In the case of Canada, Dassault (as AIrbus with EF2000) decided not to compete because unfair competition.....
and yet Saab entered and got quite far. surely the Rafale would have won being so superioer?
every time the Rafale doesn't win there is some excuse, and whenever it does win all the losses are convenently ignored. we have treaded this ground a hundred times already.
its pointless because you cannot even conceed any losses
It was the argument in Switzerland..... F-35 are so good that even only in simulators they are better than others ! (a big bull shit).
Except that the bill is not the one promised. 30 for the price of 36 plus some more money than intended when ordered.
Nice !!!
The Rafale lost. the Rafale lost to the F-35 in Switzerland. public knowledge vs French excuses.
you are still ignoring the initial controversy and cost overruns with your original bogus claim. The French people on this forum truly believe that people have no memories LOLSeems that :
They were very happy with Rafale during Sindoor,
They decided to purchase Rafale instead of SH18 despite its huge radar and best missiles (LOL).
Every day we are nearer a huge 114 Rafale indian order.
So.... missed !
watch:
Seems that :
"They" were very happy with F-35 in various combats
"They" decided to purchase F-35 instead of Rafale despite its huge radar and best missiles (LOL).
Every day we are nearer another 100+ F-35 annual production
So.... missed !
your argument suck and are easily reversed which make them essentially meaningless. the point stands, that not all Rafale have been delivered as you originally claimed. You can't retroactively change history. The French cohort on this thread Truly think Indians are the others here are simpletons who don't see through obvious attempts to white wash history.
if you want to argue that so long as they are happy the cost overruns and delays are nullified, then the F-35 fanboys can say the same thing. LOL