I am not in disagreement with you. I was just laughing at what LM touted in the past about how even one loose rivet could increase the RCS of F-117 and now both F-35 & F-22 are supposed to be "stealthy" despite carrying external ordnance/IRST pods. The fact that we're supposed to believe that due to stealthy pylons/weapons/pods Stealth wouldn't be compromised is sheer BS.@Rajput Lion
It's very difficult to cover 1,000km out from ships with patrols. As the radius increases, the area you need to cover increases in proportion to radius squared. The F-14 with extrenal tanks could only cover out to 450km for instance and the Phoenix increased that to 600km theoretically. You have to cover 4x the area at 900km as 450km. I don't believe there's currently any carrier-fighter combo that can cover out to 1,000km.
That's what French posters like @Picdelamirand-oil and @Bon Plan etc. have said over the years about versatility of Rafale to carry heavy stuff at a far distance.
F-35 in that configuration which you've posted won't be any better than Rafale.