Who are "they"?Good to see they aren't butt hurt, over the aussie success.
AUKUS: Flawed by Design?
AUKUS has great potential. It could federate defense by allowing the United States and its allies to field capabilities in larger numbers and at lower cost. But that would require the United States and its allies to jointly procure systems to take advantage of economies of scale.www.aei.org
in summary: three parts of this deal raise questions:
1) This is a Frankenstein deal - Australia is going to buy a handful of two different submarines. We need to acquire allied capabilities at scale. So is this the right approach from a cost and complexity perspective?
2) Buying a few more Virginia-class subs would be cheaper and easier than a whole new AUKUS-class. So might a future Aussie government facing budget shortfalls rethink this approach and cancel its Phase 3 participation despite the political costs of doing so?
3) This plan effectively cuts 3-5 Virginia-class subs from the U.S. inventory in our greatest time of need. Australia is a sovereign country that can and should make its own deployment decisions. Is losing ~1/10th of the U.S. sub fleet the right choice in this timeframe?
(Zack Cooper)
AUKUS: Flawed by Design?
AUKUS has great potential. It could federate defense by allowing the United States and its allies to field capabilities in larger numbers and at lower cost. But that would require the United States and its allies to jointly procure systems to take advantage of economies of scale.www.aei.org
in summary: three parts of this deal raise questions:
1) This is a Frankenstein deal - Australia is going to buy a handful of two different submarines. We need to acquire allied capabilities at scale. So is this the right approach from a cost and complexity perspective?
2) Buying a few more Virginia-class subs would be cheaper and easier than a whole new AUKUS-class. So might a future Aussie government facing budget shortfalls rethink this approach and cancel its Phase 3 participation despite the political costs of doing so?
3) This plan effectively cuts 3-5 Virginia-class subs from the U.S. inventory in our greatest time of need. Australia is a sovereign country that can and should make its own deployment decisions. Is losing ~1/10th of the U.S. sub fleet the right choice in this timeframe?
(Zack Cooper)
France Joins AUKUS Submarine Program - Naval News
Under extended plans, France will join the AUKUS submarine program. This will see advanced nuclear-powered attack submarines built for Australia, United Kingdom and France.www.navalnews.com
France Joins AUKUS Submarine Program
Under extended plans, France will join the AUKUS submarine program. This will see advanced nuclear-powered attack submarines built for Australia, United Kingdom and France. The United States is also providing key elements, including interim submarines for the Royal Australian Navy.
Yes, it is a risk. And there are so many uncertainties and problems to overcome with this aukus dealIt's possible the leased Virginias will be decommissioned by the time the AUKUS design is delivered.
Yes, it is a risk. And there are so many uncertainties and problems to overcome with this aukus deal
Is this like the downgraded F-35?the US will provide a downgraded sub.
We stand corrected pops. The F-35 as it exists today is already downgraded . By design not by default.Is this like the downgraded F-35?
nothing about Indonesia, Malaysia, ... or India?Why China Should Worry About Asia’s Reaction to AUKUS
Even some non-aligned countries have cautiously signaled support.foreignpolicy.com