Niger Coup

BMD

Senior member
Dec 4, 2017
25,502
4,396

Niger's democratically elected President Mohamed Bazoum has been overthrown by the very people who were supposed to protect and uphold his office - the presidential guards who stood watch outside his palace.

President Bazoum was the first elected leader to succeed another in Niger since independence in 1960. Now his captors have suspended the country's constitution and installed Gen Abdourahmane Tchiani as head of state.

Niger is a key part of the African region known as the Sahel - a belt of land that stretches from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea. The area is plagued by jihadists and beset by military regimes.
 
(paste here, from "Africa, news & discussions")

(nyt, jul.29)

Coast to Coast, a Corridor of Coups Brings Turmoil in Africa

This past week’s military takeover in Niger completed a domino chain of countries ruled by leaders who seized power by force, fueling instability and presenting a conundrum for the United States.​

Africa’s coup belt spans the continent: a line of six countries crossing 3,500 miles, from coast to coast, that has become the longest corridor of military rule on Earth.​
This past week’s military takeover in the West African nation of Niger toppled the final domino in a band across the girth of Africa, from Guinea in the west to Sudan in the east, now controlled by juntas that came to power in a coup — all but one in the past two years.​
The last leader to fall was Niger’s Mohamed Bazoum, a democratically elected American ally who disappeared on Wednesday when his own guards detained him at the presidential palace in the capital, Niamey. His security chief now claims to be running the country.​
“We have decided to intervene,” Gen. Abdourahmane Tchiani, Niger’s new self-appointed ruler, said in a televised address on Friday.​
The coup instantly reverberated far beyond Niger, a sprawling and impoverished country in one of the world’s toughest neighborhoods. African leaders sounded the alarm over the latest blow to democracy on a continent where decades of hard-won advances are slipping away.​
“Africa has suffered a serious setback,” Kenya’s president, William Ruto, said on Friday.​
For the United States and its allies, the coup raised urgent questions about the fight against Islamist militants in the Sahel, the vast semiarid region where groups linked to Al Qaeda and the Islamic State are gaining ground at an alarming pace, moving from the desert toward the sea. Much of the Sahel overlaps with Africa’s newly formed, coast-to-coast coup belt.​
“I’m very worried that Sahelian Africa is going to melt down,” said Paul Collier, a professor of economics and public policy at Oxford’s Blavatnik School of Government.​
The Sahel has surpassed the Middle East and South Asia to become the global epicenter of jihadist violence, accounting for 43 percent of 6,701 deaths in 2022, up from 1 percent in 2007, according to the Global Terrorism Index, an annual study by the Institute for Economics and Peace.​

Understand the Military Coup in Niger​

A takeover. Military officers in the West African nation of Niger announced on July 26 that they had ousted the country’s president, throwing into uncertainty the future of one of the West’s few reliable partners in a region marred by coups and insecurity. Here is what to know:​
How did the coup unfold? Members of the country’s presidential guard encircled the president’s palace in Niamey, Niger’s capital, and detained Mohamed Bazoum, the country’s president. A group of army officials representing different branches of the military later declared on national television that they had “put an end to the regime” of Bazoum and a general was announced as the head of the transitional leadership.​
How have people in Niger reacted? Hundreds briefly demonstrated in the streets of Niamey to demand Bazoum’s release before being violently dispersed by security forces. The Nigerien government called on the public to reject the takeover, but the military officers who appeared on television said that it was necessary to avoid strife between branches of the country’s security forces.​
What could the events mean for Niger? A successful coup could further destabilize a poor country and nascent democracy. Bazoum became president in 2021, taking the reins in Niger’s first peaceful, democratic transition since it gained independence from France in 1960 and ending a period during which it experienced four military coups. The events could also affect dynamics in a region plagued by violent militants, poverty and coups.​
Until this past week, Niger was the cornerstone of the Pentagon’s regional strategy. At least 1,100 American troops are stationed in the country, where the U.S. military built drone bases in Niamey and the northern city of Agadez, one at a cost of $110 million. Now, all of that is in jeopardy.​
Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, speaking at a news conference in Australia, warned on Saturday that the United States could end its financial support and security cooperation for Niger if Mr. Bazoum were not reinstated as president. Though officials say the United States would be reluctant to go that far, Mr. Blinken was unequivocal.​
“The very significant assistance that we have in place — that is making a material difference in the lives of the people of Niger — is clearly in jeopardy,” he said. “And we’ve communicated that as clearly as we possibly can to those responsible for disrupting the constitutional order.”​
Any American withdrawal could open a door to Russia.​
The sight of Russian flags being waved by coup supporters in Niamey this past week echoed similar scenes after a coup in neighboring Burkina Faso last year. The flags do not mean the Kremlin was behind the coup, analysts say. But they do symbolize how Russia has positioned itself as the torch bearer of anti-Western, and especially anti-French, sentiment in a swath of Africa in recent years.​
President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia sought to exploit that gap at this past week’s Africa summit in St. Petersburg, where he proposed to liberate African countries from “colonialism and neocolonialism” — even as his country’s own Wagner mercenaries have exploited African gold and diamonds, and committed civilian atrocities.​
For Wagner’s mercurial boss, Yevgeny Prigozhin, the run of coups is a business opportunity. His forces already operate openly in Mali and Sudan in the coup belt, as well as in the nearby Central African Republic and Libya. Hovering on the margins of the St. Petersburg summit this past week, Mr. Prigozhin praised the coup in Niger, then proposed sending his own armed fighters to help.​
But if the coup belt has become a theater of geopolitical maneuvering, the coups themselves are rooted in an explosive mix of local factors, experts say.​
In Guinea, the coup leaders justified their actions by citing public anger at widespread corruption; in Mali and Burkina Faso, they claimed to have an answer to the tide of Islamist militancy plaguing their countries.​
In fact, insurgent violence has spread under the military juntas, accelerating the spiral of instability.​
In Burkina Faso, attacks once confined to the north of the country have come closer to the capital in recent months. In Mali, where the military replaced 5,000 French troops with about 1,000 Wagner mercenaries, civilian deaths have soared, according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, which tracks casualties.​
Everywhere, weak states are a factor. The Sahel has some of the world’s poorest countries and the highest birthrates (Niger, where an average woman has seven children, tops the list). Their soaring populations of frustrated, jobless young people swell the ranks of the insurgents.​
The youth bulge shows up among coup-makers, too. Most of the recent takeovers were led by men in their 30s or early 40s, on a continent where the average leader is in their 60s. Capt. Ibrahim Traoré, who was just 34 when he seized power in Burkina Faso last year, is the world’s youngest head of state.​
African countries have experienced 98 successful coups since 1952, a recent United Nations report on coups in Africa found. Jonathan Powell, an associate professor at the University of Central Florida, said the most coups had occurred in Sudan, where the latest takeover, in 2021, seeded an explosive military feud that recently grew into full-scale war.​
The takeovers dipped to their lowest level in the decade up to 2017, a period that included the Arab Spring and the ouster of longtime autocrats like Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak. Then the pendulum swung hard in the opposite direction.​
In Chad, seizing power is a family tradition. The country’s ruler, Mahamat Idriss Déby, took over in 2021 after his father, who had come to power in a 1990 coup, was killed in a battle.​
Niger seemed different.​
Despite a long history of coups, the desert-dominated nation of 25 million people seemed to be on a path to stability under Mr. Bazoum, who was elected president in 2021.​
He was making progress against the militants, appeared to enjoy the support of the armed forces and was celebrated by influential Westerners. Onstage with Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates at a talk last October, the smiling Mr. Bazoum was introduced as a “gender warrior” for promoting the education of girls and a reduction in the birthrate.​
But then a personal factor struck: tensions with the head of the presidential guard, General Tchiani, that seem to have initiated this past week’s mutiny, said Dr. Issaka K. Souaré, the author of a book on coups in West Africa.​
Sometimes, Dr. Souaré added, coups simply come like swallows.​
“There’s a contagion effect,” he said. “You see your colleagues in neighboring countries have toppled the civilians, and now the red carpet is rolled under your feet. You want the same.” /end
 
  • Like
Reactions: RASALGHUL and BMD
:ROFLMAO: as if they were shining stars today, why does west care what happens to them?
Even the country that backed the coup isn't a shining example of good economics. :ROFLMAO:

Better economies and more stability means less illegal immigration and less aid required, also has a knock-on affect on the global economy. And we're not big on Africa suffering anyway.
 
@jetray @randomradio In fact, further to my remark above, a stable and economically prosperous Africa isn't even in Russia's geopolitical interests when you think about it. It wants more illegal immigration to the EU to destabilise it and also wants to destabilise African regions to thwart any commodities trade with the EU. So it is in Russia's interests to turn Africa into a hellhole.
 
Give it 10 years and see if Mali, Niger etc. are any better off.

Niger is a sh!thole like Pakistan. If India was on its border, it would have been richer, with a far stronger military, and the US would protect it with dole outs while setting it up as a future patsy state.

Nothing will happen in 10 years, they need 30 years of consistent 5% growth just to get to where India is today, ie, still in poverty. And then 30 more years to actually become a developed country.

Mali's in the same boat.

Plus being Islamic societies already handicaps them by default, so they are doomed to mediocrity anyway.

The West should be doing more to protect these countries from commies though. No point in just complaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
@jetray @randomradio In fact, further to my remark above, a stable and economically prosperous Africa isn't even in Russia's geopolitical interests when you think about it. It wants more illegal immigration to the EU to destabilise it and also wants to destabilise African regions to thwart any commodities trade with the EU. So it is in Russia's interests to turn Africa into a hellhole.

The Russians don't have the means to do it even if they wanted to.

Neither the West nor Russians want a stable, prosperous Africa. It's why the Africans are getting closer to the Chinese, with India doing its utmost to stop that.

The Chinese and Indians want to develop Africa in order to tap its market.
 
Niger is a sh!thole like Pakistan. If India was on its border, it would have been richer, with a far stronger military, and the US would protect it with dole outs while setting it up as a future patsy state.

Nothing will happen in 10 years, they need 30 years of consistent 5% growth just to get to where India is today, ie, still in poverty. And then 30 more years to actually become a developed country.

Mali's in the same boat.

Plus being Islamic societies already handicaps them by default, so they are doomed to mediocrity anyway.

The West should be doing more to protect these countries from commies though. No point in just complaining.
You support the commies though. And funny how Poland needed less than 20 years in the EU to overtake Russia.

There'll be at least another 5 coups before they reach 30 years.
 
The Russians don't have the means to do it even if they wanted to.
Well it's Wagner PMC helping these coups, and Russian flags keep popping up afterwards.
Neither the West nor Russians want a stable, prosperous Africa. It's why the Africans are getting closer to the Chinese, with India doing its utmost to stop that.
Of course the West want a stable Africa. Alternative sources to Russian resources, gas pipelines etc. and we're happy to pay market price. This will bring jobs to Africa and reduce immigration to the EU and the need for aid. There's also the export market angle as it becomes richer. It's win-win.
The Chinese and Indians want to develop Africa in order to tap its market.
China is too far from Africa for it to have the same trading gravity. East Africa is probably more important to India for the same reason.
 
Of course the West want a stable Africa. Alternative sources to Russian resources, gas pipelines etc. and we're happy to pay market price. This will bring jobs to Africa and reduce immigration to the EU and the need for aid. There's also the export market angle as it becomes richer. It's win-win.
The most important thing is that most of Africa's resources do not benefit the majority of Africans, they only enrich the pockets of Western agents, in Chinese terms, comprador
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: D68 and RASALGHUL
Nothing will happen in 10 years, they need 30 years of consistent 5% growth just to get to where India is today, ie, still in poverty. And then 30 more years to actually become a developed country.

Mali's
Several major African countries, such as Nigeria, Angola and Ghana, have reached or surpassed India's GDP per head
Niger is a sh!thole like Pakistan. If India was on its border, it would have been richer, with a far stronger military, and the US would protect it with dole outs while setting it up as a future patsy state
During the military dictatorship, Niger's economy did well enough to feed itself and develop some industry, but after the so-called democratization, Niger has been carved up by Western agents and local bureaucrats
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shaktimaan and D68
Plus being Islamic societies already handicaps them by default, so they are doomed to mediocrity anyway.

The West should be doing more to protect these countries from commies though. No point in just complaining
In my opinion, Hinduism and Islam are no different , the fundamental reason for a strong country is to develop a strong manufacturing industry and solve the land problem so that farmers have land
 
Even the country that backed the coup isn't a shining example of good economics. :ROFLMAO:

Better economies and more stability means less illegal immigration and less aid required, also has a knock-on affect on the global economy. And we're not big on Africa suffering anyway.
I learned in my high school textbooks that the West uses Africa as a product dumping ground and a cheap source of resources. West Africa is usually the French sphere of influence. The pricing power of uranium mines in Niger has always been in the hands of the French
 
The most important thing is that most of Africa's resources do not benefit the majority of Africans, they only enrich the pockets of Western agents, in Chinese terms, comprador
That isn't the case though, they get paid for the oil and there are associated jobs. What they do with the money is their prerogative. If they have internal corruption, then they need to deal with that. A dictatorship is not the answer because they can be as corrupt as they like since they don't need votes to stay in power.

Let's let the facts speak for themselves though. Niger became democratic in 2011 with the transition in 2010-2011.


1691000799025.png



1691000970069.png
 
Last edited:
I learned in my high school textbooks that the West uses Africa as a product dumping ground and a cheap source of resources. West Africa is usually the French sphere of influence. The pricing power of uranium mines in Niger has always been in the hands of the French
Being Chinese, I'm sure you learnt a lot of things in your high school textbooks that are simply wrong.

The West certainly exploited Africa during the days of colonialism, many non-Western empires also exploited people*, but in recent decades it's been a fair exchange of goods and services and Niger's GDP/Capita PPP was rising stably.

*Slavery in China - Wikipedia
 
Being Chinese, I'm sure you learnt a lot of things in your high school textbooks that are simply wrong.

The West certainly exploited Africa during the days of colonialism, many non-Western empires also exploited people*, but in recent decades it's been a fair exchange of goods and services and Niger's GDP/Capita PPP was rising stably.

*Slavery in China - Wikipedia
You thought that when the so-called colonial era ended, exploitation ended, but in fact, exploitation turned into the era of economic globalization, France controlled the African economy, France seized the pricing power of Niger's uranium ore, and multinational companies controlled by French companies monopolized uranium mining in Niger. As a result, the economic growth you mentioned only represented the deepening of French exploitation in Niger. Because the increase in Niger's GDP is only an increase in the scale of uranium mining by the French, and the profits from mining go back to the French, and the so-called increase in the income of the population represents only an increase in the income of the bureaucrats who cooperate with the French
 
That isn't the case though, they get paid for the oil and there are associated jobs. What they do with the money is their prerogative. If they have internal corruption, then they need to deal with that. A dictatorship is not the answer because they can be as corrupt as they like since they don't need votes to stay in power.

Let's let the facts speak for themselves though. Niger became democratic in 2011 with the transition in 2010-2011.
In that case, it makes sense that Nigeriens chose to overthrow a pro-French government and not do business with the French,So why are the French threatening a military strike against Niger?In fact, democracy really came to Niger in 1990, when the Conche regime stepped down, and Niger's economy fell off a cliff, and during this period, the French re-entered Niger and plundered their resources, as you can see if you move this graph forward.