Ukraine - Russia Conflict

If you calculate the per capita grain output, it will be 223KG, (2020)
Data from the World Food and Agriculture Organization
Seems you have severe problem understanding , why dont you go back read the post again. As I said these are estimates and has nothing to do with reality, there are zero facts involved here. Most of the grain output from Indian farmers are not recorded as they are into subsistence agriculture bcos of small land holdings. In most of the states grain given by govt ends up getting into cattle feed but none of the smart alec reports this but they are busy picking up some random case of starvation and then extrapolating that for their own devious purpose.


Its like me watching a english porn movie and then coming to a conclusion that all the ppl in the west are busy f*** each other all the time. 🤣
 
Bin Laden is dead, that was the only true objective, the rest was unrealistic mission creep.
for 20 long years ? 🤣 I suppose they stayed back to smoke some strong weed.
They killed 60,000 of them, 20 for every coalition life loss, even with truly ridiculous ROEs. If they were operating under the same ROEs as the Soviets they'd have killed a lot more. Fly-squatting becomes tedious after a while.
Most of the killed were not in fire fights but in drone and air strikes. They were mostly non-combatants, for example on the last days of withdrawal a drone strike killed a bunch of children nothing to feel proud of. If the kill ratio was 20:1 then taliban must have been wiped out by now but they have come back stronger.

seems your thinking ability has significantly degraded you need to take rest before you end up losing it altogether. 🤣
 
for 20 long years ? 🤣 I suppose they stayed back to smoke some strong weed.

Most of the killed were not in fire fights but in drone and air strikes. They were mostly non-combatants, for example on the last days of withdrawal a drone strike killed a bunch of children nothing to feel proud of. If the kill ratio was 20:1 then taliban must have been wiped out by now but they have come back stronger.

seems your thinking ability has significantly degraded you need to take rest before you end up losing it altogether. 🤣
They may as well have. You can't make Afghanistan into a country, no way no how. Lot of wasted money and time.

Most of the coalition deaths were in suicide bombings, not fire fights. No, 60,000 were combatants, and those children were the offspring of a terrorist, they would only have grown up to be terrorists too. Only 60,000 Taliban? Give me a break. :ROFLMAO:

Not really, Afghanistan was all asymmetric warfare, the symmetric warfare lasted only weeks. Russia has been getting its ars kicked in symmetrical warfare for over 5 months, with no end in sight.
 
Seems you have severe problem understanding , why dont you go back read the post again. As I said these are estimates and has nothing to do with reality, there are zero facts involved here. Most of the grain output from Indian farmers are not recorded as they are into subsistence agriculture bcos of small land holdings. In most of the states grain given by govt ends up getting into cattle feed but none of the smart alec reports this but they are busy picking up some random case of starvation and then extrapolating that for their own devious purpose.


Its like me watching a english porn movie and then coming to a conclusion that all the ppl in the west are busy f*** each other all the time. 🤣
This is not the case. Modern use of remote sensing satellites can roughly estimate the level of food production in a country based on the growth status of a country’s crops, diseases and insect pests.
Or by way of sample survey, statistics
Cattle feed is usually soybean and corn. Of course, Indian broken rice has been gradually imported as feed by many countries in recent years, such as China, Japan, South Korea
 
Modern use of remote sensing satellites can roughly estimate
did you read my post or do you have a comprehension problem? I have clearly stated that those are estimates not facts and why those estimates are not good enough as most of the landholdings are small. Remote sensing is great when the sampling quantity is large and evenly distributed.
 
Shows how accurate HiMARS is. No Russian "precision" rocket could ever do that. Also Ukraine has learned to hit a bridge with HiMARS attacking its width not its length.
There is no problem with accuracy. Since the 21st century, there have been more and more cheap satellite guidance modules and inertial guidance modules. Even North Korea and Iran can mass-produce ballistic missiles with CEP<5m. The reason why Russia has not played its due level, It can only be said that its military theory and military thinking are still in the Cold War period.
 
Yeah, actively involved in defending. That includes waiting at the Northern border just in case, and the upper Eastern border and Odessa just in case, and spy hunting, mine clearing in North, which is still being demined. Less than half that number are actively involved in the South and East, where the bulk of the fighting is, and a lot of them are operating artillery and artillery support/logistics. Some are in the Kherson region where Russia is having its ars kicked.

They have repelled several attacks around Bakhmut and Soledar. We know this because Russia tried to claim it was already in these two places, which it always does when trying to attack. The line has not moved in that area for at least 5 days. Meanwhile, Russian forces in Kherson just lost 1 of only two bridges feeding them. The Ukrainians will give them time to consider withdrawal and then they will remove the other one if they fail to do so and starve them into surrender.

Yeah, if you call 200 dead, 600 wounded and losing a key supply bridge in Kherson yesterday comfortable, then they're real comfortable. Russia has had a huge economic advantage over Europe since forever. It has 10 time more natural resources than it could ever use, and yet it has still failed to have a better GDP per capita than the EU, PPP or nominal, because its leadership is economically ineffective. Any chance of a decent Russia economy was destroyed in the early 1990s by former Soviet officials selling off state assets and companies to friends and family and themselves for cents on the dollar, turning it into an oligarchy.

Russia made a huge mistake starting this war. It had already taken Crimea and secured its Black Sea fleet, as well as part of the Donbass and Ukraine wasn't joining NATO anytime soon. Now they stand to lose everything because Ukraine will want to fully remove Russia from Ukraine for security reasons, they won't want to be surrounded on 3 sides by Russia ever again, so they will take Crimea by cutting off the Kerch bridge and blocking supplies ships with Harpoon, Exocet and ATACMS missiles, and Russia will remain fully sanctioned until they do.

Back in 2013/14 Russia could have just negotiated continued use of Sevastopol and access peacefully and likely would have got it for the sake of continued peace. If Russia did this instead of what they did, Russia's economy would be ~2.5x as large as it is now and it would not be sanctioned at all. It could then have pumped some of that that extra money into defence to cover its security needs, whilst maintaining relations with Europe. This is why Russia will never capitalise on its tremendous economic advantage, its leadership is completely fvcking stupid.

For pretty much everything you said here, the only answer is to wait and see it for yourself.

Back in 2013/14, the coup removed any chances of Russia fixing things with only negotiations. They didn't want war even until the last minute. Hell, they invaded thinking there won't even be a war. Why don't you look up the Minsk Agreements and decide for yourself if it was fair compared to this?
 
There is no problem with accuracy. Since the 21st century, there have been more and more cheap satellite guidance modules and inertial guidance modules. Even North Korea and Iran can mass-produce ballistic missiles with CEP<5m. The reason why Russia has not played its due level, It can only be said that its military theory and military thinking are still in the Cold War period.

The Russians have been using satellite-guided precision rockets in Ukraine.
 
The Russians have been using satellite-guided precision rockets in Ukraine.
I know, I have seen the wreckage of satellite-guided rockets a long time ago, but I am not talking about this. The biggest threat to Russia now is the modern artillery of the West, such as the Haymas and Kaiser artillery,
In Soviet military doctrine these were usually performed by assault aviation corps such as su-24, SU-34 and Il-28,
But in practice, because of the large cross-sectional area of the su-34 radar, it is easy to be detected by NATO long-range early warning aircraft. Once the NATO air and space early warning force finds that the Russian air and space are dispatched, it will notify the small number of mobile artillery of the Ukrainian army to retreat and transfer positions as soon as possible. This seriously restricted the effectiveness of the Russian military's strike.
With the retirement of all SU-24MRs in Russia, the front-line reconnaissance capabilities of the Aerospace Forces have declined seriously, which also limited the Russian military's reconnaissance capabilities for Ukrainian artillery.
If Russia has UAVs like Wing Loong-2 plus WZ-7, it can completely detect and destroy Ukrainian artillery, instead of begging for UAVs like Iran is now