Based on earlier reports, the Nashik production line was meant to begin delivery of Tejas Mk1A from Oct-Nov 2025, so turns out this is much earlier than planned.
Nov 2024, it's been delayed to Mar 2025.
Based on earlier reports, the Nashik production line was meant to begin delivery of Tejas Mk1A from Oct-Nov 2025, so turns out this is much earlier than planned.
I don't think there's space for dual Astras.
yeah buts thats for wvr(asraam) , i was asking for brv (astra)
anyways thanks for answering
What I had said about dual rack pylons was not Hot Air. Now it's coming in open....
Dual rack launcher for astra has been mentioned in couple of previous drdo tenders and other doc. It is unclear if the ejector one or the rail launch (unlikely ?) but there is very good chance its in the work. Whether they put it on mk1a is another thing of course.Depends on whether it's a wishlist loadout or a real one. For now, only pylons for CCMs have been shown.
Mk2 has showed it off for BVR.
Dual rack launcher for astra has been mentioned in couple of previous drdo tenders and other doc. It is unclear if the ejector one or the rail launch (unlikely ?) but there is very good chance its in the work. Whether they put it on mk1a is another thing of course.
Tell us what power you want for the Mk1A and what interface specifications would be suitable and we'll come up with an M88 that complies with these elements in 6 months, in time to avoid delaying the Mk1A. The new 90kN Rafale F5 engine, with the same dimensions as the current M88, is already flying, so making a pseudo F414 will be really easy.GTRE restarted work on Kaveri with afterburner this year. I guess it's our fallback program for both LCA Mk2 and AMCA.
If GE is deliberately stalling the program, which I doubt at this point in time, then Mk1A is in trouble. It will be worse than Marut. And we don't have a quick alternative on the anvil, neither aircraft nor engine.
While France's technological prowess isn't in any doubt , I doubt the redesigning & testing protocols will be of an order of magnitude less than the time it takes for us to wait it out assuming GE can get it's act together & still stick to its committed delivery schedule of delivering the entire lot by 2028 or with a year of delay.Tell us what power you want for the Mk1A and what interface specifications would be suitable and we'll come up with an M88 that complies with these elements in 6 months, in time to avoid delaying the Mk1A. The new 90kN Rafale F5 engine, with the same dimensions as the current M88, is already flying, so making a pseudo F414 will be really easy.
Tell us what power you want for the Mk1A and what interface specifications would be suitable and we'll come up with an M88 that complies with these elements in 6 months, in time to avoid delaying the Mk1A. The new 90kN Rafale F5 engine, with the same dimensions as the current M88, is already flying, so making a pseudo F414 will be really easy.
Year-Over-Year Tejas Mk1 Production & Production Line Performance
• 2014: One Aircraft (Line 1)
• 2015: Zero Production
• 2016: Two Aircraft (Line 1)
• 2017: Three Aircraft (Line 1)
• 2018: Six Aircraft (3 from Line 1 and 3 from Line 2)
• 2019: Four Aircraft (2 from Line 1 and 2 from Line 2)
• 2020: Two Aircraft (Line 1)
• 2021: Seven Aircraft (4 from Line 1 and 3 from Line 2)
• 2022: Seven Aircraft (4 from Line 1 and 3 from Line 2)
• 2023: One Aircraft (from Line 1)
Dassault had commissioned a study from the DGA, which showed that production could be described as industrial provided that a minimum of 11 aircraft were produced each year, otherwise it would be small-scale production, which meant, for example, that parts were not interchangeable from one aircraft to another.