Very nice, was the SU-30 mki which flew today the first of the 12 ordered in 2024, or was it an already operational aircraft in the IAF ?
Very nice, was the SU-30 mki which flew today the first of the 12 ordered in 2024, or was it an already operational aircraft in the IAF ?

Looks like it
Looks like it
Do you believe me nowI didn't believe particularly this point when he told upgrading to composite air frame . Rest I agreed.

Looks like the IAF is taking inspiration from the F-15 Silent Eagle concept. I'd also suggest a chined radome similar to Su-34 to reduce frontal RCS.Do you believe me now![]()
We integrated BrahMos-A without their certfication. Replacing Al panel with same weight Composite panel aint that difficult for us. Plus it was also part of the original contract to slowly replace all metal panels with composite ones.Ram panel can also mean RAM applied panel. Can HAL replace the aeroframe material without certifying it with Rus for Su30 only?

Some foolish clowns write clickbait fiction, and other clowns celebrate it. Common sense has become so rare.MKI splashed F-35Bs in the recent exercise surprising the Brits. I always have said that MKI can fight(defeat) 5th-gen fighters and now my point has been vindicated.
Just curious, do 5G jets carry Luneberg lens when flying sorties in international exercises? To what extent does it mask their true signature?@randomradio, @vstol Jockey
MKI splashed F-35Bs in the recent exercise surprising the Brits. I always have said that MKI can fight(defeat) 5th-gen fighters and now my point has been vindicated.
We integrated BrahMos-A without their certfication. Replacing Al panel with same weight Composite panel aint that difficult for us. Plus it was also part of the original contract to slowly replace all metal panels with composite ones.
PS: Any guesses what it was? CFC like Tejas or C N T like F-35![]()
Yes.Just curious, do 5G jets carry Luneberg lens when flying sorties in international exercises?
Basically drowns out original signature.To what extent does it mask their true signature?
I mean its obvious MKI would smoke F35 in WVR due to superior aerodynamics and such.Yes.
Basically drowns out original signature.
In the exercise.
Su30mki, jags and our awacs, simulated an anti ship attack on QE carrier group.
British f35b with lunerberg lens were protecting the carrier group.
After that exercise.
A wvr and dogfight exercise took place between British and our jets.
While it can locked onto and missile fired at it at those distances.I mean its obvious MKI would smoke F35 in WVR due to superior aerodynamics and such.
But reality is far far different and irl Sukhoi would be shot down like 150-200 km away before it would even realize F35 was present.
At which distance would incoming BVR from F35 give so little warning that Sukhoi would be smoked? The sukhoi with bars I mean cuz obviously it would be different for super Sukhoi with more advanced MAWS and stuff.While it can locked onto and missile fired at it at those distances.
But chances of it being shot down by a bvr fired at those distances are low.
High chance of it being forced to abandon mission tho and take evasive actions.
Chances of hitting a modern(non stealth) fighter jet at more than ~100km distances even if you have missiles with max ranges of 200+km, i would categories it in low probability.At which distance would incoming BVR from F35 give so little warning that Sukhoi would be smoked? The sukhoi with bars I mean cuz obviously it would be different for super Sukhoi with more advanced MAWS and stuff.
Yes, they mostly do deploy Luneberg Lens. However, if IAF requested RN to unleash F-35Bs in their full stealth profile against MKIs then it is not out of realms for them to oblige.Just curious, do 5G jets carry Luneberg lens when flying sorties in international exercises? To what extent does it mask their true signature?
Yeah no.Yes, they mostly do deploy Luneberg Lens. However, if IAF requested RN to unleash F-35Bs in their full stealth profile against MKIs then it is not out of realms for them to oblige.