No wonder the explanation & graphics were so illuminating. The channel is by Rohit Vats. I'd encourage all of you to subscribe to it on YT & his handle in Twitter. I just managed the first 5 min. Will complete it late evening .
Cry me a river .. Comrades.
The Chinese CCP.is very angry with Modi
Probably means they are going to stay and hold the position, meaning there's not going to be a fight.
There's no Nirbhay ever inducted in our Armed Forces, no user-trials ever conducted, either.
So, what real options do we have - except a prohibitively expensive Brahmos - when it comes to launching barrages & sustained volleys over long-ranges - in excess of 90 kms ?
We need an cost-effective option, beyond extremely riskier one likes IAF, where platform & especially personnel costs are almost irreparable losses in short-term @Milspec @randomradio
Seems they don't have the guts to fire the first shot. IA should take full advantage of this. As the saying goes, "a barking dog seldom bites".
Keep pushing the Chinese and keep grabbing land. We shall see what's the threshold of these jokers are.
KALI is not a bombThere were some reports/rumor once that reaction has been achieved in lab environment. But you still need to make a proper bomb out of it. Not sure if it has been done
must be something classified like KALI. I heard there are labs under sea some distance from mumbai seashore where they work on such things. That area is protected by navy.
Fighter jets. There's nothing more cost effective or reliable than fighter jets beyond the range of artillery.
I don't think we plan to do anything more than what's already done. It's China's move now.
Yes, that's the justification offered in favour of Aircraft Carriers, over having Arsenal-class DDG's - that delivering munitions via Aircrafts is soo cost-effective.
However, we shouldn't miss the fact that we are barely a 28 fighter-squadron IAF, while PAF alone fields close to 18 squadrons (?), & combined with our arch-nemesis, PLAAF & PAF hold an unbeatable numerical superiority over us.
PLAAF Flanker rip-off's alone outnumber our IAF by a significant measure.
Even if they cannot commit all to WTC, committing our IAF towards relentless Ground-Strikes in a highly-defended airspace controlled by Chinks isn't the sanest of strategy.
Loss of IAF platforms in an intense war would be irreplaceable in short-term. As everyone is aware, Pilot-training involves years & years of flying & a lot more. I know. I have failed PABT.
That's why cruise-missiles & longer-ranged guided rockets. There is no substitute. IAF not in the least, which should initially, rather focus on Air-dominance & CAP's.
If all bodes well, then ground-strikes barrages can definitely be sustained. Not before completely knocking-off hostile Air-Defence with subsonic CM's, which we don't have in numbers.
So, we choose to send our pilots the harm's way. Avoidable .................by better planning & threat-based procurement.
PLAAF Flanker rip-off's alone outnumber our IAF by a significant measure.
That's why cruise-missiles & longer-ranged guided rockets.
So, we choose to send our pilots the harm's way. Avoidable .................by better planning & threat-based procurement.