Even the stuxnet capability is for ground based radars that are not mobile like AEWCS and will be sub-200km. How do you jam a 400+km mobile GaN radar?
I still don't completely buy the satellite targetting story.
Air Engagement of Operation Sindoor : Analysis
- Thread starter Parthu
- Start date
I still don't completely buy the satellite targetting story.
I'm not having any dream. I'm just quoting sweetie out here. As you would obviously know by now , sweetie's a very reliable source . Ja ? @Innominate
How do you even jam ground based AESA radars by the aerial route ? I've no clue but I know the Real McCoy when I see one. I'm a newly converted believer of whatever it is sweetie's evangelising for. Which is to say don't ask questions , just have faith & don't complain of wet feet when Moshe the lawgiver parts the Red Sea.
That article is here to debunk a french MP question about the rafale loss. Not having any information about the way this rafale was lost, he is asking question about Spectra efficiency.
The only question to respond is how many PL-15/HQ-9 were launch for that result. If all the AA stock has been used and have let the PAF without munition is it a good result ?
The only question to respond is how many PL-15/HQ-9 were launch for that result. If all the AA stock has been used and have let the PAF without munition is it a good result ?
The Indians have 8 PLs with varying degree of damage that are being examined. One is nearly intact. So that is indeed a valid question. It is vexing they did not disclose the nos. IAF needs to put out at least a little bit of data.
Unlike Rafale which has been proven to be all hype by frenchies with 3 Rafales claimed being shot down by pakee flown export J-10, with visual conformation of 1 Rafale, the F-35's stealth and EW can significantly reduce the range of an AEW&C ability to track it. I mean gee IAF used all 4th gen fighters against modern-ish IADS, AEW&C and fighters with advanced antennas and suffered losses, but some in here think the F-35 would have suffered the same outcome if used is borderline brain injury. Only Rafale fanboy would believe such cht.
So when F-16s are shot down over Ukraine, it's pilot fault but when Su-35S crashes it's proven to be shot down by an F-16? Ukraine has lost many F-16s supposedly shot down by Russian fighters. This is war where nothing is invincible.
Modern VHF radars are dialled to even track F-35As. F-35 is good enough to penetrate 3rd rate military powers but not against India or China or Russia. Against Pak, we could pound them into a state of oblivion from well within our border. So F-35 is not needed.
Where are the sources the SU-35's shot down F-16's? And is 3 Ukrainian F-16's lost considered many to you?
Uh-huh. Whatever helps with the sting of losing Rafales against pakee flown export J-10s.
I believe the chinese have stated these are the E - variant (export). Let's see what the DRDO has to say.
China’s most advanced air-to-air missile destined for export market
China has unveiled a version of its most powerful air-to-air missile designed for the export market at the Zhuhai air show.
www.scmp.com
We are talking about a GaN radar based AEWC with 450+km range. Even with f-35's stealth it will be detected in sub 200km.
FighterBomber has already denied that Su-35S was shot down by an F-16 rather by a Patriot SAM. End.
Go on and fight with China and see your multiple F-22s, F-18s, F-35s getting wrecked by PL-15s. That will sting harder
Anyways, whatever we lost, IAF came out with all guns blazing the next day and ruptured Pakistani air-defence and destroyed their multiple air-bases, nuke sites and multiple HVAs & fighter-jets on ground. We might have got the sting but we ensured that Pakistanis felt the pain. Period.