Status
Not open for further replies.
Most probably, the IAF struck the target 100-200m away with 4x SPICE-2000 SOWs (with general purpose munitions), INTENTIONALLY, to send a message to Pakistan
This is somewhat hard to digest.
Why will IAF bomb areas near to population? The bombs did go off. Why will they do that? If even 10 civilians would have been killed, it would have become a political and diplomatic nightmare for India. I think IAF messed up something royally. Remember, this was Pakistan and NOT LoC or Kashmir.
 
Now some other international agency has to support our claim , or india has to release images from Mirage or redacted sat images .
 
Why are we so obsessed with finding out the proof? Clearly, we hit the targets that we aimed for and there have been considerable casualties. Let's just leave it at that.
 
India - Pakistan Standoff 2019

There you go...

To be honest, I think we are trying to grasp at the straws here...

The reference reflectivity of these roof areas have noticeably changed in contrast from PRE to POST (if you reference it to the area inbetween 1) and 2):

PwOjF30.jpg


Notice how there is not such variation in other parts of the roofing (if this is some random effect).

3 is a missing feature, though could be due to the different angle (and thus apparent reflectivity).

If you could get a sample of previous pictures of this level of detail/zoom (say few months before etc), we can check for the base variation in the roof seasonally (to account for anything else going on picture wise). If this stands out in contrast to even that....there is likely evidence here.

Like @Paro said, roof replacement of ingress areas would be the FIRST thing done in a cover up....well before sanitizing completely inside.
 
This is somewhat hard to digest.
Why will IAF bomb areas near to population? The bombs did go off. Why will they do that? If even 10 civilians would have been killed, it would have become a political and diplomatic nightmare for India. I think IAF messed up something royally.
SPICE is a VERY precise kit (3m CEP), there is no doubt about that. It is indeed possible to surgically target something 100-200m off the actual target using SPICE, so I don't think there was any risk of collateral damage .

Regarding civilians, this is another reason why I think GoI/IAF would never want to hit that structure. What if there were children in that seminary? Even the CIA in its drone strikes does extensive real-time evaluation of collateral damage before executing the strike. India had no access to anything like that. It would have been MUCH easier for Pakistan to turn the guns of the international community to India, by showing images/videos of dead/injured children and people and allowing full access to International Media. Pakistan would've claimed that India targeted innocent civilians including children, regardless if it was JeM camp, giving India very limited breathing space.

The only reason Pakistan is not allowing anyone near the seminary is so that nobody can cross-reference the seminary and prove that it was indeed a JeM camp...which goes against Pakistan's CURRENT narrative.
 
The reference reflectivity of these roof areas have noticeably changed in contrast from PRE to POST (if you reference it to the area inbetween 1) and 2):

PwOjF30.jpg


Notice how there is not such variation in other parts of the roofing (if this is some random effect).

3 is a missing feature, though could be due to the different angle (and thus apparent reflectivity).

If you could get a sample of previous pictures of this level of detail/zoom (say few months before etc), we can check for the base variation in the roof seasonally (to account for anything else going on picture wise). If this stands out in contrast to even that....there is likely evidence here.

Like @Paro said, roof replacement of ingress areas would be the FIRST thing done in a cover up....well before sanitizing completely inside.
I'm guessing the second photo is the latest one. The northeast corner of the roof has been replaced for sure.

Look at the contour line on the right side of the roof. There is an uneven break between 2 asbestos sheets. That is because it's been replaced and the size wasn't exactly cut properly. it was placed in a hurry.
 
First of all I'm relieved that someone acturally tried to build a convincing case for the Balakot strike. So far we've heard many absurd explanations that seem to defy the science of how explosives work. I'll now go through this analysis to offer my rebuttal and point out the inconsistencies in this article. To be clear, I do have respect for professionals irrespective of which side of the border or part of the world they come from. But they're as human as any of us are. In my life I have come across professionals, particularly from the armed forces (on both sides of the border), who upheld varying degrees of professionalism. So when I question their claims and confront them with facts, its nothing personal, rather only my tendency to not accept something that doesn't adds up. It is important to realize that this article is the author's version of how things PROBABLY played out, and involves a lot of conjecture. Questions challenging the established narrative should not be disregarded without irrefutable evidence.


Here's where the whole hole theory (no pun intended) began: Twitter user @rajfortseven, the retd. Col. Vinayak Bhatt of the IA. He posts his personal IMINT analysis, which has not been always correct (if anybody is interested, I can refer them to some tweets and why he was wrong there). The resolution of the PlanetLabs imagery is about 72 cm, and as the author rightly points out, we see SMUDGES. If anbody would care to look at the historical Google Earth imagery of the structure, they would realize that similar smudges have been on the roof of the structure in the past as well, in different locations. The most likely explanation for the smudges is the different nature of the CGI sheets used on the roof, probably due to repairs over the years. They might as well be tree branches broken off by high winds.

We now have 50 cm resolution satellite imagery from European Space Imaging, showing no signs of damage, captured on February 27th, 5 days before the date of the PlanetLabs imagery which was captured on March 4th. This imagery shows no visible holes or damage to the structure's roof. In all probability, Col. Bhat erred in his analysis and the low resolution combined with dark smudges gave him this idea. It is important to realize that the holes theory is the foundation of the entire argument.
Besides, Col. Bhatt concluded that SPICE-250s, not SPICE-2000s, were used in the strike. So which version is true?
Images - India, Pakistan Airstrike | European Space Imaging


There are two problems with the penetrator theory:
1. There is no indication of presence of any penetrator like that in IAF's service.
2. The said target did not require the use of a penetrator warhead. A "floor counting" fuse attached to a general purpose bomb would've achieved the required results. It is very hard to believe that a civilian structure at Balakot was in fact a bunker (built probably in the late 90s), the kind only found in military bases for the high command, considering that the location is neither an active war zone nor a military base.


There is no credible, irrefutable evidence of any kind of human loss in the attack. So, far, all claims have been conjecture (questionable audio and video clips, report of one odd journalist). There is no need to elaborate more on that.


Precisely! And to add to that, the hole theory proposes 4x holes and hence 4x SPICE-2000 SOWs, i.e. 280-320 kg of combined total TNT inside the hypothetical bombs. This is NOT an insignificant amount.


It is true that penetrator munitions work on this principle of combining estimated delay figures with smart features like microphones to detect number of penetrated floors. However, a SPICE-2000 kit (or any PGM kit) is DECOUPLED with the 2000lbs munition, as far as fuzing is concerned. The fuze of a penetrator munition is built into the casing, so that it can also survive the penetration shocks alongwith the explosive. This rules out the possibility that SPICE-2000 itself packs the sensors and fuzing mechanism for detonation.


What is also interesting to note is that many other structures also survived the 2005 earthquake. Were they all hardened bunkers as well, built for JeM's leadership?


This is a VERY MISLEADING comparison, specially because the entire henceforth article is based on the premise that the hypothetical 'penetrator bomb' (a 2000lbs munition used with the SPICE-2000 kit) had the characteristics of BLU-116. The BLU-116 Advanced Unitary Penetrator has 109 kg of explosive filling, SIGNIFICANTLY higher than the figure used in the later calculations (80 kg).
Regardless, is the author implying that US or Israel sold such a penetrator munition to IAF? When did this happen?
If not, did DRDO develop such a munition for IAF? When did this happen?


I commend the author for the analysis involving the actual mathematics, specially overpressure. But it seems that it has been written with the intent to justify IAF's claim, by hook or by crook. Misleading assumptions have been made, and clever 'rounding off' has been done to prove the point.

Besides there are still some questions remaining to be addressed here. IAF claims that only 20% of the weapons missed their targets. Considering that 4x of them hit 100-200m off target, where did the rest of the 16x weapons hit?

I will conclude by stating the only possible explanation that would have made more sense. Most probably, the IAF struck the target 100-200m away with 4x SPICE-2000 SOWs (with general purpose munitions), INTENTIONALLY, to send a message to Pakistan. GoI (BJP) probably had already decided (in consent with the IAF & IA) to politicize the strike, regardless of any real damage. As it can be seen so far, the strike achieved its results at home for the GoI. Until the elections are over, explanations and theories will keep coming on Indian TV channels to justify the validity of GoI's claims. As long as the strike remains controversial, it will work out in GoI's favor.

Man you talk sense sometimes but then you insert elections into everything and that makes it all look like joke. Also the clever insertion of this is wrong that is wrong, where is evidence however you don't provide a thing about what you claim wrong.

Elections maybe alien thing for you since your army rules half of the time but elections here are normal, every six month we have an election and some important state is going into polls. This government didn't even bother to offer soaps like every other do in election budget, they even removed railways budget as it was one of the most politically motivated budget and was used to make feel good stories.

You people really need to give up your obsession with elections otherwise you'll never be well, it's worst then a broken record unless of course

"No irrefutable evidence"
"Elections"

Are the keywords you are pushing trying to slide in ISPR narrative by creating doubts and of course the great election theory.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: _Anonymous_
I'm guessing the second photo is the latest one. The northeast corner of the roof has been replaced for sure.

Look at the contour line on the right side of the roof. There is an uneven break between 2 asbestos sheets. That is because it's been replaced and the size wasn't exactly cut properly. it was placed in a hurry.

Yeah these are just what stood out to me at first glance....from what I have worked with albedo in imagery....things don't change so drastically w.r.t each other on something consistent).

But I would like to see what the variation level was in general before the strike over span of months etc.

Apparently the pre-photo is from april 2018 (on google maps).

POST is feb 27th this year.

If we can get some pre-photos at various other points of 2018 (or even 2017, as long as nothing major construction wise was being done), it would be good reference.
 
Man you talk sense sometimes but then you insert elections into everything and that makes it all look like joke. Also the clever insertion of this is wrong that is wrong, where is evidence however you don't provide a thing about what you claim wrong.

Elections maybe alien thing for you since your army rules half of the time but elections here are normal, every six month we have an election and some important state is going into polls. This government didn't even bother to offer soaps like every other do in election budget, they even removed railways budget as it was one of the most politically motivated budget and was used to make feel good stories.

You people really need to give up your obsession with elections otherwise you'll never be well, it's worst then a broken record unless of course

"No irrefutable evidence"
"Elections"

Are the keywords you are pushing trying to slide in ISPR narrative by creating doubts and of course the great election theory.
I have merely put forward a possible explanation, going by Occam's razor. If it makes you feel uncomfortable, you're welcome to put forward a better explanation that sits well with the evidence.

BJP politicians ARE using the strike for point-scoring and propaganda to garner votes. But of course I don't mean that the strike was SOLELY meant for the elections. If the GoI had no choice but to take action, as it had given itself no room to breath because of the hyping up of the 2016 cross-border raids. India needed to respond, in a way better than 2016. If two birds can be killed with one stone, why not?

Regarding some stuff that I claimed was wrong:
1. I did link the latest imagery of Februray 27th. Here it is again:
Images - India, Pakistan Airstrike | European Space Imaging

2. I cannot conclusively prove the non-existence of a 2000lbs penetrator in service with the IAF (I assume the IAF wouldn't entertain my request to go through their inventory). Therefore I asked for the proof of its existence. Similarly, I cannot conclusively prove no loss of life because of the strike, therefore I ask for the contrary.

3. The data for BLU-116 is available below. It has penetration capability of upto 12 feet, twice what would have been required at Balakot (considering penetration of 3x roofs of 2 feet of reinforced concrete each).
BLU-116 Advanced Unitary Penetrator [AUP] GBU-24 C/B (USAF) / GBU-24 D/B (Navy)
BLU-116 Advanced Unitary Penetrator [AUP] GBU-24 C/B (USAF) / GBU-24 D/B (Navy)

4. The author himself bases the entire argument on an 80 kg explosive. A BLU-116, taken as reference for the calculations by the author, has 109 kg of explosives (as mentioned in the links above). Considering that 4x such weapons are being claimed to have hit the structure (4x holes), that sums up to 436 kg of total explosive. This number significantly offsets the overpressure calculations made by the author, which were on the borderline of the 14 kPa figure.

5. The fuze used with the BLU-116 APU is FMU-157/B or FMU-159/B. It is a part of the penetrator and is agnostic to the guidance kit being used. Therefore the author's claim is not correct that the SPICE-2000 itself had the floor-counting fuze.
FMU-157/B Hard Target Smart Fuze [HTSF]
TonyRogers.com | FMU-159/B Hard Target Smart Fuze
 
The reason is the source....

Source is European Space Imaging... Its a satellite image reseller. Quite an old one too.

Images - India, Pakistan Airstrike | European Space Imaging

The file has a time stamp and I have low res pictures from my quotes too... This is most likely the right now.
I am taking down this post (Hiding).... this can be picked by anyone who access the site.... if needed will restore
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Paro
Likely because we have achieved the goals we had set out to achieve.
We haven't avenged the deaths of the Pulwama attack.
We haven't deterred Pakistan from any future attacks.
The impact of Balakot strike was quickly neutralized.
We have been beaten in the perception war.

So nah
 
@safriz

India said we attacked bnb balakot terror camp.....
Pakistan said India attacked Balakot
Pakistan said bombs fell on a valley and few trees were damaged and a crow died
India said 80% of bombs hit the target (Most probably 4/5)
India did not deny that the bomb fell in valley... could be the 20% India mentioned...
Everyone knows and agrees that there is a madrassah at jabba hill top
India says it hit the building in jabba top

Why cant Pakistan take the journalists to the hill top which is not very far away from where the crow's body found?

Why the weather in jabba top is so bad that no one is allowed?

Can you answer these questions without prejudice
Mod edit: Fake Picture
these are the coordinates on google maps

34.432940, 73.324438

Before

1552538509091.png


After

1552538400319.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.