Ukraine - Russia Conflict
- Thread starter randomradio
- Start date
Well Margarita would like a war with NATO.
Yeah, 1 death and 5 injuries needed >10 ambulances. Funny how maths works in Russia. A bit like how only 10k Russian troops have been killed but they need to keep mobilising hundreds of thousands.
Quel chance?
Yeah, 1 death and 5 injuries needed >10 ambulances. Funny how maths works in Russia. A bit like how only 10k Russian troops have been killed but they need to keep mobilising hundreds of thousands.
Quite simply, the Russians defended the first line by compensating for losses by calling on second and third line units, so that when the first line was breached there was no one left to defend the other lines.
Those are going to be battlefield ATACMS since they are cluster ATACMS. Two cluster ATACMS can devastate a huge area of trenched in vadniks.
No, ISW clarified it. They simply divided the main line into three lines and then claimed they breached the 3rd line of the main line. Semantics.
The only problem is it's in the opposite direction as Tokmak. A lot of the Ukrainian push is happening away from Tokmak, which the Russians are fine with.
There are many more lines after the main line.
It's pointless. The idea behind ATACMS is high explosives, so they can get to command nodes and underground ammo dumps. Cluster munitions are merely battlefield weapons meant to kill soldiers, it won't change anything.
This is very bad news.
I've been arguing this point for many years now.
So tax revenues will be up 22%, energy earnings will be up 25%, and deficit will only be 0.9% of GDP.
And with their defence budget at 11T rubles, they will soon be much bigger than NATO.
The West is friggin' retarded.
I've been arguing this point for many years now.
So tax revenues will be up 22%, energy earnings will be up 25%, and deficit will only be 0.9% of GDP.
And with their defence budget at 11T rubles, they will soon be much bigger than NATO.
The West is friggin' retarded.
Turns out ISW is actually referring to the anti-tank ditch as the third line. All the UAF has done is cross one such ditch in one area.
Do we have any ATCAMS equivalent program? I think pralay more like a ballistic missile than a field weapon, and prahar is not having enough pay load capacity to call atcam equivalent.
No. And in any case, the S-400 has been praised. It's better than expected.
Prahaar is in fact superior to the ATACMS, it has the same payload, but it's faster and has a shorter altitude, has better terminal agility, and comes with an active seeker. It's basically a next generation version of ATACMS. The launcher truck also carries 6 of them compared to just 1 or 2 ATACMS. There's really no comparison. Its only disadvantage is its shorter range, but we don't have a need for more range from this class. 200Km is enough for the IA.
The Americans are soon gonna introduce a replacement for ATACMS called PrSM, which is as sleek as the Prahaar and as short as ATACMS but has a lot more range and speed. The standard version will do 650 km, the ramjet version will do 1000.
Its not russian defence spending that will matter but countries like iran & nk getting advanced tech that will see more fire works. Bet drones will become one of the wonder weapons to fight an asymmetric war. With advanced weapons to defend they will more emboldened to take the battle to new areas. We will see proxy wars in coming days.
