Very well said. There are many like him. I sometimes how easily they get influenced by Pakistani propaganda style.
Lamba fekne wala feku, bohot lamba fenkne wala feku, fir atehai apna bababanaras
Even if the IA or the IAF or both conduct precision strikes, I doubt they're going to publicly announce the same. Pakistan too would keep their mouths shut. That's all along been the official positions of both sides respectively. It suits us just fine. It suits the shameless Paxtanis fine as well.We get to accomplish our aims & send a message across. Pakistan gets to accept their losses & the message w/o loss of face. The problem arises only when there's another Pulwama like strike. Then matters become complicated & unpredictable.Very well said. There are many like him. I sometimes how easily they get influenced by Pakistani propaganda style.
India isn't Pakistan. We give due to our forces publicly if it's done by army, airforce, navy or coastguard. Except in spies tradecraft we give due in secrecy, that's my understanding talking to my people on the job.Even if the IA or the IAF or both conduct precision strikes, I doubt they're going to publicly announce the same. Pakistan too would keep their mouths shut. That's all along been their official positions of both sides respectively. It suits us just fine. It suits the shameless Paxtanis fine as well.We get to accomplish our aims & send a message across. Pakistan gets to accept their losses & the message w/o loss of face. The problem arises only when there's another Pulwama like strike. Then matters become complicated & unpredictable.
Airforce chief was there, so was the statement from army chief today. Some people just live in warped hallucinations, what can we do about them. Just sit back and chill!BABA says the operation was before Diwali.
The CFVs happened after that
We've conducted airstrikes before as well in the immediate aftermath of Kargil & later as well as surgical strikes by the IA - all unpublicized. It's only after this government came to power that we started publicizing them that too, these actions have been more reactionary than pre emptory. If what's being reported is true, it's pre emptory. I very much doubt we'd publicise it i.e officially confirm it as opposed to speculations by MSM .India isn't Pakistan. We give due to our forces publicly if it's done by army, airforce, navy or coastguard. Except in spies tradecraft we give due in secrecy, that's my understanding talking to my people on the job.
Even if the IA or the IAF or both conduct precision strikes, I doubt they're going to publicly announce the same. Pakistan too would keep their mouths shut. That's all along been the official positions of both sides respectively. It suits us just fine. It suits the shameless Paxtanis fine as well.We get to accomplish our aims & send a message across. Pakistan gets to accept their losses & the message w/o loss of face. The problem arises only when there's another Pulwama like strike. Then matters become complicated & unpredictable.
Perhaps I didn't make my point clear initially. Yes, I am discussing about current scenario only. Living in past isn't my forte mate.We've conducted airstrikes before as well in the immediate aftermath of Kargil & later as well as surgical strikes by the IA - all unpublicized. It's only after this government came to power that we started publicizing them that too, these actions have been more reactionary than pre emptory. If what's being reported is true, it's pre emptory. I very much doubt we'd publicise it i.e officially confirm it as opposed to speculations by MSM .
As of now there is no official report except the engagement by army on 13th Nov(?), So I will desist from commenting further unless reporting done by news media channels (reality, speculation or otherwise) or by DGMO/MEA channels. Thank you.The only contradiction to this theory is - Pakistan tries to infiltrate terrorists for the purpose of creating a Pulwama like situation.
If you try a good number of times, the probability of success increases. So by that logic, it is just a matter of time. So does Pak want a public face off?
On the other hand if (and a very big if) there has been an action by IAF, it happened to stop another Pulwama from happening - so why help Pak with the face saver? If another Pulwama happens, then also will we give them a face saving exit (again) ? Our functioning paradigm is beyond my understanding.
Every news channel is reporting air strikes by IAF inside POK. denial by Pak is the best thing for us. We will keep hitting them and they will continue to get hit and deny it. Seems what I had posted on LAC thread to take out Pakistan while we keep china at bay on LAC due to heavy snowfall, has found favour with Government. we will now incite them for another Operation Swift Retort. Last time they did a nanga nach or naked cabaret on 27th feb and have now have nothing left to hide. If you remember my posts of that time and also that of @Falcon, PAF has lost the ability to operate freely north of Lahore Latitude. If they come up, we will engage them and destroy them.
As of now there is no official report except the engagement by army on 13th Nov(?), So I will desist from commenting further unless reporting done by news media channels (reality, speculation or otherwise) or by DGMO/MEA channels. Thank you.