LCA Tejas Mk1 & Mk1A - News and discussions

Lol, what's the basis for buying that many F404s in the first place? Expanding the LCA Mk1A line was an afterthought. And relax, the delay is just 1 year, all the ordered LCAs will still be delivered before schedule regardless of the starting issues. The contract is based on 16 jets a year, production's been expanded to 24, sufficient enough to make up for the delay.
Derisking the critical shortfall of our squadrons.

You now have assembly lines capable of producing 24 jets a year but can not even produce 2-3 jets in a year because of imported product shortfalls.
If shortfall of squadron matter, then any possiblity of delay should be removed beforehand. That includes Engine (extremely critical), Radome (critical), Radar(extremely critical) for the least.

Stock pile them before hand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
Derisking the critical shortfall of our squadrons.

You now have assembly lines capable of producing 24 jets a year but can not even produce 2-3 jets in a year because of imported product shortfalls.
If shortfall of squadron matter, then any possiblity of delay should be removed beforehand. That includes Engine (extremely critical), Radome (critical), Radar(extremely critical) for the least.

Stock pile them before hand.

HAL will make the aircraft without engines & stock up in storage..

When GE delivers, engine will be mated and delivered to IAF.

Somewhere I posted a tweet of some one I think Arihant guy.. that this year HAL is making 14 jets but delivering 5-6 jets...

Later I saw another tweet from someone else is saying only 2 will be delivered this financial year.

Even now IAF can place additional orders, HAL can negotiate with GE to make in India GE 404 along with GE 414..
 
HAL will make the aircraft without engines & stock up in storage..

When GE delivers, engine will be mated and delivered to IAF.

Somewhere I posted a tweet of some one I think Arihant guy.. that this year HAL is making 14 jets but delivering 5-6 jets...

Later I saw another tweet from someone else is saying only 2 will be delivered this financial year.

Even now IAF can place additional orders, HAL can negotiate with GE to make in India GE 404 along with GE 414..
Anyhow, you can not test the airframes unless mated with engine. Delivery will be delayed due to availability of engines.

If HAL had stockpiled critical inputs like engine, radar etc over past 10-15 years, it would have been producing jets at full speed retiring old migs etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
Anyhow, you can not test the airframes unless mated with engine. Delivery will be delayed due to availability of engines.

If HAL had stockpiled critical inputs like engine, radar etc over past 10-15 years, it would have been producing jets at full speed retiring old migs etc.
They're testing airframes with category B engines..

Think u haven't read recent articles..

Here,
GbHR2-KXsAEttj4
@Saaho
 
IAF wants a long range BVR.
Indeed! And Meteor is one of the best one out there.

That is a factor. Actually operating, handling the maintenance is totally different from exercising with some gulf partners.
UAE allows Pakistani airforce pilots to regularly operate the fighter and PAF personnel even provide tactics and maintenance inputs to UAE. UAE herself sucks in operating its own fleet so PAF folks fill in. And yes, that still keeps Rafale extremely potent for us.
They're testing airframes with category B engines..

Think u haven't read recent articles..

Here,

@Saaho
I never take HAL's word on anything related to schedule. If HAL was to be believed, we would be done with Tejas in 2000s. But we know how that works out. There is NO chance in the hell that HAL will deliver MK1As by 2028. We will be seeing HAL still delivering MK1As in 2041 or 42.

They're testing airframes with category B engines..
I do not see this being mentioned anywhere.
 
The way forward should be that we get push for licence production of GE 404 just like we are for 414.
What is funnier is we signed up with ge to produce the 414 but did not even think to set up a factory for license producing 404's considering it will be the backbone of our air fleet for the foreseeable future. The requirement of tejas mk1 actually is somewhere from 300-500. It effectively replaces our entire line of soviet legacy fighters like mig 21,mig 23 and mig 27 and can perform all of those roles better. We had around 800 mig 21's on top of the 200-300 mig23/27's in the 70's-80's.
The Chinese have a fleet of 500+ j-10's on top of 200-300 mig21 copies. Pakistan has around 130+ jf-17's. How do we plan to fight a war of attrition if we just have 200 odd single engine fighters.
 
We'll have our own Meteor(Astra 3) within the next few years. Till then Astra MK2 shall suffice.
We need a pl-15 counter and a pl-17 counter. Meteor is good but too expensive. We need a new bvr missile design in the class of pl-15 and r-37m
Derisking the critical shortfall of our squadrons.

You now have assembly lines capable of producing 24 jets a year but can not even produce 2-3 jets in a year because of imported product shortfalls.
If shortfall of squadron matter, then any possiblity of delay should be removed beforehand. That includes Engine (extremely critical), Radome (critical), Radar(extremely critical) for the least.

Stock pile them before hand.
That was the same issue with the Arjun. The German engine was imported. On top of that the engine used on Arjun was of leopard 1 series not even leopard 2. Heck the Chinese got access for the leopard 2 engine but we couldn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
We need a pl-15 counter and a pl-17 counter. Meteor is good but too expensive. We need a new bvr missile design in the class of pl-15 and r-37m
Astra MK2 is in the same class as PL-15. PL-17 is a VLRAAM and so far we don't have an analogue for that.

Astra MK3 would be in Meteor class which means far superior than any PLAAF BVR missile.

PS: Chinese are also working on PL-21, i.e., SFDR variant of PL-15. If they deploy it before Astra 3, then both PLAAF and IAF would be at par in terms of BVRs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aniruddha
Astra MK2 is in the same class as PL-15. PL-17 is a VLRAAM and so far we don't have an analogue for that.

Astra MK3 would be in Meteor class which means far superior than any PLAAF BVR missile.

PS: Chinese are also working on PL-21, i.e., SFDR variant of PL-15. If they deploy it before Astra 3, then both PLAAF and IAF would be at par in terms of BVRs.
Astra mk2 is closer to amraam 120d not pl-15. Pl-15 is a bigger missile. Although pl-15e range is 145km. Provided Chinese claims are true the non-export version would have a range of 200-300km. How true are the numbers?? No idea.
We need four bvr missiles
An amraam-d equivalent (astra mk2)
A pl-15/17/aim 174bequivalent (does not exist)
An r-37m/aim 54 equivalent (does not exist)
A meteor equivalent (astra mk3/sfdr)
 
  • Like
Reactions: LX1111
We'll have our own Meteor(Astra 3) within the next few years. Till then Astra MK2 shall suffice.
Minimum 30-40 years away. Look at Astra-Mk1 development time and now Astra-Mk2. Highly doubt it is getting inducted before 2060.

A pl-15/17/aim 174bequivalent (does not exist)
An r-37m/aim 54 equivalent (does not exist)
R-37M can and should be imported immediately. It should be integrated into Su-30MKIs.
PL-15 analogue is not really needed, Meteor kind of missile fills that role.
 
We need a pl-15 counter and a pl-17 counter. Meteor is good but too expensive. We need a new bvr missile design in the class of pl-15 and r-37m
I do not think Meteor is really expensive. If Meteor takes out a single aircraft it pays several times its worth. Meteor has really high chance of hitting fighters compared to other missiles.
 
Meteor is the most expensive BVR available today. All BVRs hit on an aircraft pays several times its worth.
But not all BVRs have no escape zone like meteor and chances to hit the target. For that reason, I do not believe Meteor is expensive.
 
But not all BVRs have no escape zone like meteor and chances to hit the target. For that reason, I do not believe Meteor is expensive.
It is objectively expensive when it costs three times as much as a normal BVR missile. In medium to long-range fire-and-forget mode, all BVR missiles perform abysmally. The slight advantage in No-Escape Zone (NEZ) for the Meteor doesn't necessarily make it worth it every time. Otherwise, air forces like the USAF would have abandoned the AMRAAM for the Meteor.