It is most probably for Air to Air mode.This may pave the way for an air-launched SM-6 Blk IB AGM.![]()
It is most probably for Air to Air mode.This may pave the way for an air-launched SM-6 Blk IB AGM.![]()
SM-6s are all dual mode. The IB is just a larger 21 inch diameter, rather than 13.5 inch.It is most probably for Air to Air mode.
As it not with a booster then can't we say it is SM-2 Block IIIC and not the SM-6?![]()
AIM-174 Super Hornet-Launched Variant Of SM-6 Missile Breaks Cover In Hawaii (Updated)
After years in the shadows, what is likely the longest-range air-to-air missile ever fielded by the Navy comes into full view. After years in the shadows, what is likely the longest-range air-to-air missile ever fielded by the Navy comes into full view.www.twz.com
Nope, they are not the same, the lengths are different - 4.72m vs 4.85m. Weights slightly different too.As it not with a booster then can't we say it is SM-2 Block IIIC and not the SM-6?
Seems USN has been keeping it a hush about having SM-6 air to air capability classifying it SOP.Woah, it's operational already, that was quick.
![]()
U.S. Navy Confirms SM-6 Air Launched Configuration is 'Operationally Deployed'
The SM-6 Air Launched Configuration (ALC), known by its official designation as the AIM-174, is the longest range air-to-air missile ever fielded by the U.S. Navy.www.navalnews.com
The F-18s and F-18SHs got GaN radar recently, so that's a possibility too, as is off-board sensors (drones) and the space-based tracking layer's 'FOO-Fighters'.Seems USN has been keeping it a hush about having SM-6 air to air capability classifying it SOP.
A 200+ mile range means E-2D/E-3 guidance or F-35 flying over or near AO.
I'm imagining if USN went with F-14 -21 instead of F-18E that F-14 would likely be able to carry 4 SM-6 under fuselage alone and use its own radar to take advantage of SM-6s extreme range sine F-14 would have the biggest and most powerful aesa antenna on a fighter... 3-4k t/r modules.The F-18s and F-18SHs got GaN radar recently, so that's a possibility too, as is off-board sensors (drones) and the space-based tracking layer's 'FOO-Fighters'.
![]()
Space Force wants 'Foo Fighter' satellites to track hypersonic missiles
The program shares its name with the infamous UFOs that plagued Allied aviators during World War Two.www.space.com
True but GaN is 8-16x more powerful than GaAs, which can up to double range. Who doesn't like the idea of a stealth Tomcat though.I'm imagining if USN went with F-14 -21 instead of F-18E that F-14 would likely be able to carry 4 SM-6 under fuselage alone and use its own radar to take advantage of SM-6s extreme range sine F-14 would have the biggest and most powerful aesa antenna on a fighter... 3-4k t/r modules.
View attachment 34578
I think all that clutter/ir sensors in front would be gone and have a type of EOTS or EOTS allowing the missiles to be a bit forward... powered by two F-35 engines having 100klbs of thrust she'd be a beast. Oh what could have been.
Blk 2 Hornets don't have GaN and GaN F-18's are not flying anymore... I think.True but GaN is 8-16x more powerful than GaAs, which can up to double range. Who doesn't like the idea of a stealth Tomcat though.
View attachment 34585
The differences:As it not with a booster then can't we say it is SM-2 Block IIIC and not the SM-6?
Through this program, Anduril will demonstrate a high-performance, 21-inch diameter second stage rocket motor for an SM-6 variant for potential use in fleet area air defense against advanced, fast-moving threats.