Off-Topic Chit-Chat

Those 'enlightened people' belong to your little island, so the point still stands. And given the prevalence of such opinions among Brits, it cannot be dismissed as an exception.

And it's simply not some random opinion. It's pure racism & indophobia.

And you are the one who posted some random YouTube comment of a colonial apologist about 'British empire civilizing the heathens'. So basically you too count among that enlightened population.

You reap what you sow. After colonizing us for more than a hundred years, celebrating colonialism and now spreading atrocity propaganda against us, you cannot expect us to be pro-British.

At the least we aren't harbouring terrorists who attack UK, much unlike perfidious Brits.
You don't really even know that for sure, it's the internet. Two is a prevalence.

There is actually any racism in those posts TBH. They deal with the issue of aid and make harsh criticisms about safety standards in India. You may not like those criticisms and they may or may not be true, but there is no racism there.

All empires furthered civilisation in ways. Difficult to accept, but ultimately true.

An Anglophobic opinion again. If you have actual evidence that someone living in the UK committed a terror attack in India or anywhere else, please forward the evidence to UK authorities.
 
'Supposedly free' press infiltrated by intelligence agencies & indulging in atrocity propaganda might be.

Now find a good excuse for why BBC didn't publish news of the rape & murder of a six year old child in their home page or social media.
The press has definitely been infiltrated but not by any government body. I imagine it was probably put in the geographic section it belongs to.
 
The way she darted forward on the final stretch is what I have never seen in 53yrs of my life. It was simply amazing. Going by her performance, I am sure she is very bright prospect for India in 200m, 400m & 800m events.

In general, sports is being encouraged of late, especially with the girls. When I was growing up, everyone wanted to wield a bat and be sachin.
 
You don't really even know that for sure, it's the internet. Two is a prevalence.

Anti- Indian sentiment among British netizens on every platform such as facebook, twitter, Reddit or any fora & indophobic bias of British media are good indicators

There is actually any racism in those posts TBH. They deal with the issue of aid and make harsh criticisms about safety standards in India. You may not like those criticisms and they may or may not be true, but there is no racism there.

Of course, now say they all may have Indian friends. That's how it usually works right?

The so called 'harsh criticism is nothing but a display of ignorance & pure racism'

It is nothing but pure racism... 'We are funding them, they should be rather left to rot' to 'Indians are an inferior race who must be ruled over'

You being an idiot & a colonial apologist would not find it racist. Just like how you don't find numerous massacres & famines during British rule in India condemnable.

All empires furthered civilisation in ways. Difficult to accept, but ultimately true.

British empire did further civilization in Britain, I don't doubt that.

An Anglophobic opinion again.

Truth hurts ?

If you have actual evidence that someone living in the UK committed a terror attack in India or anywhere else, please forward the evidence to UK authorities.

Already reported in 7/7 bombing coroner's report & your own media. Keep living in denial though.
 
Last edited:
The way she darted forward on the final stretch is what I have never seen in 53yrs of my life. It was simply amazing. Going by her performance, I am sure she is very bright prospect for India in 200m, 400m & 800m events.

I hope she remains focussed and does not get distracted by the overwhelming attention she is receiving now.
 
Anti- Indian sentiment among British netizens on every platform such as facebook, twitter, Reddit or any fora & indophobic bias of British media are good indicators
Probably because they find you annoying and who could blame them.


Of course, now say they all may have Indian friends. That's how it usually works right?
They probably do.

The so called 'harsh criticism is nothing but a display of ignorance & pure racism'

It is nothing but pure racism... 'We are funding them, they should be rather left to rot' to 'Indians are an inferior race who must be ruled over'

You being an idiot & a colonial apologist would not find it racist. Just like how you don't find numerous massacres & famines during British rule in India condemnable.
That's your opinion, they have different opinions. And there we numerous massacres and famines after British Rule. We've already been through the figures.

British empire did further civilization in Britain, I don't doubt that.
And in most other places too. South Africa, Nigeria and Kenya are the most advanced nations in Africa. North America speaks for itself, ditto Australia and New Zealand.


Truth hurts ?
It seems to hurt you a lot. Hence why you always bring up this trash.


Already reported in 7/7 bombing coroner's report & your own media. Keep living in denial though.
Security services prioritise suspects and monitor them. Sometimes, if they don't get enough to put the away, they re-prioritise surveillance. It'ss not a perfect science.
 
Plot B cannot oblige Plot A to share the expenses of a common boundary wall, but they can definitely build it themselves.

There is no 'right' or 'wrong' here, there is only legally required and therefore enforceable, or legally not required, therefore achievable only through mutual consent.

An unasked question is about the compensation that Plot A might demand for loss of property due to the collapse of the boundary wall built by Plot B. This is a difficult point. Plot A might argue that they had nothing to do with the wall-building, and they should not be punished by the collapse of the wall. Plot B might retort that these are two different matters; that it is open to Plot A to quantify the damages suffered purely due to the collapsing of their wall, excluding those portions that might reasonably be expected to have suffered wear and tear through aging. And they might invite Plot A to re-build the wall jointly.

Plot B need to compensate. They should have created a boundary with their limits so to contain the filling.
 
Ah, so now yoou're postiing links to BBC news stories.

It's surprisingly difficult to get rid of these people, Abu Hamza was doing something similar. The ECHR is very annoying that way.

Even the BBC had to cover it.

And what does allowing a Pakistani terrorist to give 'lectures' in your country have to do with ECHR you moron ?
 
Probably because they find you annoying and who could blame them.

This is all you could come up with ?

That's your opinion, they have different opinions.

So according to the same logic if an extremist Muslim thinks that blowing up infidels is perfectly kosher, it's just a different opinion. Don't make much noise about it.

Security services prioritise suspects and monitor them. Sometimes, if they don't get enough to put the away, they re-prioritise surveillance. It'ss not a perfect science.

Keep making one excuse after another. It doesn't bother me as I am happy that karma finally caught up with your country.

Those who sheltered anti-India terrorists were bombed by the same terrorists.

And there we numerous massacres and famines after British Rule.

Already debunked BS. Try better.

North America speaks for itself, ditto Australia and New Zealand.

Where the Brits could kill off the natives en masse & establish their dominance. Thank God this didn't happen in India.
 
BBC takes anti- India propaganda to a whole new level...

IMG_20180801_201654.jpg


Expelling illegal immigrants from Bangladesh is 'witch hunt' against ethnic minorities...

While this is perfectly kosher...

Theresa May vows her 'hostile environment' on illegal immigration will continue, despite the Windrush scandal

What's wrong with deportation targets anyway ?

Theresa May Confirms Home Office Had Deportation Targets When She Was Home Secretary

In Teresa May's own words...

"The aim is to create, here in Britain, a really hostile environment for illegal immigrants"

Also...

“When immigration is too high, when the pace of change is too fast, it’s impossible to build a cohesive society.”

This is not a witch hunt btw... (well we are no one to judge the most morally righteous race of people)

tory-van-620_2628143b.jpg
 
Look on the bright side, if you were the member of a local EU equivalent, you would have to keep them.

It seems Thailand also reported on this.

India strips 4 million of citizenship

I guess it boils down to whether they actually had citizenship or not. If not, then the title is incorrect. If so, then that's a bit different from deporting illegals. Windrush was indeed similar but those people never actually got deported in the end. It was Labour's fault for destroying their ability to prove they were Windrush migrants (boarding cards).

Anyway, I don't know and I don't care but you spread the word of the BBC so widely that they should be paying you.
 
Last edited:
I guess it boils down to whether they actually had citizenship or not. If not, then the title is incorrect.

It's definitely not about any issue of citizenship. It's about portraying an action taken against illegal immigrants as a 'witch-hunt against ethnic minorities'.

This is nothing but a pure hit-job against India & clearly shows the double standards of the British.


Anyway, I don't know and I don't care but you spread the word of the BBC so widely that they should be paying you.

No one would have heard about this if I hadn't posted this here. Very intelligent, Padraig. :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sathya