What happened to the IAF PC ?
Maybe slides will be released by Defence Journalists that is new in public domain.There is nothing new have come out.... Just confirmed what we and experts in other places have discussed
Nothing of that sort. After the FP article & ISPR & Reham Khan's ex going to town with the no F-16 downed narrative, GoI & IAF were singed enough to issue rebuttals and now stage a PC explaining their stand. Some thing too little & too late. It should've come about immediately after 27th Feb and buried PAF's narrative. Instead we gave them enough leeway to create their own narrative and sow doubts. Totally avoidable but then that's how our establishment operates. In a void and completely reactive, oozing with self righteousness.Govt. trying to keep the F-16 drama running. I get the feeling the screw is being tightened somewhere else....
Yes three of them had crossed the LOC and they were engaged by Wg. Cdr. Abhi and his wingman. In my depiction of air battle what I called the alternative was the actual flight path of the Mig-21 Bisons. He fired from 60* off from head on. meaning he had this f-16 to his 2 o'clock and the F-16 was turning away to exit the Indian air space. After shooting this guy. Abhi did a hard trurn left to to stay within Indian Air space and got shot down by other F-16 during this right turn. We have seen a video in which we see the F-16 going down and a vapour trail in a curve to the right. That vapour trail was of Mig-21.Did the IAF PC just say that Abhinandan Chased 3 F 16s? THREE ????
We have seen a video in which we see the F-16 going down and a vapour trail in a curve to the right. That vapour trail was of Mig-21.
Nothing of that sort. After the FP article & ISPR & Reham Khan's ex going to town with the no F-16 downed narrative, GoI & IAF were singed enough to issue rebuttals and now stage a PC explaining their stand. Some thing too little & too late. It should've come about immediately after 27th Feb and buried PAF's narrative. Instead we gave them enough leeway to create their own narrative and sow doubts. Totally avoidable but then that's how our establishment operates. In a void and completely reactive, oozing with self righteousness.
IAF releasing the evidence immediately after 27nth Feb would have been an even bigger disaster. IAF would have been attacked by the usual catory of people. Showing off and using all your cards at once would have allowed *censored*'s to give retort to everything. Now we have the opportunity to reveal as time is right and prove ISPR wrong. On one hand you want Indians to win the narrative and on the other hand one believes the *censored* narrative of the IAF being "singed".
Personally, IAF shouldn't give a rats *censored* as to what people think.
If the IAF doesn't give a rats *censored*, it should have stuck to it's guns & maintained what they've saying all along. We took down an F-16 but we don't want to release any evidence. Believe it for we're saying so. Why go through the charade now?
I have seen that video here on this forum in which the F-16 is going down and a vapour tarils forms just above and behind it and after that Mig-21 disappears.Except the video in which two parachutes were seen and narrated by bystanders did not leave any vapour trail.
So the Mig 21 video was one which left continuous trail while falling and another plane probably the 2nd F16 was leaving after hitting it.