Twin-Engine Deck Based Fighter (TEDBF)
- Thread starter Gautam
- Start date
Assuming that the first squadron of TEDBF will be operational from 2032-2033, would it be a good option for IN to induct ~24 twin seat NLCA to make up sufficient aircraft numbers to operate from 2 aircraft carriers, and relegate these to training roles when the TEDBF becomes operational?
More like 8-10 or so NLCA because there won't be twin seat TEDBF. Thus it can be used to train carrier landing.
There is no plans to buy more. According to navy chief the tender is scrapped and TEDBF is to replace Mig-29K and for next carrier requirements. (The interview video is posted in this thread)
Don't mind the noise from various corners.
An update: Multi-Role Carrier Borne Fighter For The Indian Navy - Updates & Discussions
Last edited:
That's what I said in the other thread. If TEDBF is designed in such a way that with minimal changes the same aircraft can be made operational from a CATOBAR design. That solves major problems.
TEDBF: The Future of Indian Naval Aviation
“Whoever rules the waves, rules the world”, these famous words by the renowned US Navy flag officer, geo-strategist, and naval historian Alfred T. Mahan, highlight the importance of nav…
airpowerasia.com
TEDBF: The Future of Indian Naval Aviation
“Whoever rules the waves, rules the world”, these famous words by the renowned US Navy flag officer, geo-strategist, and naval historian Alfred T. Mahan, highlight the importance of nav…
So we have chosen the Super Rafale design.
In that article nothing is said about EW systems, except some generic terms. Not sure how well it can outperform rafale in EW arena.
for 26ton class 2x98KN is fine.
I feel the envisioned 125 kn engine is for AMCA design with flat nozzle, to compensate the thrust reduction due to that design.
Just a speculation.