It was only mentioned LCH was deployed in Ladakh, so obvious vague information. My guess is it was for recon patrol only which it can handle with limited ew & just the gun. IAF probably has enough high end options already before using lch seriously. 2 attack heli does not even scratch the surface. Its a trial run if it ever happened, but nonetheless a confident on its existing systems sort of trial run. Armed forces in such areas do with way less capability at times gear wise, and we are talking about a flying machine.Strela 2, 1st gen stingers, HN5
These MANPADs are 3 decade old technologies and easily available to terrorists around the world.
Without a self protection suite, a couple of rag tag terrorist will bring down the LCH.
And you mean to say that LCH is deployed against infantry of China equipped with FN6 systems?
Whoever says that LCH was deployed in active service (meaning in case a conflict happened, it was kept armed and ready to be used) , is foolish.
About the manpads, has any manpad yet brought down any heli in areas we deployed IAF yet? No, because we are not in a war/martial law stage, rather in a high alert state. So if such an attack happens, only then necessary step will be taken. Before that its moot point, same risk as a bird hitting the heli. Look at the mission systems in previous poster. We have to accept ideal vs existing systems gap for some more time.
I still do not get why you all are so sold on everything being in place before any kind of usage. That part is for operational deployment after full certification & weapon integration. For lsp series trial run it can do with less capability.
As per the above pic, HAL cited payload delivery is 920kg, previously I thought it is ~700kg, only the inboard stations could carry quad rack(8-12 atgm max), & 3 hour endurance.
Last edited: