SFDRs etc. already exists with DRDO. The tech can be transferred if needed.
2.
Expander/Bleeder: ISRO is studying the feasibility of developing a expander cycle based Methalox engine. Now this is a guess but I think Skyroot's Dhawan-1 LNG/LOX cryogenic engine probably runs on an expander cycle. It could also be an pump fed engine. We have to wait to get the word from them.
3.
Gas Generator: ISRO has 2 powerful GG cycle engines, CE-20 & Vikas. They are studying the feasibility of developing a GG cycle based Methalox engine. GG cycle engines aren't scaled up as they have lower Isp compared to Staged Combustion cycle. Agnikul's Agnilet engine might be a GG cycle engine.
4.
Staged Combustion: ISRO's CE-7.5 is the only Staged Combustion cycle engine we have. ISRO is studying the feasibility of developing a SC cycle based Methalox engine. Though I really hoped for it but ISRO has shown no interest in scaling up the CE-7.5 despite the Isp advantages. ISRO is looking to develop ~100 kN Methalox engines. If they go for a SC cycle that would be a definite scale up in thrust.
5.
Oxygen Rich Staged Combustion: SC cycles are normally Fuel rich. Oxygen rich cycles are difficult to develop as they tend to corrode/erode engine components at a very rapid pace. But the improvements in Isp brought by an Oxygen rich cycle is hard to ignore. This is one of the primary road bocks to the SCE-200's development. ISRO had to develop multiple new alloys, manufacturing processes to deal with these problems. Will that be enough ? We will know soon, I guess.
6.
Full Flow Staged Combustion: Full Flow SC engines are the holy grail of high performance rocket engines. They are so complex that only a couple of FFSC engines have ever been built. The demands of the engines is so great that FFSC engines are only feasible for a few types of fuels. We have no such engines, nor does ISRO plan to develop a FFSC cycle engine. ISRO might look at FFSC engines after the SC-200 completes development.
7.
Nuclear propulsion: Dr. S. Somanath over the years in a number of his presentation slides have shown ISRO's intent in developing nuclear rockets. According to a recent presentation ISRO plans to have nuclear propulsion ready by 2050.
8.
Air-breathing engines: Includes turbofans, turbojets, ramjets, turbo-ramjets, scramjets etc. The progress of these engines are pretty well known so I won't go into it.
Technically the following are not rockets. But still since we are talking of engine development:
1.
Ion thruster: In house development by ISRO & a separate joint development with Bellatrix. ISRO also purchased a few Russian Ion thrusters & used them on GSAT-4 & GSAT-9. Indian Ion thrusters should be ready by next year.
2.
Hall Effect thruster: Joint development with Bellatrix. The 1st Indian Hall Effect thruster is equipped on the GSAT-20. the Hall Effect Thruster is Xenon based, but other noble gases can also be used.
3.
Plasma thruster: India has no plasma based thrusters yet. ISRO put out a tender in 2017 seeking help of Indian companies in developing Plasma thrusters. There have been no further updates on it.
The point of this long write up is to say that there are more technological challenges ahead of us. The SCE-200 is a significant milestone but it certainly wont be the last of our problems. If we want to have re-usable launchers we need to develop competence in engine clustering too. ISRO has managed to cluster two 800 kN engines, while there are rockets with 7 much more powerful engines clustered together.
Also ISRO needs to do better at production line management & privatization. They can't seem to reach their launcher production targets & almost all launches get delayed somehow. DRDO, for all the brickbats they get, have done a better job at production line management & privatization. The companies that are lining up to manufacture DRDO developed missiles are lukewarm at the prospects of PSLV production privatization. DRDO & ISRO have almost the same budget, money alone can't solve problems of efficiency.
I hope that isn't commercial property.
Nope more a generic design to manufacture a full sized reference engine. Notice on the bottom right of the photos it says mock up. They wanted to start designing rocket stages with the engine. Stage design is easier if you have a close idea of the engine dimensions, weight, center of gravity etc.