The next 50 years after 2045. And if they found enough people to embark.In the next 50 yrs , Australia thanks to it's SSNs will be dominating the Indo Pacific.
Interesting. What is the answer ?Qu'est-ce que c'est?
View attachment 22708
View attachment 22709
![]()
F-22 Raptor Spotted Flying With Stealthy Underwing Pods
The pods are likely part of an ongoing initiative to retain the F-22's potency until its replacement arrives.www.thedrive.com
The answer is the F-22 isn't as stealthy anymore & maintaining it's stealth is breaking the USAF's a r se sorry budget which he can't bring himself to admit on pain of death. So like all Americans he makes a virtue out of a necessity & claims this appendage as a triumph of upgradation / modernization .Interesting. What is the answer ?
I found this bird always beautifull.
Interesting. What is the answer ?
I found this bird always beautifull, very slender. Not that uggly Turkey.
Parking queen says Le frenchmen as a whole squadron worth of his plane is being cannibalized for parts as its ready rate stands at 50%.The good thing about the F-35 is that it is an aircraft that does not need to fly. In fact, for the past two months, the entire F-35 fleet has been flying less than 10 hours per month. The learning curve of the entire F-35 fleet is certainly a bit ahead of that of Australia and its air marshal, who states that the reduction in flight hours corresponds to a learning curve for the aircraft that apparently is not yet complete:
According to LM's records (fastfack):
Over the month of December the 700 F-35s flew 7000 hours, same in January ....
Less than 10 flight hours per month per F-35 in December ...
Nearly 9 flight hours per F-35 in January (760 F-35) . Taking the word of the RAAF Air Marshall and considering the way the learning curve goes it is not optimal there is still potential to learn more ...
@WHOHE, @Optimist : you are aware that with such a parking queen making war will be complicated even by injecting extraordinary means ?ts."
Facts are hard I know ...Parking queen says Le frenchmen as a whole squadron worth of his plane is being cannibalized for parts as its ready rate stands at 50%.
Blk 3 and F-15EX are the only ones that could match.f-16 will be easily taken out by Rafale Lockheed never fixed the RCS issues and there's no major electronic upgrade apart from the sabr aesa which is just standard GaAs radar not even GaN like the Super-hornets. Rafale would defeat the f-15EX in bvr. While the f-18 would lose in wvr although the pilot matters in this case because all of them are equally capable fighters with superiority in a certain fields.I asked for a reason, honey.
That ugly turkey is faster and deadlier than your Rafail. Rafail came in third in Swiss and didn't even make it to the next round for Finns.
Your plane does well in the third world and second world market where the F-35 is not offered. French have no issues selling their "high-tech" french plane to these nations because compared to F-35 your plane isn't that high-tech.
Hell Dassault had to bribe India to take 36 of their planes.
When it comes to 4th gen fighters and their advanced tech and capabilities the rankings are like this...
F-15ex
F-18E blk III
F-16V
F-18E blkII
Five is a tossup between french plane F3 and Typhoon T3.
Lol. Look Bubba you are reading way too much into a nothing burger as usual and it's only going to make you look even more foolish than you already look. Take a guess why if you can... I'm gonna give you all the time you need. I'll give you a hint... It is a different philosophy of training due to... well just read what the Swiss report said.Facts are hard I know ...
But now we know how the f-35 are so stealth in the air.
The swiss report say that they have projected a 15 hours / month use not a 9 hours. That only mean that the inverted learning curve is not optimal and could go to ? what ? 6 hours perhaps ? Or even better due to ... tell me ... simulation ?well just read what the Swiss report said.
Rafale came first in UAE. Your uggly bird, only IOC after 15 years of dev, is too costly for such a rich country.I asked for a reason, honey.
That ugly turkey is faster and deadlier than your Rafail. Rafail came in third in Swiss and didn't even make it to the next round for Finns.
Your plane does well in the third world and second world market where the F-35 is not offered. French have no issues selling their "high-tech" french plane to these nations because compared to F-35 your plane isn't that high-tech.
Hell Dassault had to bribe India to take 36 of their planes.
When it comes to 4th gen fighters and their advanced tech and capabilities the rankings are like this...
F-15ex
F-18E blk III
F-16V
F-18E blkII
Five is a tossup between french plane F3 and Typhoon T3.
Ah ! It's no wonder the availability rates of the Lightnings don't matter at all. With a training rate of 10 hrs / month which translates to 120 per annum the Lightnings don't need any service at all . There's literally no down time . They'd always be available 100% & battle ready . In fact I suspect the Lightnings with it's incredible range only ought to be shipped to a base near the conflict & would unleash it's full spectrum EA from the base itself without flying into the conflict zone .Lol. Look Bubba you are reading way too much into a nothing burger as usual and it's only going to make you look even more foolish than you already look. Take a guess why if you can... I'm gonna give you all the time you need. I'll give you a hint... It is a different philosophy of training due to... well just read what the Swiss report said.
Funny how you frogs are obsessed with our F-35's while US military aviation enthusiasts don't give your plane the slightest consideration. Go figure.
Blk 3 and F-15EX are the only ones that could match.
f-16 will be easily taken out by Rafale Lockheed never fixed the RCS issues and there's no major electronic upgrade apart from the sabr aesa which is just standard GaAs radar not even GaN like the Super-hornets.
Rafale would defeat the f-15EX in bvr.
While the f-18 would lose in wvr although the pilot matters in this case because all of them are equally capable fighters with superiority in a certain fields.
Lol. There was no competition in UAE. UAE actually made a deal with Trump for F-35's until Biden said no. That is when UAE decided to announce purchase of frech plane. UAE still wants F-35's.Rafale came first in UAE. Your uggly bird, only IOC after 15 years of dev, is too costly for such a rich country.
I think Switzerland and Finland will cry in 10 years, with astonishing support costs.
And about your wet finger rank, just remember Rafale M regularly beat SH18 in training.
And F15EX is not operational yet. So.... all is said.
Lol. There was no competition in UAE. UAE actually made a deal with Trump for F-35's until Biden said no. That is when UAE decided to announce purchase of frech plane. UAE still wants F-35's.
Wonder why UAE and Greece didn't just buy the Super-hornets if it's so great?? The soyper hornet can't even supercruise.More than a match. Blk3 has more advanced EW capability that is an offensive weapon unlike your plane. Blk 3 AESA with AN/ALQ-214 together work as an offensive jammer something french plane doesn't have. It's AESA has no EW capability while F-18E II/III has EW jamming and can also be used to guide SM-6's and PAC-3's like the F-35 because of its FireControl-CounterAir capabilities.
Do you have the link to what you are claiming? It's always best to check the link with you.The good thing about the F-35 is that it is an aircraft that does not need to fly. In fact, for the past two months, the entire F-35 fleet has been flying less than 10 hours per month. The learning curve of the entire F-35 fleet is certainly a bit ahead of that of Australia and its air marshal, who states that the reduction in flight hours corresponds to a learning curve for the aircraft that apparently is not yet complete:
According to LM's records (fastfack):
Over the month of December the 700 F-35s flew 7000 hours, same in January ....
Less than 10 flight hours per month per F-35 in December ...
Nearly 9 flight hours per F-35 in January (760 F-35) . Taking the word of the RAAF Air Marshall and considering the way the learning curve goes it is not optimal there is still potential to learn more ...
@WHOHE, @Optimist : you are aware that with such a parking queen making war will be complicated even by injecting extraordinary means ?ts."
-No competition but a customer knows to be very requiring (they use the best of each F16 and M2000).Lol. There was no competition in UAE. UAE actually made a deal with Trump for F-35's until Biden said no. That is when UAE decided to announce purchase of frech plane. UAE still wants F-35's.
Do you have the link to what you are claiming? It's always best to check the link with you.
A link to a forum is of no value. what on the page do you want me to look at. I couldn't see Australia with a quick look. we don't have 700 planes. What manner of fantasy are you running now? Have you stopped taking your medication, or do need to increase it?View topic - F-35 program documents • F-16.net
Military aviation forum since 2003, with high quality discussion focusing on the F-16, F-35 and F-22 jet fighters and the C-130.www.f-16.net
The good thing about the F-35 is that it is an aircraft that does not need to fly. In fact, for the past two months, the entire F-35 fleet has been flying less than 10 hours per month. The learning curve of the entire F-35 fleet is certainly a bit ahead of that of Australia and its air marshal, who states that the reduction in flight hours corresponds to a learning curve for the aircraft that apparently is not yet complete:
According to LM's records (fastfack):
Over the month of December the 700 F-35s flew 7000 hours, same in January ....
Less than 10 flight hours per month per F-35 in December ...
Nearly 9 flight hours per F-35 in January (760 F-35) . Taking the word of the RAAF Air Marshall and considering the way the learning curve goes it is not optimal there is still potential to learn more ...
@WHOHE, @Optimist : you are aware that with such a parking queen making war will be complicated even by injecting extraordinary means ?ts."