Including IA I guess.There is not going to be anyone there in winter.
Including IA I guess.There is not going to be anyone there in winter.
sometimes it gets difficult to follow the discussion here. sometimes people say india has full planready for the 2.5 front and to liberate Lahsa. The same people at some other point will say we need time to modernise roads, buy more weapons improve economy and we need to wait and so on. The discussions simply seems to binary oscillate between these two point of views.
The SFF has a total strength of upwards of 10,000 men, probably close to 15,000 men inclusive of the 4th Vikas battalion under R&AW. The SFF which participated in 1971 & later operations didn't include 4th Vikas.
There is not going to be anyone there in winter.
Including IA I guess.
No not special forces... But not regular infantry either. I think their training is equivalent to Ghatak cdos. And, about capturing territory, they are in their element.SFF is special forces, right? It's there a reason we needed SFF that day instead of just regular forces?
Will we need SF each time we need to "readjust" some top?
Chinese are cunning. Expect diversionary build ups and incursions in areas where they are assured of some success.
Two Front War will DEFINITELY HAPPEN
They are a para-military force outside the command structure of army. Special because they are specially recruited from mainly Tibetan origin families. Commanding officers are deputed from the Army.SFF is special forces, right? It's there a reason we needed SFF that day instead of just regular forces?
Will we need SF each time we need to "readjust" some top?
My enquiry is that whether the role they played that day, taking over the top was something normal infantry unable to do?They are a para-military force outside the command structure of army. Special because they are specially recruited from mainly Tibetan origin families. Commanding officers are deputed from the Army.
4th Vikas aka Special Group is 'Special Force' volunteer-driven from all arms under R&AW. It is a fully covert unit used for all kinds of missions.
Why can't the normal army units do it ? Any unit trained in mountain warfare should be about to capture such heights. Since SFF members are native to these area and climate they would be better acclimated for the task. Also possibly signalling.My enquiry is that whether the role they played that day, taking over the top was something normal infantry unable to do?
Because we surely don't have enough of them if we need their capabilities to take over each top incase a war breaks out.
If we don't need their brand of capabilities in this scenario, was their involvement a more...signalling than necessity?
My enquiry is that whether the role they played that day, taking over the top was something normal infantry unable to do?
Because we surely don't have enough of them if we need their capabilities to take over each top incase a war breaks out.
If we don't need their brand of capabilities in this scenario, was their involvement a more...signalling than necessity?
My enquiry is that whether the role they played that day, taking over the top was something normal infantry unable to do?
Because we surely don't have enough of them if we need their capabilities to take over each top in case a war breaks out.
If we don't need their brand of capabilities in this scenario, was their involvement a more...signalling than necessity?
SFF is special forces, right? It's there a reason we needed SFF that day instead of just regular forces?
Will we need SF each time we need to "readjust" some top?
I am not an expert in this domain but here is the expert's view on the same