yeah artificial cntries like US, canada, australia are principled cntries built on mass genocide of native ppl are highly principled and they are qualified to judge others.Ukraine - Russia Conflict
- Thread starter randomradio
- Start date
yeah artificial cntries like US, canada, australia are principled cntries built on mass genocide of native ppl are highly principled and they are qualified to judge others.
An ongoing genocide occurring right now is all fine and dandy because other genocides have occurred in the past. Got it.
Whereas India complains about imperialism for 75 years and then supports it. Not hypocritical at all. It's the same with many SE Asian and African people, they're happy about colonialism except when it affects them. The real irony is that the reason there's anti-western sentiment and pro-Russian sentiment in parts of Africa and Asia is because the West exited its colonies and gave them back independence whereas Russia just kept most of their colonies throughout Eastern Europe, central and NE Asia and steps on the head of anyone with a negative opinion of them there. In Russia and China you get the false history of Stalin and Mao as nice guys. Gorbachev likely destroyed the USSR because Stalin arrested and tortured his grandparents, go fact check that and tell me I'm wrong.
Your foreign minister is a grade A Type-R c*nt. Since when is defending a free country with a fairly elected government not principled. He has no principles.
Most historical western genocides pale in comparison to the average Indian riot. Russia invaded North America at the same time as the US was founded, having already genocided their way from Eastern Europe to Eastern Asia. Go fact check that. They did everything western colonialism did during that time and worse, except they continued doing it after WWII AND are still doing it today.
You can talk about Iraq and Libya but neither of those two countries were annexed and no attempt was made to do so. A mass murdering dictator was removed in both cases and an attempt a forming a democracy was made in both cases. Russia, on the otherhand props up Assad and other dictators in Africa (Mali, Burkino Fasa, Niger etc.) and South America (Nicaragua, Cuba, Venezuela).
Like I said, your FM is a grade A c*nt for attempting to spin it any other way.
Last edited:
RusNews ⭕️
Беспилотники утром атаковали город Энгельс в Саратовской области Утром в Саратовской области прогремели мощные взрывы над городом Энгельс, перед взрывами жители слышали звук мотора в небе. Жители Энгельса сообщили, что слышали над городом сирену ракетной опасности и от 2 до 4 звуков взрывов...
t.me
Russia trying to stop people leaving into liberated Russian territory.
It doesn't matter what the motive was, the West still went into another country, destabilized and killed the people there and handed over the country to others.
What if hypothetically France is invaded by the US and they then hand over France to Germany or Poland? I bet the US is absolved of all guilt then?
All of you are wrong. Iraq was also a genocidal expansion. The US simply ended up handing the country over to Iran instead of staying there.
I don't see any difference in all these wars. From not just India's but pretty much the entire Global South's perspective, it's just powerful countries dealing with weaker countries using violence. To us, there's no difference between Iraq and Libya and Ukraine. Just another day at the school.
Why are you worried? 'Cause after a very long time, one of "your" countries is in the crosshairs.
That's pretty much how it goes. "If you are in trouble, we don't care. But if we are even slightly inconvenienced, you should care."
Footage of an inspection inside an American-made Ukrainian M1A1SA Abrams tank. The tank had previously been hit or hit a mine in the Avdeevsky direction, this is the outskirts of Berdychi, after which the crew abandoned it. These tanks were received by the 47th separate mechanized brigade "Magura". The M1A1SA Abrams tank is a modification of the eighties, improved to meet the requirements for tanks of the late nineties. In terms of equipment and capabilities, the M1A1SA tank is similar to tanks of the next modification M1A2 of the early series.
The motive absolutely matter because it dictates the means used to occupy as well as what happens on occupied territory.
This is the silliest take you could have on it. Handing Iraq to Iran was never the intent. It was just an unforeseen consequence of America's bungling.
Unforeseen by America, that is. Other countries in The West™ did warn them going into Iraq was a stupid idea and refused to join in, something that you seem to forget due to your love of treating The West™ as a monolithic entity.
Regardless, there was no genocidal campaign in Iraq. People were not arrested, tortured, and executed because of their ethnicity or language. This is exactly what is happening right now in the areas of Ukraine occupied by Russian forces.
Incorrect. The motive was faked. All these wars came with fake public motives. All these wars are all pretty much the same.
The US entered the war without thinking they will bungle it. Why are you relying on hindsight? The motives, as you are interested in, is the exact same as what Russia wants out of Ukraine. If Iraq had white Christians, the US would have stayed.
Western world - Wikipedia
Since the fall of the iron curtain the following countries are generally accepted as the Western world:[200] the United States, Canada; the countries of the European Union plus the UK, Norway, Iceland and Switzerland; Australia and New Zealand.
Your people created this term in your arrogance, not me.
So English-speaking and/or part of the EU. Politically, we can extend this courtesy to staunch allies of "the West," like Japan, SoKo etc.
Er... All that happened in Iraq. And it's currently happening in Libya. There are two ways to do this, you either do this yourself or create the conditions necessary for others to do it for you, while under your protection.
You are living under a rock.
You were arguing about Russia decimating everything in their path in Ukraine. The same is happening in Gaza. So war is pretty much the same everywhere, no matter how advanced the weapons used.
I'd actually argue the war in Ukraine is a whole lot cleaner than what happened in Iraq or Libya. Or even Syria. These wars were far more devastating than Ukraine.
Nobody cares abt wests virtue signaling, they have been biggest perpetrators of crime against humanity. There is no genocide happening in ukraine only western propaganda, sore losers talk abt genocide when they start losing. On the contrary nazi -west was now where seen when ukraine was committing genocide when it was shelling russian speaking areas.
they create 5 eyes, exclusive clubs, military expeditions to areas they have no connection, arbitrary sanction clubs. Every where they form a cabal representing european and their descendants around the world, then the boys claim they are unfairly framed.
And even your riots pale in insignificance next to your post-war malnutrition deaths. If Britain had been governing you still, you'd have claimed they were genocides too.
