Ukraine - Russia Conflict

When you have a border issue with China, we'll just tell you to buy more oil from Russia.
Are you trying to issue a threat? India does not bow down to any threat or compulsion. We abide by the laws/opinion of multi-polar world.

And what makes you think that India can't deal with China on its own?
 
Are you trying to issue a threat? India does not bow down to any threat or compulsion. We abide by the laws/opinion of multi-polar world.
Clearly you don't, since the UN ruled Russia's invasion illegal by a huge majority. We'll tell you the same thing when it's your turn. :)
And what makes you think that India can't deal with China on its own?
Common sense. India's indigenous defence technology capability is similar to Iran's, possibly not even as good in some areas.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RASALGHUL
Yeah, that's why Russia is in recession.


Not just Russia.

Congrats.

View attachment 28210

Fact. Decoys, hunter-killer decoys, plus jamming, ARMs and stealth.

Russia's IADS has failed. Lugansk, Mariupol, Berdyansk and 2 targets in Crimea inside half a week.

Fact, they've been dying in large numbers ever since they entered Ukraine.

:ROFLMAO:

Not really. There's a lot more in Asia than just India. Some mountain top on India's borders will mean very little to Europe after this.

NATO begs to differ.

Biggest funder of murder in the world.

We don't fund the West. We have a trade surplus.
 
Not just Russia.

Congrats.
Wow, a whole 0.1%, tell me how that compares to Russia? :ROFLMAO:
Facts, Storm Shadow has been hitting targets left, right and centre, whereas Kh-101s/Kalibrs hardly ever make it to target these days. Against NATO, Russian air defences would simply have too many targets, such that even if every Russian missile hits a decoy or ARM, there'll still be more coming, and then the production facilities that produce the missiles will be taken out by cruise missiles too.
NATO begs to differ.
Taiwan matters as an ally and major chip producer. A mountain top between two antagonistic rivals does not.
We don't fund the West. We have a trade surplus.
You fund Russia, go look at how many conflicts Russia and Wagner are involved in across the world right now. Wagner will soon be brought under the Russian government as per new bill, so there'll be no denying Russia's involvement in Wagner.

 
Last edited:
@BMD, If I was a General in NATO, I will be shit scared today. The way Russians are blowing up Leopards in Ukraine and the top most weapons of NATO countries is an eye opener. leopard is considered the best tank in Europe and far more superior to T-90 and at par with Challenger and Abrahm. But look at the way Russians are blowing them up and opening them like tin cans. Russians are now producing 500 T-90s every year. Guess what will happen if this war spills over to rest of Europe?

Russia is pulling the EU into an arms race they cannot afford.

Cold War era growth is gone. And now even raising debt is a struggle.
 
Russian air defences working well again.

1686491204868.png


 
Last edited:
The map is fine. The Ukrainians are announcing the capture of settlements themselves, and they are very far from the first line of defence. Really, really far.
Is that your new excuse? The areas were Russian-controlled, they got kicked out, and they got kicked out in as many days as it took them months to capture them in the first place.

Russia's sand castles are a last line of rear defence, once that's gone, they're f'ed completely.

Russia is pulling the EU into an arms race they cannot afford.

Cold War era growth is gone. And now even raising debt is a struggle.
So Russia's GDP falls 10%, it's involved in a costly and unwinnable war, but the EU can't match it in an arms race? How's the weather up your ar5e? :ROFLMAO:

Fires and train derailments are sure to help Russia win the arms race.:ROFLMAO:

1686491050387.png
 
Last edited:
Russian channel reporting this

Screenshot_20230611_142543_Telegram.jpg
IMG_20230611_142550_549.jpg




Also same source reporting kamikaze vessel ( 6 in number ) attack by Ukraine 300km south of Sevastopol . It was unsuccessful attempt as per Russia ministry of defence .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
Wow, a whole 0.1%, tell me how that compares to Russia? :ROFLMAO:

Facts, Storm Shadow has been hitting targets left, right and centre, whereas Kh-101s/Kalibrs hardly ever make it to target these days. Against NATO, Russian air defences would simply have too many targets, such that even if every Russian missile hits a decoy or ARM, there'll still be more coming, and then the production facilities that produce the missiles will be taken out by cruise missiles too.

You are free to believe that. It's your right as sheeple. So how many S-400 batteries been taken out to date?

Taiwan matters as an ally and major chip producer. A mountain top between two antagonistic rivals does not.

NATO would still beg to differ.


You fund Russia, go look at how many conflicts Russia and Wagner are involved in across the world right now. Wagner will soon be brought under the Russian government as per new bill, so there'll be no denying Russia's involvement in Wagner.

What on earth are you talking about? All their money is stuck in Indian banks. And we are asking them to reinvest it into our economy.

It's the UK and EU that have funded the Russian economy over the last 50 years. And while knowing the Russians were involved in global conflicts all these decades. So don't pin this on us, it's all your fault.
 
You are free to believe that. It's your right as sheeple. So how many S-400 batteries been taken out to date?
Lots. And Ukraine only has a few very old SEAD missiles. Isn't the S-400 supposed to stop things like this?:ROFLMAO:


NATO would still beg to differ.

They only offer things that they know you'll reject. NATO membership requires all 31 members to agree. You seriously think every NATO member would vote to go and defend a country whose media continually slags them off? What world do you even live in? :ROFLMAO:

What on earth are you talking about? All their money is stuck in Indian banks. And we are asking them to reinvest it into our economy.
Not all of it.

It's the UK and EU that have funded the Russian economy over the last 50 years. And while knowing the Russians were involved in global conflicts all these decades. So don't pin this on us, it's all your fault.
50 years? The EU tried to have a constructive trading relationship with Russia, which was admittedly a mistake, India is laundering their oil during an illegal annexation though, quite different.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: jetray
Clearly you don't, since the UN ruled Russia's invasion illegal by a huge majority. We'll tell you the same thing when it's your turn. :)
Man, the butthurt is running deep here:ROFLMAO:
Common sense. India's indigenous defence technology capability is similar to Iran's, possibly not even as good in some areas.
Far from reality. Iran is trying to make its first nuclear bomb while India is sitting on pile of thermonuclear ICBMs that can incinerate China at will. Try hard.
 
Man, the butthurt is running deep here:ROFLMAO:
Well, why not. We'll just say, "well you should have peace talks, we're neutral, got to look after our interests, blah blah." We'll probably stop short of our media actually vocally promoting the annexation, because we're not complete assholes.
Far from reality. Iran is trying to make its first nuclear bomb while India is sitting on pile of thermonuclear ICBMs that can incinerate China at will. Try hard.
Nuclear tech has many other political factors involved rather than just technical. Japan has no nukes, but is well ahead of India on technology for instance. Ditto for ROK. India is an oddity in having nukes but no domestically produced fighters.
 
Well, why not. We'll just say, "well you should have peace talks, we're neutral, got to look after our interests, blah blah." We'll probably stop short of our media actually vocally promoting the annexation, because we're not complete assholes.
Unlike you, Indians will respect your decision and not try to play the victim game by preaching on Euro forums;)
Nuclear tech has many other political factors involved rather than just technical. Japan has no nukes, but is well ahead of India on technology for instance. Ditto for ROK. India is an oddity in having nukes but no domestically produced fighters.
Tejas? And Indian domestic MIC is just coming into own. Talking about technology? Does Iran have anything like ISRO? Once again, try hard.
 
Unlike you, Indians will respect your decision and not try to play the victim game by preaching on Euro forums;)
What are you talking about? :ROFLMAO: You guys never stop playing the victim card. European colonialists... Britshits.... You owe us $X quadrillions... blah blah blah...:ROFLMAO:
Tejas? And Indian domestic MIC is just coming into own. Talking about technology? Does Iran have anything like ISRO? Once again, try hard.
Tejas is a training aircraft at best. Iran have better indigenous long range conventional guided missiles, indigenous air defences, and long range drones IMO.