Islamic Republic of Afghanistan : News & Discussions

U.S. and Taliban negotiators to meet again following Trump approval
By Karen DeYoung and Susannah George | Feb. 12, 2020 at 10:35 a.m. EST

1581525357436.png

Members of the Taliban delegation arrive for talks in Moscow in May. On Tuesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo claimed “notable progress” in peace talks with the Taliban. (Alexander Zemlianichenko/AP)
American and Taliban negotiators are meeting in Doha Wednesday following a conditional decision from President Trump to sign a peace deal with the militants, according to officials.

One U.S. official and an Afghan official briefed on the matter said Trump gave his conditional approval to sign a peace agreement if the insurgents can demonstrate their commitment to reducing violence in Afghanistan.

“Trump has endorsed the deal and said it must be signed,” the Afghan official said, explaining that when Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called Afghan leaders Tuesday, he said the peace talks “deadlock” had been broken.

Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to speak to the media.

For months, U.S. negotiators have demanded a reduction in violence from the Taliban before formal talks could resume. Taliban negotiators presented a violence reduction proposal in January that would have ceased attacks in cities and highways. But it was unclear how long it would last and if it would apply to the Afghan military as well as U.S. military personnel.

After weeks of back and forth, U.S. and Taliban negotiators have reached an agreement on how exactly violence will be reduced and for how long, according to the Afghan official. People knowledgeable about the negotiations said the reduction would probably be seven to 10 days.

The State Department, in a statement late Tuesday, said “U.S. talks with the Taliban in Doha continue around the specifics of a reduction in violence.”

Pompeo told Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and Chief Executive Abdullah in separate phone calls Tuesday that “notable progress” had been made in the peace talks, the Afghan leaders later said on Twitter.

Afghan officials have previously said a nationwide ceasefire is a precondition to talks with the Taliban, but both Ghani and Abdullah expressed optimism about a potential “reduction in violence.” Abdulllah said the “progress in current talks could lead to an agreement that would pave the way for intra-Afghan talks leading to a durable peace.”

The temporary reduction in violence, which an Afghan official said is tentatively to be announced by Pompeo and Ghani after a meeting this weekend in Munich, is intended as an expression of good faith on the part of the Taliban. Assuming the designated period is successfully completed, a more formal U.S.-Taliban agreement is to be signed within days. The agreement would include the start of direct talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government next month, and the beginning of a U.S. troop withdrawal.

One person knowledgeable about the negotiations cautioned that it remains unclear what the status of any signed U.S.-Taliban agreement would be if violence resumed after the agreed reduction period, or if promised talks between the militants and the Afghan government did not succeed or even begin. This person spoke on the condition of anonymity about the closed-door negotiations.

In September, U.S. negotiator Zalmay Khalilzad announced that a tentative deal had been reached with the Taliban. Trump then said he planned to bring Taliban leaders to Camp David to sign it, but he called off the meeting — which the Taliban later said it had not agreed to — as well as further talks, after the militants took credit for an attack in Kabul that killed an American soldier.

The draft agreed to at the time included Taliban cooperation in fighting against terrorist groups in Afghanistan, such as the Islamic State, as well as U.S. withdrawal and inter-Afghan talks, with a nationwide cease-fire at the top of the agenda. Trump announced in November that the talks had restarted, but progress was reported to be limited until recently.

Khalilzad met with Ghani in Kabul on Saturday to brief him on recent discussions with the militants and meetings with Pakistani officials, Ghani’s office said.

“We are waiting for a clear answer from the Taliban for a cease-fire or lasting reduction in violence based on a working mechanism which is acceptable to the people of Afghanistan and the U.S. government,” his office said.

In last week’s State of the Union address, Trump said that “the determination and valor of our warfighters has allowed us to make tremendous progress,” although U.S. government reports have indicated that the number of Taliban attacks during the last quarter of 2019 were the highest in nearly a decade.

But Trump, who has promised to stop the country’s “endless wars,” said that “peace talks are now underway” and “we are working to finally end America’s longest war and bring our troops back home.”

Tentative terms for a new U.S.-Taliban agreement are said to be nearly identical to the one in September. It was unclear, however, whether any initial withdrawal would reduce the U.S. force from about 12,000 to the 8,600 already planned without any deal or even lower.

The composition of an Afghan government negotiating team — one of the sticking points of the earlier agreement — also remains uncertain. Afghan officials announced in December that Ghani had won reelection with just over 50 percent in a nationwide September vote, avoiding a second round of voting.

But Abdullah, his estranged governing partner and main opponent, challenged the results.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Source: The Washington Post

George reported from Islamabad. Sayed Salahuddin and Sharif Hassan in Kabul contributed to this report.
 
Russia accepts no Taliban’s monopoly of power in Afghanistan — envoy
Russia has reiterated to the Taliban it will never accept any monopoly of power in Afghanistan, Russian President’s Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Director of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Second Asian Department, Zamir Kabulov, said on Tuesday.

"We have told the Taliban straight more than once that we accept no monopoly and [are opposed to] the Taliban’s return to power," he stated. "We are not the only ones to say it. Afghanistan’s neighbors — Pakistan and Iran — and also the United States and China share this position."

"Our position is that Afghanistan is to continue as a republic. But it is up to the Afghan people to decide on that and to reach some consensus," he stressed.

‘Afghan four’ meeting
Special envoys of Russia, the US, China and Pakistan for Afghanistan have agreed to meet on the sidelines of the intra-Afghan talks, according to Zamir Kabulov.

"We agreed during the last 3 plus 1 meeting [the US, Russia, China plus Pakistan] in Beijing, that our next meeting would take place back-to-back and on the sidelines of the intra-Afghan talks," he commented.

"We believe that the very fact of cooperation of all the four powerful states — we would also like to be joined by Iran, which has a lot of influence in the region — will have a positive effect on both sides of the talks, so that we could encourage and motivate them for peace," Kabulov revealed.

The last meeting between Russia, the US, China and Pakistan on Afghanistan took place in July 2019.
According to a peace treaty signed between the US and the Taliban movement, the intra-Afghan talks on permanent and comprehensive ceasefire must begin on March 10.

The United States and the Taliban movement (outlawed in Russia) inked a peace deal on February 29 in Qatar’s capital city, Doha. Under the terms of the deal, Washington and its allies commit to withdrawing their forces from Afghanistan in the next 14 months. The US contingent in that country is to shrink to 8,600 troops in a span of four and a half months after the signing. The US allies are to withdraw their forces proportionally. Apart from that, the United States and its allies are to withdraw troops from five military bases. The rest of the troops are to be withdrawn from Afghanistan in subsequent nine and a half months provided that the Taliban meets its commitments.

The Taliban, in turn, undertakes not to use Afghanistan’s territory to stage actions jeopardizing the United States’ and its allies’ security. Talks between the Taliban and other Afghan parties are to start on March 10. Before that, as a trust-building measure, up to 5,000 Taliban supporters are to be released and the Taliban is to free up to 1,000 people it keeps prisoner.
https://tass.com/politics/1126159
 
Medical tourism — the game changer in India’s ties with Taliban
While hardboiled watchers of the Afghanistan scene are not overly impressed by the invitation to India as an ‘observer’ for the Qatar talks held recently between the US and Taliban to hammer out a deal for the American pullout, a tiny thaw in the Islamist organisation’s attitude towards New Delhi is discernible.

A lot of this `softening’ is grounded in realpolitic. Unlike 1996-2001, when Taliban under Pakistani influence was openly hostile to India’s presence in Afghanistan, a subtle shift has taken place with improved Indo-Afghanistan relations in the last decade or so. Some Taliban leaders have in the recent past suggested, even if somewhat mutedly, that India too has stakes in Afghanistan.

India’s investment in Afghanistan has made New Delhi a player of some standing in the land-locked, war-ravaged country. “The view in Afghanistan is that it is better to have India inside the tent than outside it. For New Delhi too, it is a realisation that Taliban is the permanent entity in that country, so you have to deal with it, rather than ignore it,” says Sushant Sareen of the ORF, a noted expert.

India’s acclaimed soft power
However, in this battle of geopolitical posturing, it is India’s acclaimed soft power that seems to have influenced attitudes across the Durand Line. India’s medical tourism has played a big part in changing Afghan attitudes, even if to a limited degree. Afghan medical tourism patients and their travelling family and friends — currently estimated at 300,000 by the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry – contribute some $3 billion to the Indian economy. The Max Hospitals in Delhi, for instance, count for roughly anywhere around 8,000-10,000 Afghan patients every year. A number of those who come for healthcare may have Taliban connections, either directly or indirectly and get to see another side of the picture.

Hospitals in Delhi witness a tremendous rush of Afghan patients, contributing greatly to medical tourism in India and even more important, improving people-to-people contacts between the two countries.

As part of a concerted diplomatic policy, Indian medical visas are free and do not require applicants to provide financial statements or proof of medical insurance. Years of war and crisis have damaged the healthcare infrastructure in Afghanistan, leaving many to search elsewhere for well-equipped and well-staffed facilities that maintain international standards. Here India offers the best facilities at prices that are far less than what would cost in the US and elsewhere in the developed world.

India has invested nearly $3 billion in aid to rebuild Afghanistan — seeking to win economic influence, boost security and gain a link to Central Asia — building over 200 public and private schools, sponsoring about 1,000 scholarships and playing host to upwards of 16,000 Afghan students.

The deficiencies of Afghan healthcare services have not been lost on Indian hospitals, which have been eager to lay out the welcome mat and tap into this new revenue stream. Many hospitals in Delhi already have websites in Dari and Pashto, and separate payment and service desks for Afghans. Prayer rooms, halal food and Afghan cuisine are also available and almost all hospitals provide interpreters free of charge.

Most patients from Afghanistan rent apartments in small localities of south Delhi like Lajpat Nagar, Malviya Nagar and Bhogal, which are close to premier hospitals like Apollo, Max, AIIMS and Moolchand Hospital.

Diplomatic outreach
Mohammad Gulnawaz, who underwent critical surgery for brain tumour at Max Hospital, rented an apartment for a month in Malviya Nagar. “It was at walking distance from the hospital and not very expensive,” said Gulnawaz, adding, “there are also some nice Afghan food outlets in the locality.”

Others like Mujeeb ur Rehman, 55, damaged his left leg in a mine blast while coming to Kabul from Kunar. Doctors in Kabul advised him to go to India or Pakistan for surgery. “I decided to go to India though it was a little more expensive than Pakistan,” says Rehman.

As part of the diplomatic outreach, India offers many facilities to Afghan patients with hassle-free visas in addition to addressing their security concerns, unlike Pakistan and Iran. According to the Indian Embassy in Kabul, more than 100,000 medical visas have been issued in the last three years.

Many Afghan medical tourists are as fascinated by traditional and natural medicine as by modern medicine. Ayurveda, unani medicine and yoga are also popular.

Not surprisingly, even Pakistan has confirmed that it has lost Afghan medical tourism trade to India in the last few years, mainly due to its border management policy. In October 2019, the Pakistan ministry of commerce suggested that in order to get business back, they will have to organise, coordinate, facilitate and develop health tourism in their country. Until 2016, Pakistan was the top destination for Afghan medical tourists because of their common culture and language and less expensive treatments than anywhere else in the region, including India. However, patient numbers to Pakistan have considerably decreased and most have gone to India since 2016. The ministry lists several reasons for the diversion including the border management policy of Pakistan, issues in getting Pakistani visas, unnecessary security checks at border crossing points, compulsory police reports and security clearance. Other reasons have included difficulties in getting doctors’ appointments and the rising medical and hotel prices in Pakistan.

Of course, much would depend on what the Taliban does in Afghanistan under Pakistani patronage, which does not look too promising at the moment, says G Parthasarathy, former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan. One can but hope that the gains of medical tourism are not lost in the games of geopolitical brinkmanship.
Medical tourism — the game changer in India’s ties with Taliban
 
On the Political Impasse in Afghanistan
Press Statement
Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State

March 23, 2020

---​

The United States is proud of our partnership with the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the Afghan people, and admires what Afghanistan has achieved since 2001. We have forged a deep bond, especially with Afghan security forces, through shared sacrifice in responding to threats to international peace and security since 2001. Underscoring the national priority the United States attaches to helping bring about a political settlement to forty years of devastating war, Secretary Pompeo came to Kabul today with an urgent message. He spoke directly to the nation’s leaders to impress upon them the need to compromise for the sake of the Afghan people.

The United States deeply regrets that Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and former Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah have informed Secretary Pompeo that they have been unable to agree on an inclusive government that can meet the challenges of governance, peace, and security, and provide for the health and welfare of Afghan citizens. The United States is disappointed in them and what their conduct means for Afghanistan and our shared interests. Their failure has harmed U.S.-Afghan relations and, sadly, dishonors those Afghan, Americans, and Coalition partners who have sacrificed their lives and treasure in the struggle to build a new future for this country.

Because this leadership failure poses a direct threat to U.S. national interests, effective immediately, the U.S. government will initiate a review of the scope of our cooperation with Afghanistan. Among other steps, we are today announcing a responsible adjustment to our spending in Afghanistan and immediately reducing assistance by $1 billion this year. We are prepared to reduce by another $1 billion in 2021. We will also initiate a review of all of our programs and projects to identify additional reductions, and reconsider our pledges to future donor conferences for Afghanistan. We have made clear to the leadership that we will not back security operations that are politically motivated, nor support political leaders who order such operations or those who advocate for or support parallel government.

The United States remains convinced that a political settlement is the only solution to the conflict. We note that Afghan leaders are acting inconsistently with their commitments under the Joint Declaration, chiefly failing to establish an inclusive national team to participate in intra-Afghan negotiations or take practical steps to facilitate prisoner releases by both sides as a confidence-building measure to reach a political settlement and achieve a permanent and comprehensive ceasefire. We are proceeding with the conditions-based withdrawal of our forces in accordance with the U.S.-Taliban agreement.

Should Afghan leaders choose to form an inclusive government that can provide security and participate in the peace process, the United States is prepared to support these efforts and revisit the reviews initiated today.

The United States is not abandoning our partnership with Afghanistan, nor our commitment to support the Afghan security forces, but reviewing the scope of our cooperation given the irresponsible actions of Afghan leaders. To illustrate America’s steadfast commitment to the Afghan people, the United States will be providing $15 million in assistance to help combat the spread of the coronavirus in Afghanistan.

Source: US Department of State
 
Afghanistan, Taliban To Begin Prisoner Releases At End Of Month
March 25, 20203:34 PM ET
Diaa Hadid | Colin Dwyer

gettyimages-1204885363_wide-f638d03b99232871760c89e981c85bfc9a26928b-s800-c85.jpg

Afghan President Ashraf Ghani speaks earlier this month in Jalalabad. Ghani's dispute with Abdullah Abdullah over election results has been cited as one reason for the delay in organizing prisoner releases with the Taliban, a key stipulation in a peace deal announced last month. Noorullah Shirzada/AFP via Getty Images
Prisoners affiliated with the Taliban will soon be released from Afghan lockups, in a move that's likely to kick off peace talks between Afghanistan and the Islamist insurgent group. On Wednesday, a pair of Taliban spokesmen and a U.S. official confirmed the prisoner release — a key condition in the peace framework between the militants and the U.S. announced about a month ago.


Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. special representative for Afghanistan reconciliation, who has been leading U.S. peace talks with the Taliban, said the militant group and the Afghan government agreed to begin releasing their respective prisoners on March 31.


"This is a positive development," he tweeted Wednesday, after an hours-long video conference between representatives of the Afghan government, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the U.S. and the Gulf state of Qatar. "Technical meetings will continue to make sure the process goes smoothly."

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid, in comments to NPR earlier, echoed that timeline. Another Taliban spokesman, Suhail Shaheen, explained Wednesday on Twitter that the Taliban would send a technical delegation to the Bagram prison, a complex on the outskirts of Kabul, to verify the prisoners being released.

The prisoner release is expected to kick off the process of inter-Afghan peace talks, which have been in doubt for weeks despite a deal between the U.S. and the Taliban late last month. The deal, which lays a framework for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan, stipulated the release of up to 5,000 Taliban prisoners in Afghan government detention as a goodwill gesture.

Up to 1,000 Afghan soldiers held by Taliban were also to be released.

But Afghan President Ashraf Ghani initially balked at the timing laid out in the agreement. And recent weeks have seen the country politically paralyzed by a dispute between Ghani and his principal challenger for the presidency, Abdullah Abdullah, over last year's election results.

Earlier this week, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the U.S. had decided to slash $1 billion in aid to Afghanistan after Pompeo failed to reconcile Ghani and Abdullah. Pompeo prevented movement on negotiations with the Taliban.

The proposed inter-Afghan talks, intended to end the four-decade-long conflict in the country and create a power-sharing accord, are part of a broader deal that will see most American and NATO forces withdraw from Afghanistan within 14 months. In return, the Taliban agree not to host militant groups that could harm the security of the United States, and to comply with a partial reduction in violence.

-------------
Source: NPR