PAF plane skids off runway during landing
https://arynews.tv/en/paf-skids-off...wuxS78Xqy1sPZfBcHScQSEqAu7qY3iJjj3bQktgcvQhqI
https://arynews.tv/en/paf-skids-off...wuxS78Xqy1sPZfBcHScQSEqAu7qY3iJjj3bQktgcvQhqI
India - Pakistan Standoff 2019
- Thread starter nair
- Start date
- Status
we are anyway not getting much info from LOC apart from what baba tells us, we need intermittent funny things from @safriz to keep this thread alive.
Are you aware that the Russians have made a beeline asking India not to proceed with ASRAAM upgrade since Russian R73 shot down F 16? So they will make a pitch to buy more of their weapons knowing fully well that we lied, because they expect us to believe in our own lies?
Of course, there will be claims and counter claims until Pakistan can show SU-30 wreackage or India can show F-16 wreackage.
Point Is
- IAF Showed what in Military terms evidence of Raytheon Aim-120c AMRAAM That counters the Pakistan DG ISPR Claims of not Using F-16
- Second Now PAF have To Show Evidence if JF-17 even Engaged Su-30MKI By Providing Radar Radar signature Recorded in KLJ radar Of JF-17
Last edited:
Thats the problem here... You boys come up with rediculous arguments and then call me funny (Which i dont mind
)R-73 are not being ordered due to exceptional performance but due to maintinance requirements. Most have been sitting in the warehouse for too long and have expired and India does not have Overhaul facilities for the missile, or Russia did not give them as Business tactics,as they saw money making oppertunity.
Also what you and most here dont know is that the equation changes drastically when an air to air missile is pulled out of its sealed container in the warehouse and deployed. In a sealed container in warehouse an AIM-120 AMRAAM has expiry date of 10 years. If the fighter jet flies with the AIM-120 then it expires in 1500 hours of flight and needs thorough checks of electronics and replacement of the propellant after 1500 hours of flight to be operational again.
Likewise is the story of R-73. Now that IAF is regularly flying with the Missile under their wings, they are bound to expire as many have been flown in previous years too and then put in the warehouse and no after escalation between India and Pakistan pulled out from warehouse again and flying again. All th ehours spent in the air in previous years have to be counted along with new hours currently being piled up .
Some Russian missiles have only 40 hours of flight when they expire and need overhaul.
I am not sure bout expiry flight hours of R-73..
But there..
Plenty of footage of that day sits with PAf and not being released in Public domain but being shown to diplomats and visiting dignitaries.
No wonder Malaysia's PM Mahatir was thrilled to see JF-17 and very interested in Buying the ship. He was shown all those footages.
Neither PAF nor IAF cares what we minions write on these corners of Internet. They have better and bigger issues to take care of and just to satisfy us muggles no footage willl be released.
We have to wait and see.
Lol...@safriz
If it is any Consolation , I would like to say here for the First time ,That Regarding your
Feb 27 Raid ;. The Idea was Good
But the Execution was Poor
So many negatives
You lost a F 16 at the hands of MiG 21,
WC killed , Amraams defeated , PAF is afraid of WVR conflict with IAF
Your entire Strategy in Two words is
Bait and Ambush
Your pilots could not the A to G mission
The only thing you got was WC Abhi
And a MiG 21 Bison
That was also not a Dog fight
It was a Bait and Ambush
Today also Your JF 17 was Running Away
From a Su 30 , when it was downed by your
SAM
Dark Days Man
I rather not post thge pics and videos i want to post in reply to your comment, or i will be blamed of trolling and flame baiting.
If what you wrote makes you slepp better at night, i am happy for you
I am Just quoting Facts of the Whole Saga
- Pakistan Denies that it used F-16's . IAF proved it has parts of Aim-120c wreckage
- Pakistan Said that no F-16 Shoot Down but Claims Two pilots in their custody in Press briefing of DG ISPR IAF Said there Was local siting of two parachutes
- In All this Not Even single instance PAF quoted it engaged Su-30 With JF-17 and shot it down News is just conjuncture of Media
- IAF Submitted Report To US authorities over F-16 use US said got Indian authorities objection
- Taiwan Rejects Pakistani media claims of AMRAAM being from there inventory Quoted by taiwan times
Yes, there are a few confusions. But in the fog of war, clear info is hard to come by.
Propaganda and disinformation is part of Military tactics and all parties involved use these tactics.
Those who have trained with military will know that propaganda is taught as a subject in military.
untill MII?? why do we need such a large number when 1:4 is enough for us, if at all we have plan for AMCA. I think 6 squadrons is enough to protect other 24 squadrons.
Burnt........
Also that R-73 rocket motor was found next to the aircraft .
There is no way a missile gets fired and rocket motor remains with or near the aircraft.
Look at pics yourself.
We Pakistanis dug up videos of the wreckage and did frame by frame analysis in public domain and identified all 4 missiles before military released the pictures.
May be you Indians should indulge in similar research instead of useless mud slinging?
Yeah right! The only missile with warhead burnt was the one claimed to be used. Sure!
Not recognizable at all!
Can be picked up and put there. Seriously any lump of burn metal can be claimed as "rocket motor".
If you do a frame by frame analysis of a false video, you will only get false evidence.
Heck your analysis is so broken that it is claimed R-73 and R77 to have same width and height.
What a joke!
We just have to look at width and length. I compared that on this forum and your airforce's lies are exposed.
Please don't use the term 'SHIP' for an aircraft - one can't take you seriously
Carry On !
- Status