Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates

According to rumors on SM, firefight @ 3PM happened after PLA tried to retake heights from IA. This may have happened again at 10PM.
 

He is still in the pre-information age. WW1 was in a completely different time. Tactics, training and technology were completely different.

And then, he's decided to neglect the capabilities of the IAF entirely. Today A2G weapons and even artillery can hit moving targets.

Finally he's not considered logistics, which is quite surprising. And the fact that the supply chain can also be bombed, like what happened during Kargil.
 
He is still in the pre-information age. WW1 was in a completely different time. Tactics, training and technology were completely different.

And then, he's decided to neglect the capabilities of the IAF entirely. Today A2G weapons and even artillery can hit moving targets.

Finally he's not considered logistics, which is quite surprising. And the fact that the supply chain can also be bombed, like what happened during Kargil.
WW-1 was an analogy. Having said that, he isn't in a minority when he says we won't win a 2 front war. Not unless it goes nuclear in which case there won't be anything worth winning.

A2G & artillery could hit targets 50 years ago too.

Attacking logistics is a 2 way street.

Finally, this gentleman is 70+ & has spent more than half his life studying our security policies , military, it's philosophy, equipment, orbat , etc apart from being commissioned by the MoD (?) to jointly author 2 books & several others he has penned & published over the decades on these very subjects. He has a PhD & was in the process of completing a couple of more which weren't awarded for want of submitting a thesis.

You think you know more than him. Feel free to join issues with him on Twitter. Either you'd teach him a thing or 2 (highly unlikely) or if you have the humility (extremely doubtful) you'd learn a thing or 2.
 
WW-1 was an analogy. Having said that, he isn't in a minority when he says we won't win a 2 front war. Not unless it goes nuclear in which case there won't be anything worth winning.

A2G & artillery could hit targets 50 years ago too.

Attacking logistics is a 2 way street.

Finally, this gentleman is 70+ & has spent more than half his life studying our security policies , military, it's philosophy, equipment, orbat , etc apart from being commissioned by the MoD (?) to jointly author 2 books & several others he has penned & published over the decades on these very subjects. He has a PhD & was in the process of completing a couple of more which weren't awarded for want of submitting a thesis.

You think you know more than him. Feel free to join issues with him on Twitter. Either you'd teach him a thing or 2 (highly unlikely) or if you have the humility (extremely doubtful) you'd learn a thing or 2.
Well I also thought about saying the same thing, having read his previous analysis on twitter and type of response he got from like of Panag and even our @Falcon. But then, you beat me to it.
 

Can we hire this Mayor of Prague as Mayor of Leh? :love:

1598921351760.png
 
Its my own guess - based on what the various economic publications are saying about China's economic situation. They are up the proverbial shit creek without a paddle.

Wars cost money and with the Taiwan question hanging - Chinks dont have enough to go around.
Neither do we