Nope. The ASPJ pod(s) are GaN only. Both for Tejas and MKI(during upgrade).Well lets see which company gets and what are the plans, imo initially it will be GaAs prob.
Nope. The ASPJ pod(s) are GaN only. Both for Tejas and MKI(during upgrade).Well lets see which company gets and what are the plans, imo initially it will be GaAs prob.
MKI ew tender seems cancelled again.Nope. The ASPJ pod(s) are GaN only. Both for Tejas and MKI(during upgrade).
The Indian authorities did not mention the use of GaNNope. The ASPJ pod(s) are GaN only. Both for Tejas and MKI(during upgrade).
3:20 onwards, directly from the horse's mouth:The Indian authorities did not mention the use of GaN
View attachment 28897
The other technological highlights mentioned here should be ultra wideband (DRFM) technology, which mainly focuses on improving power density, not affecting existing communication, improving spectrum utilization, and solving the problem of mutual interference between Israeli pods and Russian radars
Not a convincing answer as usual.It's amazing how foreign members like @BMD, @Innominate and the following undermine Indian tech, lol.
3:20 onwards, directly from the horse's mouth:
Any doubt now my Chinese friend?
To tell the truth, I can't understand Indian English. My spoken English is not good. With a strong accent, can you briefly describe what he said?It's amazing how foreign members like @BMD, @Innominate and the following undermine Indian tech, lol.
3:20 onwards, directly from the horse's mouth:
Any doubt now my Chinese friend?
Isn't this the same picture as I foundNot a convincing answer as usual.
DRDO scientist are more like cattle than horse. Talk BS all day and deliver less.
Let me help you with the pod.
@3:20 onwards Alpha Defense guy asked him if the ASPJ pod uses GaN. The scientist replied in affirmative and said that Gallium Nitride chips are produced in-house for this pod.To tell the truth, I can't understand Indian English. My spoken English is not good. With a strong accent, can you briefly describe what he said?
Isn't this the same picture as I found
People underestimate the the time it takes to integrate things like a radar and EW suite. They think it's all plug-and-play. It isn't.
That said, if HAL itself estimates 2022, be prepared for at least a 1 year delay.
And if that's how long it takes to mess around with an already proven airframe (Mk-1), imagine the time to integrate things on a new airframe like Mk-2. When Prasun Sengupta said in his last article of Mk-2 (on which I and @randomradio had an argument) that it would take 3 years to integrate all the avionics & equipment on the prototype prior to first flight, he wasn't kidding.
We're taking 3 years just to change the radar & EW suite on an existing airframe.
Kids these days do not understand how long these things take .That ^^ was back in early 2019
Originally Tejas was conceived as a 1 for 1 replacement for Mig-21. But come next year, with induction of MK1A, we'll have a plane much capable than Mig-21 Bis. With AESA radar and Astra/Derby ER along with ASRAAM/Python 5, one Tejas MK1A may take down 2 or 3 Bisons without much muster. It'll also have digital RWR and all-digital GaN based EW pods. It'll be silent assassin with former and enemy's nightmare with the latter.Mig 21 bison advantage s were cheap, Quick reaction time to get in air and supersonic dash.
Rest all points Tejas exceeds...
@randomradio @Rajput Lion
Functionally, Tejas Mk 1 can replace how many Mig 21 bisons?
Originally Tejas was conceived as a 1 for 1 replacement for Mig-21. But come next year, with induction of MK1A, we'll have a plane much capable than Mig-21 Bis. With AESA radar and Astra/Derby ER along with ASRAAM/Python 5, one Tejas MK1A may take down 2 or 3 Bisons without much muster. It'll also have digital RWR and all-digital GaN based EW pods. It'll be silent assassin with former and enemy's nightmare with the latter.
And best thing about Tejas is that it'll be much more effective than Mig-21 Bison in air to ground strike roles. Once we get all those 83 MK1As along with upgrading MK1s to 1A standard, i.e., 123 MK1As, IAF's capabilities would be much more enhanced. Functionally being an LCA it'll always be a one for one replacement. But that was the design limit and the goal. Don't expect to substitute/replace MKI/Rafale with it.
PS: Having said all of the above, Mig-21 Bison will be missed despite all the ignominy of being Flying Coffin. For a plane to last so long in our service, it must be something special, IMO.
A single LCA MK1A should be able to replace 2 Mig21-BIS which is very good capability and LCA mk2 will have capabilities and capacity to replace 3 Mig21-BIS easily...I am asking like how 1 rafale can replace 3 mirage 2000 in mission effectiveness.
Endurance, range, no of pylons, load bearing capacity, turn around time, mean time between maintenance, advanced guided weapons .. Etc etc ... All put together effectiveness..
Tejas is still a WIP. The definitive answer will come from IAF. Just wait for that. On paper, MK1A looks twice or thrice better(at least) than Mig-21 Bison in every single criteria you've pointed. But does that mean, 1 Tejas MK1A= multiple Mig-21 Bison in all OCA/DCA/CAP etc. missions? Maybe @vstol Jockey would like to enlighten us here!I am asking like how 1 rafale can replace 3 mirage 2000 in mission effectiveness.
Endurance, range, no of pylons, load bearing capacity, turn around time, mean time between maintenance, advanced guided weapons .. Etc etc ... All put together effectiveness..
Yes..Tejas is still a WIP. The definitive answer will come from IAF. Just wait for that. On paper, MK1A looks twice or thrice better(at least) than Mig-21 Bison in every single criteria you've pointed. But does that mean, 1 Tejas MK1A= multiple Mig-21 Bison in all OCA/DCA/CAP etc. missions? Maybe @vstol Jockey would like to enlighten us here!
In ninties, we use to have Mig-21s escorting Jags for strike. Tejas does the job of one such combo. so It is surely much more than Mig-21Bison. Plus it was adjudged to be the best in air to ground targeting by IAF in recent wargames.Tejas is still a WIP. The definitive answer will come from IAF. Just wait for that. On paper, MK1A looks twice or thrice better(at least) than Mig-21 Bison in every single criteria you've pointed. But does that mean, 1 Tejas MK1A= multiple Mig-21 Bison in all OCA/DCA/CAP etc. missions? Maybe @vstol Jockey would like to enlighten us here!