Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates

sometimes it gets difficult to follow the discussion here. sometimes people say india has full planready for the 2.5 front and to liberate Lahsa. The same people at some other point will say we need time to modernise roads, buy more weapons improve economy and we need to wait and so on. The discussions simply seems to binary oscillate between these two point of views.

The infrastructure and modernisation only improves our ability to achieve objectives. It's not either/or.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire
Chinese abduct 5 civilians from arunachal and are not responding to our hotline.
We stopped 3 Chinese civilians in a car who crossed over! in sikkim by mistake, gave them biscuits and tea and immediately showed them the way back .
Says a lot about our naivety and desire to be seen as peaceful, a weakness .
And also about our border security in these times of heightened tensions, that a car can just drive into our areas .
 
The SFF has a total strength of upwards of 10,000 men, probably close to 15,000 men inclusive of the 4th Vikas battalion under R&AW. The SFF which participated in 1971 & later operations didn't include 4th Vikas.

Not only men, it has women as well though may be very less in numbers.
 
SFF is special forces, right? It's there a reason we needed SFF that day instead of just regular forces?

Will we need SF each time we need to "readjust" some top?
 
SFF is special forces, right? It's there a reason we needed SFF that day instead of just regular forces?

Will we need SF each time we need to "readjust" some top?
No not special forces... But not regular infantry either. I think their training is equivalent to Ghatak cdos. And, about capturing territory, they are in their element.

Or so I think given recent successes. I may be wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashwin
SFF is special forces, right? It's there a reason we needed SFF that day instead of just regular forces?

Will we need SF each time we need to "readjust" some top?
They are a para-military force outside the command structure of army. Special because they are specially recruited from mainly Tibetan origin families. Commanding officers are deputed from the Army.

4th Vikas aka Special Group is 'Special Force' volunteer-driven from all arms under R&AW. It is a fully covert unit used for all kinds of missions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yashpatel604
They are a para-military force outside the command structure of army. Special because they are specially recruited from mainly Tibetan origin families. Commanding officers are deputed from the Army.

4th Vikas aka Special Group is 'Special Force' volunteer-driven from all arms under R&AW. It is a fully covert unit used for all kinds of missions.
My enquiry is that whether the role they played that day, taking over the top was something normal infantry unable to do?

Because we surely don't have enough of them if we need their capabilities to take over each top incase a war breaks out.

If we don't need their brand of capabilities in this scenario, was their involvement a more...signalling than necessity?
 
My enquiry is that whether the role they played that day, taking over the top was something normal infantry unable to do?

Because we surely don't have enough of them if we need their capabilities to take over each top incase a war breaks out.

If we don't need their brand of capabilities in this scenario, was their involvement a more...signalling than necessity?
Why can't the normal army units do it ? Any unit trained in mountain warfare should be about to capture such heights. Since SFF members are native to these area and climate they would be better acclimated for the task. Also possibly signalling.
 
My enquiry is that whether the role they played that day, taking over the top was something normal infantry unable to do?

Because we surely don't have enough of them if we need their capabilities to take over each top incase a war breaks out.

If we don't need their brand of capabilities in this scenario, was their involvement a more...signalling than necessity?


That's probably because we are crossing LAC first time. SFF was sent to 'test the waters'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sanglamorre
My enquiry is that whether the role they played that day, taking over the top was something normal infantry unable to do?

Because we surely don't have enough of them if we need their capabilities to take over each top in case a war breaks out.

If we don't need their brand of capabilities in this scenario, was their involvement a more...signalling than necessity?


They are raised of one purpose, This purpose. So why not use them for the purpose they raised for?

And about using specialized forces to take over some strategic posts, why not? If using specialized troops give us an edge over regular PLA infantry in a particular operation, once again, why not? In conflict situation, you use all edge you can have over adversary, even if regular infantry can take over those hills. Under utilization of available assets is not a good idea.