All I see is your conjectures,
Spice 2000 was already in our armament, we can use it, where & when we want & not claim a friendly country wanted to test a equipment
Better luck answering why GOI/MoD said a friendly country wanted to test a equipment of their on that fateful day.
I find more heat here instead of border ...
Spike was discussed earlier till we move to balakot & then after 10 discussions on balakot day event, now you are expressing surprise that its Spice. How original & thankgod you didn't take more time to realize what was been discussed. Much more like selective amnesia againSo we swiftly moved from Spike to Spice.
Spike was discussed earlier till we move to balakot & then after 10 discussions on balakot day event, now you are expressing surprise that its Spice. How original & thankgod you didn't take more time to realize what was been discussed. Much more like selective amnesia again
ISPR propaganda machinery desperately trying to divert attention. It appears there is a reorganization of Infowar activity by ISPR. They are now trying to use credible sounding names to lead the info war, and bolster their credibility, to be then heavily supported by the troll army to create impressions in SM.
Since you have proved you have amnesia & don't follow when we shifted to Balakot - here let me refresh the discussion to assist you.So you could come up with this part only.
Help me find any of my quote to you regarding Spice.
Or do you engage people with discussions you do with someone else? Out of nowhere?
Isn't we started with you claiming its Spike and me saying a probable Nag?
I wont mind it. Its just contrary to Indian style of working.
like using a slow flying bird on Balakot day, providing video feed of strike, along with a friendly sat
Soothing conjectures.
and so the cookie crumbled with more posts in this subject, tillWhy don't you ask @Falcon & @vstol Jockey if anything *Deleted* Censored by MOds I requote "was present in their airspace, which Pakistanis were completely unaware off on the day of Balakot attack" . And then you will find your own misled conjectures.
I dare them to refute my claim.
@Falcon has already posted on this in this very thread, if I'm not mistaken, shortly after the air strikes.
Ek anaar sau beemar. Talk about over analysis. God Forbid if war were to break out, we'd fill in 400 pages in 4 hours. I sincerely hope it doesn't happen for the server hosting this site would break down. For the sake of the poor server, no war I say.
True. But the discussion on now isn't on the armaments used but the fact that there was something loitering in the Pakistani air space when the bombings at Balakote & other areas were undertaken.
Anything Else the MODs like to censor & why???? misuse of powerAgree, If someone were to revisit the original video showing the attack on Jaba top, when it was presented in news, & follow its speed & slow but sizable rate of turn around the Jaba top, a lot can be made out - about the loitering in Pak airspace which pak was unaware of.
Alan warnes is a fool. Worse that ndtv. Throw him a $10 bill he will strip naked.Someone named Alan Warnes claiming to interview PAF ACM and claiming Su30 MKI kill.
I wonder when the fog clears, the whole world gets clarity, won't we??
Alan warnes is a fool. Worse that ndtv. Throw him a $10 bill he will strip naked
With all due respect, I myself stated 3 times, lets wait for time & things will come out in open in due time. But was someone else willing to let go.@LoneWolfSandeep there is no evidence of the said incident yet and you are fighting over what armament was used to cause it, feels like useless argument, and nobody accused any veteran of being doubtful, you should not make such conclusions lightly. Old members here are together from years and they all respect each other very much, most have met in person so none of them will ever cast any doubt on others motive or reputation.
This argument is going too far and literally producing nothing, this is not the best place to win argument anyhow or settle personal score, you said your piece other person said his, if you agree press agree button or move on. Let's stay on topic.
PS - This post do not require any reply, relax.
Someone named Alan Warnes claiming to interview PAF ACM and claiming Su30 MKI kill.
I wonder when the fog clears, the whole world gets clarity, won't we??
He is a PAF fanboy from west...... Not to be taken seriouy
Since you have proved you have amnesia & don't follow when we shifted to Balakot - here let me refresh the discussion to assist you.
@BlackOpsIndia you want to revert, or is someone forcing me to revert again. Your callIts you who shifted to Balakot and not we.
Fact 1 - No level of writing in bold will make your fantasies comes true.
Fact 2 - You are nobody to know anything classified to a level of what happened at Balakot. You can just guess.
Fact 3 - No one, means no one, including vstol or Falcon claim that they are privy to complete information, they provide their educated opinion plus some info which get leaked to them through network. Even that is unsubstantiated.
Fact 4 - Any statement made, without having complete knowledge, is a conjecture.
Fact 5 - Yours are not even conjectures, but wishful disastrous dreams. Perhaps result of over watching of television/online spy series.
Fact 6 - Cut on the personal remarks if you want to be treated with respect.
Well all these days they had their way... And MoD never bothered to respond to these psy ops or let us call info wars..... Twitter changed the game....Alan Warnes is someone who has acted almost like a PAF paid aviation photographer in the past. Perhaps also taken paid assignments for PAF, especially for international exercises. Has been wrong several times before when reporting about IAF. Not a reliable source in any case.
Anyways the wording of that tweet is itself ridiculous, almost a draft statement from PAF and not that of a seasoned journalist. I expect that Statement from ISPR release. No journalist who claims to be neutral will under any circumstance use the wording, "The PAF chief again confirmed..." Not done. Ask any journo, definitely not done.
ISPR propaganda machinery desperately trying to divert attention. It appears there is a reorganization of Infowar activity by ISPR. They are now trying to use credible sounding names to lead the info war, and bolster their credibility, to be then heavily supported by the troll army to create impressions in SM.
Since its been a only one sided, call for refrain, and someone wants to continue discussion it seems.Its you who shifted to Balakot and not we.
Fact 1 - No level of writing in bold will make your fantasies comes true.
Fact 2 - You are nobody to know anything classified to a level of what happened at Balakot. You can just guess.
Fact 3 - No one, means no one, including vstol or Falcon claim that they are privy to complete information, they provide their educated opinion plus some info which get leaked to them through network. Even that is unsubstantiated.
Fact 4 - Any statement made, without having complete knowledge, is a conjecture.
Fact 5 - Yours are not even conjectures, but wishful disastrous dreams. Perhaps result of over watching of television/online spy series.
Fact 6 - Cut on the personal remarks if you want to be treated with respect.
I wont mind it. Its just contrary to Indian style of working.
like using a slow flying bird on Balakot day, providing video feed of strike, along with a friendly sat
Soothing conjectures.
If its a conjecture why was the need to delete part of my post by Mods.??? see who having conjecture, forget about misuse of power, or advancement of argument points by censor, then claiming how we ever came to spice discussion in the first place. lol"was present in their airspace, which Pakistanis were completely unaware off on the day of Balakot attack" . And then you will find your own misled conjectures.
Even the govt released official video on day of strike in infrared showing the missiles hitting on Jaba Top@Falcon has already posted on this in this very thread, if I'm not mistaken, shortly after the air strikes.
Agree, If someone were to revisit the original video showing the attack on Jaba top, when it was presented in news, & follow its speed & slow but sizable rate of turn around the Jaba top, a lot can be made out - about the loitering in Pak airspace which pak was unaware of.