Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning and F-22 'Raptor' : News & Discussion

According to this Raptor pilot, TVC of Raptor is very useful and Raptor is far better than F35 in air to air role.

- F35 is a CAS and air to ground platform with air to air second role. It has an average T/W ratio. No supercruise, no super agility, quite heavy so in air to air more reheat use = not IR stealthy.
- F22 is a pure air to air fighter with a light air to ground capacity. Better T/W ratio, nearly no need of reheat for IR trace, high rank agility.

The result is fully logic.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Amarante
- F35 is a CAS and air to ground platform with air to air second role. It has an average T/W ratio. No supercruise, no super agility, quite heavy so in air to air more reheat use = not IR stealthy.
- F22 is a pure air to air fighter with a light air to ground capacity. Better T/W ratio, nearly no need of reheat for IR trace, high rank agility.

The result is fully logic.
Still spouting tired old BS? Give it up dude at this point only ignorant morons who know nothing about the F-35 and only get their info from what they here by Rafale fanboys buys this crap. The Swiss said it all when it came to the F-35's air to air capability... Rafale didn't cum close.
 
The Swiss said it all when it came to the F-35's air to air capability... Rafale didn't cum close.
Strangely they didn't reveal the detail of eval....
Strangely the Swiss said to the french somes weeks before that the 2 deals was for them... why if the game was over?
Strangely all changed just after the Joe Biden visit...
Strangely the Swiss bank interests in USA are just decisivs.

Only a moron can ignore that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Amarante
Yet when the deal to buy the Rafale was still on the table....They were wonderful :)

Is there bigger 'Le Troll ' on the internet than the French?

 
Last edited:
(SydneyMorningHerald, oct.10)

@Innominate , @Optimist ,
How to explain this?:
(...) New figures release by the government show the biggest contributor to the $6.5 billion cost blowout is the F-35A joint strike fighter program, which is expected to cost $2.4 billion more than the $16 billion originally estimated.
The acquisition of a fleet of Boeing P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol and reconnaissance aircraft was the second-biggest factor, coming in at $1.8 billion over the original estimate.
(...)


AUKUS submarines to add $100 billion to defence bill
The purchase of eight nuclear submarines under the AUKUS pact is expected to add at least another $100 billion to the nation’s already ballooning defence bill, as the Albanese government seeks to rein in cost blowouts and delays of major military projects.
The government went on the attack over defence spending on Monday, accusing the Coalition of “bungling” the portfolio in government by focussing on new project announcements rather than delivering the assets required to keep the nation safe.
The government released an analysis showing the Australian Defence Force has 28 major projects running behind schedule, with cumulative delays of 97 years and a total cost blowout of $6.5 billion.
Defence spending is set to hit $80 billion a year by the end of the decade, up from $49 billion currently. Crucially, that figure does not include the cost of nuclear submarines or an expansion in Australian Defence Force personnel.

Marcus Hellyer, a former senior public servant in the Department of Defence, said there were many uncertainties involved, but he expects the cost of the nuclear-powered submarines to reach at least $100 billion in inflation-adjusted figures.
“There is a lot of pressure on the defence budget,” said Hellyer, now an analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
The final figure will depend on factors such as which submarine model the government selects and how much of the construction process takes place in Australia, he said.
Defence Minister Richard Marles has said the model will be announced by March next year.
Defence spending is already expected to hit 2.2 per cent of gross domestic product by the end of the decade, up from 2 per cent currently and its highest level since the early 1990s.
Marles said problems with major projects were “not the fault of the Department of Defence”, an argument countered by the Coalition.
Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said that “departmental secretaries and departments have responsibility as well” as politicians when key projects go awry.
“Their task is to operationalise the projects that we select,” he said.
Hastie said the opposition was “not interested in history wars, we’re interested in preparing for wars of the future”.

New figures release by the government show the biggest contributor to the $6.5 billion cost blowout is the F-35A joint strike fighter program, which is expected to cost $2.4 billion more than the $16 billion originally estimated.
The acquisition of a fleet of Boeing P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol and reconnaissance aircraft was the second-biggest factor, coming in at $1.8 billion over the original estimate.

The purchase of a fleet of helicopters has had the biggest blowout in terms of time, running over a decade behind schedule.
Speaking to reporters in Canberra, Marles said the government would pursue “an activist management of defence procurement going forward”.
“Defence needs to justify every dollar it spends,” he said, vowing to take the blame for problems with future projects.
“We accept the responsibility of government, and we do so going forward,” he said.
“It’s not ultimately for departments to stand here and accept responsibility for government performance. It is ministers. And we understand that’s what it is to be a minister.”
The government will also have to find money to pay for a promised 18,500 additional personnel for the Australian Defence Force and Defence civilian workforce in the years to 2040.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bon Plan
Numbers by themselves mean little. What year was the 16 billion estimate? There could be your answer.
I haven't looked at the Poseidon
The sub will finish up at 200 billion with support. It depends what you count.

The frog sub was 225 billion
 
Last edited:
(SydneyMorningHerald, oct.10)

@Innominate , @Optimist ,
How to explain this?:
(...) New figures release by the government show the biggest contributor to the $6.5 billion cost blowout is the F-35A joint strike fighter program, which is expected to cost $2.4 billion more than the $16 billion originally estimated.
The acquisition of a fleet of Boeing P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol and reconnaissance aircraft was the second-biggest factor, coming in at $1.8 billion over the original estimate.
(...)


AUKUS submarines to add $100 billion to defence bill
The purchase of eight nuclear submarines under the AUKUS pact is expected to add at least another $100 billion to the nation’s already ballooning defence bill, as the Albanese government seeks to rein in cost blowouts and delays of major military projects.
What does this have to do about your claim you made about the F-35's performance in air to air?

Your deflection denied!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Amarante
The frog sub was 225 billion
LOL.
Official source said in the 50 billions.

I give a source, a thing you are not able to do :


"A cabinet submission drafted by Greg Sammut, and released after an FOI request, was sent to the Defence deputy secretary responsible for shipbuilding, Tony Dalton, 34 days before the cancellation of the program on August 20 last year.

It said: "The updated program cost estimate is $46.4 billion in 2016 constant dollars, which remains within the original acquisition cost estimate of $50 billion in 2016 constant dollars announced at the outset of the Attack class submarine program in April 2016".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Amarante
Yet when the deal to buy the Rafale was still on the table....They were wonderful :)

Is there bigger 'Le Troll ' on the internet than the French?

pub LM.png
 
What does this have to do about your claim you made about the F-35's performance in air to air?
i think your most technologically-advanced helmet sight of all time, also the most expensive, goes off target: i never mentioned the air-to-air capabilities of the Turkey. Although it is true that it was designed for ground attack missions.
When it works.
 
Numbers by themselves mean little. What year was the 16 billion estimate? There could be your answer.
I haven't looked at the Poseidon
The sub will finish up at 200 billion with support. It depends what you count.

The frog sub was 225 billion
As I said above, "Numbers by themselves mean little" "It depends what you count". As I posted a link where lifetime cost of the frog sub was 225 billion.
I guess the frog rants are what happens. When ignorant french, with nationalistic pride is hurt.
 
Last edited:
As I said above, "Numbers by themselves mean little" "It depends what you count". As I posted a link where lifetime cost of the frog sub was 225 billion.
I guess the frog rants are what happens. When ignorant french, with nationalistic pride is hurt.
Your link is a tabloid.... so full bull shit my dear.
Other than F-35 Project, LM have most of the time delivered.
Right??
The F35 already delivered are not war ready according to some USAF top brass.