Any chance for further increase? This one is the finest artillery existing today.Yes, an additional 100 is pending. 300 in total at the minimum.
Any chance for further increase? This one is the finest artillery existing today.Yes, an additional 100 is pending. 300 in total at the minimum.
This is not a deal with russia but HAL. Its written on the document which is visible.This clubbing of deals has happened before. When the 2012 MKI contract for 42 was clubbed with Mi-17, people assumed the higher price was because it was a Super Sukhoi version with all new avionics. Some even assumed these are nuclear versions for the SFC, which later the IAF denied. Some even assumed it was cost gouging as people are claiming for this time as well. It was only sometime later that we got to know the deal included 151 Mi-17s.
During the visit of the Russian President Vladimir Putin to India in December2012, a contract for additional 42 Su-30MKIs was signed. According to onereport, the total cost of these 42 fighters is estimated to be around $4.3 billion,as these are expected to have better specifications. Rumour has it that theseadditional aircraft were specially configured for nuclear delivery and were to costless than those produced by HAL.
It was $4.5B. And almost $3B went into the Mi-17s.
This time there was a theory that these 12 were some sort of specialized EW aircraft, which is still possible in some ways. Some theorized that it's necessary for a new production line, which is what Ankit is referring to. But the IAF is not interested in more MKIs, due to oversupply, and it's still too early to invest for export.
63000 Cr is the size of the MLU program, not the contract size with Russia. This deal could have elements of whatever's needed from Russia for the MLU. We could assume half is for the MKIs and the other half for MLU. Perhaps a ToT deal for the spares and maintenance of MKIs that were not part of the initial contract. We did the same for the T-90 in 2019; $3.12B for 464 tanks and new technologies, but $1.2B of that was ToT. Or it pays for some new Russian technology they would like to keep secret; ie, specialized EW aircraft.
This is pretty common with deals with Russia. Even our leased SSNs show a different sticker price compared to its actual cost. The first one was less than $700M, the second sub was les than $1B. But the contract prices were $2.5B and $3B resply.
So this deal too is just history repeating itself.
Any chance for further increase? This one is the finest artillery existing today.
This is not a deal with russia but HAL. Its written on the document which is visible.
What does an old misreporting have to do with this deal? Assumptions don't make sense.
Tbh its not middle man, rather HAL would be making those from scratch. Huge difference, yes the materials many of the volume will be imported but what Govt wanted always is local production under ToT/licensing and part local sourcing only. This part is the policymakers will, HAL merely there to facilitate that.Yeah, since it's with HAL, the deal will be MKI-centric. This is a lot more similar to the T-90 deal. So either new tech or some additional ToT. But it also means HAL will sign whatever's necessary with Russia. MoD is merely introducing a middle man.
MKI's indigenization is currently at 57%. This deal is said to increase that to 67%. So makes sense that this deal comes with that additional 10%. And the IAF's goal is to sign all the deals necessary to bring as close to 100% as possible the MRO of all of their jets as per what they announced a few years ago.
Simply put, this deal is 12 MKIs plus something else.
Tbh its not middle man, rather HAL would be making those from scratch. Huge difference, yes the materials many of the volume will be imported but what Govt wanted always is local production under ToT/licensing and part local sourcing only. This part is the policymakers will, HAL merely there to facilitate that.
The latest batch will have indigenous content of ~62%, so far away from MLU target of near 80%.
Anyways, as I said earlier, re-opening the production line for 12 jets is simply asinine. Even the Americans didn't do it for F-22 because of cost escalations. So I hope we end up ordering 50-70 more, but of course, in UPG. configuration.
The latest batch will have indigenous content of ~62%, so far away from MLU target of near 80%.
Anyways, as I said earlier, re-opening the production line for 12 jets is simply asinine. Even the Americans didn't do it for F-22 because of cost escalations. So I hope we end up ordering 50-70 more, but of course, in UPG. configuration.
Yes, there could be additional content due to the additional localization. That doesn't mean it's part of MLU.Yeah, since it's with HAL, the deal will be MKI-centric. This is a lot more similar to the T-90 deal. So either new tech or some additional ToT. But it also means HAL will sign whatever's necessary with Russia. MoD is merely introducing a middle man.
MKI's indigenization is currently at 57%. This deal is said to increase that to 67%. So makes sense that this deal comes with that additional 10%. And the IAF's goal is to sign all the deals necessary to bring as close to 100% as possible the MRO of all of their jets as per what they announced a few years ago.
Simply put, this deal is 12 MKIs plus something else.