Islamic Republic of Pakistan : News, Discussions & Updates

A LOT, they have mobile EW's lurking the valley, hes also plotted a SAM site 90 Km off the LOC which adds to the
threat level abhi faced, hes putting the EW under the dogfight, which changes A LOT, every OSINT map plotted till now
gets reworked and then you have more stuff hidden by the PAF as usual, ORBAT leakage is a VERY high possibility
How are these SAM mapped sir?

India recently launched a satellite that is supposed to track radars and all, will that help us in effective mapping of SAM Batteries and zone?

How was Pakistan able to effectively find area not covered with Indian SAM to intrude? Those Short range SAM's are widely deployed, do we have so big holes even at the most active border of the world?

In future combat how is India going to map them effectively, cant drones be sacrificed for mapping them instead of fighter planes if all other techniques are not working?

Some very rusty performance from IAF was seen during this stand off which is surprising given that the training and exercises put in to be combat ready. Will there be any change internally to improve that?
 
When it comes to India/Pakistan never take 2 things seriously .

1) Gandhis resigning from congress
2) Hafiz saeed arrested by Pakistan police
 
Ever read that resolution. UNSC resolution 47, I mean ? I've seen a lot of Pakistanis harp on about at but hardly anybody ever read it.
I know it and I read it.i know you are talking about vacating pok but problem is are you ready to apply this resolution? You can mount as much pressure as you want on this kulbhushan case but he is in our custody.i think only America can save kulbhushan now.
 
I know it and I read it.i know you are talking about vacating pok but problem is are you ready to apply this resolution?
Are you ? Since the first step is binding(vacating POK) and its a step Pakistan has to take, is your question even legitimate ? Pakistan can't go around asking the world to force India to work according to the resolution and then not take the first step themselves. You inaction on the first step reduces the legitimacy of you stance on the resolution.

You can mount as much pressure as you want on this kulbhushan case but he is in our custody.i think only America can save kulbhushan now.
Speaking of which...........

Kulbhushan Jadhav case: Big win for India as ICJ asks Pakistan to review death sentence

If now Pakistan doesn't grant him consular access, it will further de-legitimize the, frankly farce, Pakistani agenda of forcing India to abide by the resolutions. If you don't go by international laws, how can you expect others to do so.

If you think about it, all of this could have been avoided. All Pakistan had to do was provide him with consular access, then you could have scored a diplomatic brownie point for being humanitarian in the face of the enemy. Now if Pakistan does provide him with consular access it will be viewed not as magnanimity but international pressure.
 
India wins in ICJ. Kulbhushan Jadhav sentencing set aside.


Another forced propaganda video of Kulbhushan to release soon.Probably recorded months ago

There is another thing that could happen. Maybe Kulbhushan can be released by Terroristan and the puppet Niazi will claim "being the bigger man" and claim peace etc
 
Last edited:
Are you ? Since the first step is binding(vacating POK) and its a step Pakistan has to take, is your question even legitimate ? Pakistan can't go around asking the world to force India to work according to the resolution and then not take the first step themselves. You inaction on the first step reduces the legitimacy of you stance on the resolution.


Speaking of which...........

Kulbhushan Jadhav case: Big win for India as ICJ asks Pakistan to review death sentence

If now Pakistan doesn't grant him consular access, it will further de-legitimize the, frankly farce, Pakistani agenda of forcing India to abide by the resolutions. If you don't go by international laws, how can you expect others to do so.

If you think about it, all of this could have been avoided. All Pakistan had to do was provide him with consular access, then you could have scored a diplomatic brownie point for being humanitarian in the face of the enemy. Now if Pakistan does provide him with consular access it will be viewed not as magnanimity but international pressure.
Big win?your application related to his release rejected by icj.judge said it clearly that he will remain under Pakistani custody.only consular access allowed is indian victory.kindly accept facts.on Kashmir,question is are you ready to apply this resolution? Everytime you make excuses.
 
Big win?your application related to his release rejected by icj.judge said it clearly that he will remain under Pakistani custody.only consular access allowed is indian victory.kindly accept facts.on Kashmir,question is are you ready to apply this resolution? Everytime you make excuses.
Dude, read the comment I never said anything about Jadav being handed over to India.

As for excuses on Kashmir, again read the comment, if the first step needs Pakistan to pull out of PoK, and you refuse to do so, how is this India's fault ?
 
Dude, read the comment I never said anything about Jadav being handed over to India.

As for excuses on Kashmir, again read the comment, if the first step needs Pakistan to pull out of PoK, and you refuse to do so, how is this India's fault ?
First question is whether you like to apply resolution or not.if you apply,pakistan should vacate but problem is you aren't ready to even listen about this resolution.conditions will apply only if both parties agrees to apply this resolution.
 
How are these SAM mapped sir?

India recently launched a satellite that is supposed to track radars and all, will that help us in effective mapping of SAM Batteries and zone?

How was Pakistan able to effectively find area not covered with Indian SAM to intrude? Those Short range SAM's are widely deployed, do we have so big holes even at the most active border of the world?

In future combat how is India going to map them effectively, cant drones be sacrificed for mapping them instead of fighter planes if all other techniques are not working?

Some very rusty performance from IAF was seen during this stand off which is surprising given that the training and exercises put in to be combat ready. Will there be any change internally to improve that?


Sir ...

A) Satellite image requests in India come with forms, that need to be filled in triplicate, they then fly sorties between desks, like
all the other things in the sinkhole.

B) Slumber with long time peace postings often lead to operational memory loss, like muscle memory training imparted to
soldier enabling them to assemble a rifle in their sleep, machine training shouldn't be done post incident with 100 jets to calm the domestic angst
and pump the bhakt, should be more regular, often we learn after we fall

They never crossed over, they were at stand-off, we all saw the SAMs work, the results were heartbreaking

C) By breaking free from certain bubbles and doing away with funding hiccups, our friends in IL/USA/RUSSIA have enough to offer and teach
but only an incident with china will shake us enough to go that route
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BlackOpsIndia
First question is whether you like to apply resolution or not.if you apply,pakistan should vacate but problem is you aren't ready to even listen about this resolution.conditions will apply only if both parties agrees to apply this resolution.
First of all talk about illegally selling part of J&K to China
 
First question is whether you like to apply resolution or not.if you apply,pakistan should vacate but problem is you aren't ready to even listen about this resolution.conditions will apply only if both parties agrees to apply this resolution.
Pull pak army out of pok and we can consider implementing the resolution.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gautam
Resolution can only be implemented if both parties agree.written agreement and not just statements.we will never vacate because we know you will never sign any written agreement of this UN resolution.


the resolution clearly states that INDIA IS TO IMPLEMENT A REFERRENDUM ONLY AFTER PAKISTAN PULLS OUT TROOPS.

If you are not ready to vacate then stop braying about implementing referrendum.