This is from 2016. And any which way its very poor quality footage.
And funnily the video was spliced and edited before release
This is from 2016. And any which way its very poor quality footage.
Also forgot to add
2nd pic with people around it looks like naval brahmos transport cum launch canister to me
AI bug has really got Pravin Sawhney these days..Pravin Sawhney (@PravinSawhney) Tweeted:
India’s K4 ballistic missile, range 3500km, reported test fired was more accrurate than Chinese missiles. Nonsense. 2 points. K4 uses strap down (on air frame) inertial navigation with ring laser gyro - inaccurate over 2000km. Then PLA using AI for accuracy - intelligence ( )
Yes... They haven't shown the ignition of the main motor..And funnily the video was spliced and edited before release
As if PLA had given him a personal demonstration about their missiles. Oh man there's a licking limitPravin Sawhney (@PravinSawhney) Tweeted:
India’s K4 ballistic missile, range 3500km, reported test fired was more accrurate than Chinese missiles. Nonsense. 2 points. K4 uses strap down (on air frame) inertial navigation with ring laser gyro - inaccurate over 2000km. Then PLA using AI for accuracy - intelligence ( )
As if PLA had given him a personal demonstration about their missiles. Oh man there's a licking limit
My point is how exactly does AI help a BM navigate?AI bug has really got Pravin Sawhney these days..
Yes... They haven't shown the ignition of the main motor..
My point is how exactly does AI help a BM navigate?
My point is how exactly does AI help a BM navigate?
Good lord! AI has become such a magic word that people throw it around like nothing.Pravin Sawhney (@PravinSawhney) Tweeted:
India’s K4 ballistic missile, range 3500km, reported test fired was more accrurate than Chinese missiles. Nonsense. 2 points. K4 uses strap down (on air frame) inertial navigation with ring laser gyro - inaccurate over 2000km. Then PLA using AI for accuracy - intelligence ( )
Does this old fart understand anything about AI ?? Freaking Chinese pimp !!Pravin Sawhney (@PravinSawhney) Tweeted:
India’s K4 ballistic missile, range 3500km, reported test fired was more accrurate than Chinese missiles. Nonsense. 2 points. K4 uses strap down (on air frame) inertial navigation with ring laser gyro - inaccurate over 2000km. Then PLA using AI for accuracy - intelligence ( )
He uses technical jargon to impress people
The thing is that even if we are behind China
Technologically , the Best people who know
And understand the Gaps and Deficiencies and their implications are DRDO and the forces
He is not a Scientist , only a critic
Even the Americans don't have AI based nav for their ballistic missiles . Open source info indicates efforts towards the same but, no headway . They use combination of celestial sensors and INS.
And the AI peddler should be ased if the Chinese artillery guns possess INS and then lecture others.
The artillery which the pok.... are buying don't have it , while dhanush and atags have it.
Even the Americans don't have AI based nav for their ballistic missiles . Open source info indicates efforts towards the same but, no headway . They use combination of celestial sensors and INS.
And the AI peddler should be ased if the Chinese artillery guns possess INS and then lecture others.
The artillery which the pok.... are buying don't have it , while dhanush and atags have it.
Does it have a watermark? If not, hurry up & pls do the needful.@hellbent remember the recently found hydrodynamic model of the probable S-5 class SSBN ? VP Naidu tweeted the photo. It seems somebody made a rough sketch out of that model for the Wikipage on the S-5 :
View attachment 15539
From the sketch it is pretty good looking actually. The BM hump shoulder doesn't seem like a eyesore from this angle.