original message
original message
Not at this juncture......Expect Pakistanis to start their drama today. NOTAM, black out etc etc....
Not at this juncture......
Our oil dependence on foreign powers that night stopped us.
Something @Falcon and @vstol Jockey are saying from long. They were lucky to have lost just F16 and not whole country.
Our oil dependence on foreign powers that night stopped us.
Sir what about those Kashmiris in POK, Sindhis in Sindhudesh, Balochs in Baluchistan and Pathans in Pashtunistan??? They are getting persecuted on a daily basis. Even every second counts for them. The more we delay their liberation the more they will suffer. That is why we should take action now not because we can win but because we couldn't tolerate more.No. Our policy stopped us. We are not looking for a war. Uffff ... you are not reading what I have been typing right from Uri times --- we are not going to war. We will take them down more deliberately, with minimum effects on us. Why fight when you have more effective instruments to help the enemy commit suicide?
Sir what about those Kashmiris in POK, Sindhis in Sindhudesh, Balochs in Baluchistan and Pathans in Pashtunistan??? They are getting persecuted on a daily basis. Even every second counts for them. The more we delay their liberation the more they will suffer. That is why we should take action now not because we can win but because we couldn't tolerate more.
That still doesn't answer the question of the persecution of all the non Punjabi Muslims in Pakistan. I think on humanitarian grounds we ' must' help them.Frankly, that is an internal affair of Pakistan. Really not concerned with them. Baluchistan issue is something which is akin to Kashmir issue, so my suppport on that front is purely as a reciprocal action to Pakistanis meddling in J&K.
If you study carefully, apart from multiple claims by fanboys online, who will always quote someone they know who knows someone who knows someone, to perpetuate a situation of "active" Indian involvement in Baluch movement. But nothing could be further from the truth.
Had we been actively involved, we would have seen spectacular results by now, by pumping in about $2Billions into the movement for a start.
We need to look after our interests; instability & chaos to west of us does not help our interests.
That "humanitarian ground" escuse is a slippery slope that is best left untouchedThat still doesn't answer the question of the persecution of all the non Punjabi Muslims in Pakistan. I think on humanitarian grounds we ' must' help them.
That still doesn't answer the question of the persecution of all the non Punjabi Muslims in Pakistan. I think on humanitarian grounds we ' must' help them.
None of our business. Strictly, Pakistan's own affairs as to how they want to treat their minorities. As long as they don't pontify to us, from my side, do whatever you want (to Pakistanis).
We need to concentrate on our own society for all the actions needed under "humanitarian" heading.
Strictly speaking, I am supporter of all actions which prod Pakistan to mind its own business, whatever it may be (the business), our actions need to be proportional & in consonance to our core beliefs & security imperatives/national interest.
instability & chaos to west of us does not help our interests
A rouge and brutal regime in our western border will always be harmful for us. Maybe all those persecutions are ' none of our buissness ' but surely we could use them as a reason to strike and destroy Pakistan because frankly speaking the very existence of Pakistan is now not in our interest even it is constantly putting adverse effects on them.None of our business. Strictly, Pakistan's own affairs as to how they want to treat their minorities. As long as they don't pontify to us, from my side, do whatever you want (to Pakistanis).
We need to concentrate on our own society for all the actions needed under "humanitarian" heading.
Strictly speaking, I am supporter of all actions which prod Pakistan to mind its own business, whatever it may be (the business), our actions need to be proportional & in consonance to our core beliefs & security imperatives/national interest.
I wonder how long will this continue though? There are already reports that in view of the heavily fortified LoC, the PA / ISI duo have shifted infiltration to Punjab. What's to prevent them from shifting it further south to Rajasthan & Gujarat in the near to long term future. Given that they've eschewed an open war, with the easing of restrictions in Kashmir, we are bound to see a backlash there. It could potentially translate in intensification of the insurgency there and a possible spread across the mainland manifesting in spectacular strikes.Apart from this, there are other fault lines for the PA / ISI to probe across India. Any insight on how are we going to manage this intensification of hybrid warfare across the country, a Conventional Balakote type response not withstanding & assuming it'd end just as inconclusively like it did on 27th February.None of our business. Strictly, Pakistan's own affairs as to how they want to treat their minorities. As long as they don't pontify to us, from my side, do whatever you want (to Pakistanis).
We need to concentrate on our own society for all the actions needed under "humanitarian" heading.
Strictly speaking, I am supporter of all actions which prod Pakistan to mind its own business, whatever it may be (the business), our actions need to be proportional & in consonance to our core beliefs & security imperatives/national interest.
Nah all the world powers use it frequently to further their interests. If we have the ambition to become a superpower we should start behaving like one.That "humanitarian ground" escuse is a slippery slope that is best left untouched
I wonder how long will this continue though? There are already reports that in view of the heavily fortified LoC, the PA / ISI duo have shifted infiltration to Punjab