Tigermeet 2023 is off to a flying start Direction Gioia Del Colle with 3 Mirage2000D RMVs and 3 Rafale F4.1
(photo credit ECE 01-030 Côte d'Argent)
(photo credit ECE 01-030 Côte d'Argent)
Wouldn't you have preferred Gripen to Rafale for Croatia?Rafale now officialy in Croatian Air Force!
Croatia Received Its First Rafale
Official transfer ceremony of the first Croatian Rafale was held today. Croatia is the last NATO member state to still use MiG-21 fighter aircraft, and procurement of Rafale has essentially upgrade…warviews.wordpress.com
Official transfer ceremony of the first Croatian Rafale was held today. Croatia is the last NATO member state to still use MiG-21 fighter aircraft, and procurement of Rafale has essentially upgraded Croatian multirole fighter fleet by two generations.
As an aircraft, definitely - though Rafale was always my second choice (third was either F-18 or F-16, with Typhoon being the fourth).Wouldn't you have preferred Gripen to Rafale for Croatia?
As an aircraft, definitely - though Rafale was always my second choice (third was either F-18 or F-16, with Typhoon being the fourth).
Not so sure politically. Sweden is rapidly becoming SJW hellhole, and many of the Gripen parts are sourced from the US, meaning that both Swedish and US governments have a right of veto. Though on the flip side, I also dislike many of French policies, so eh...
What features of the Gripen do you regret not having with the Rafale?As an aircraft, definitely - though Rafale was always my second choice (third was either F-18 or F-16, with Typhoon being the fourth).
Eh, mostly the fact that it is smaller and lighter, and therefore cheaper to operate. I am also not certain that Rafale has been designed with road operations in mind, though I don't think HRZ ever used road operations in the first place, so not a big flaw there.What features of the Gripen do you regret not having with the Rafale?
Pls Dont try to sell virtual aircraft /paper aircraft.The next time you can go for AMCA.
There's no room for that SJW crap here.
But the Rafale is very light: if you compare the Gripen E with the Rafale C, Wikipedia gives an empty weight of 8000 kg versus 9850 kg for the Rafale, but if you take out the engines, you have to take out one tonne for the Gripen and 2 tonnes for the Rafale, which makes a bare empty weight of 7000 kg for the Gripen versus 7850 kg for the Rafale. Given the performance of the Rafale's airframe, I don't think that's excessive. As for the price per flight hour of the Gripen, I think Saab is very enthusiastic about its aircraft.... they have more "faire savoir" (make-know) than "savoir faire" (know-how ).Eh, mostly the fact that it is smaller and lighter, and therefore cheaper to operate. I am also not certain that Rafale has been designed with road operations in mind, though I don't think HRZ ever used road operations in the first place, so not a big flaw there.
Ideal for me will have been something like this:
Novi Avion - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Right, thanks. Plus, cost per flight hour would get equalized somewhat due to airbase maintenance and other ancilliary stuff anyway...But the Rafale is very light: if you compare the Gripen E with the Rafale C, Wikipedia gives an empty weight of 8000 kg versus 9850 kg for the Rafale, but if you take out the engines, you have to take out one tonne for the Gripen and 2 tonnes for the Rafale, which makes a bare empty weight of 7000 kg for the Gripen versus 7850 kg for the Rafale. Given the performance of the Rafale's airframe, I don't think that's excessive. As for the price per flight hour of the Gripen, I think Saab is very enthusiastic about its aircraft.... they have more "faire savoir" (make-know) than "savoir faire" (know-how ).
4.2 was gutted and postponed. what are you guys doing?Rafale F4.2 postponed to 2025